Reply to Pavičić's 'Comment on "Optimal conversion of Kochen-Specker sets into bipartite perfect quantum strategies"' (arXiv:2502.13787)
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02974v1
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 20:00:06 GMT
- Title: Reply to Pavičić's 'Comment on "Optimal conversion of Kochen-Specker sets into bipartite perfect quantum strategies"' (arXiv:2502.13787)
- Authors: Stefan Trandafir, Adán Cabello,
- Abstract summary: Pavivci'c claims that 10 statements in our paper are wrong.<n>We respond to other claims made by Pavivci'c about our work.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: According to Pavi\v{c}i{\'c}, Kochen and Specker's 117-observable set is not a ``Kochen-Specker set''. By the same reason, in arXiv:2502.13787, Pavi\v{c}i{\'c} claims that 10 statements in our paper ``Optimal conversion of Kochen-Specker sets into bipartite perfect quantum strategies'' [Phys. Rev. A 111, 022408 (2025)] are ``wrong''. In all cases, Pavi\v{c}i{\'c}'s claims are based on the fact that he is assuming a different definition of Kochen-Specker (KS) set. Adopting a terminology used by, e.g., Larsson, the sets that Pavi\v{c}i{\'c} call KS sets can be called ``extended'' KS sets, since they are constructed by adding observables to the ``original'' KS sets. For example, Pavi\v{c}i{\'c} adds 75 observables to the original 117-observable KS set. Beyond terminology, there are fundamental physical reasons for focusing on the original KS sets. One reason is that, for experimentally observing quantum state-independent contextuality, there is no need to measure the observables added in the extended sets. Another reason is that, to produce bipartite perfect quantum strategies, or correlations in a face of the nonsignaling polytope with no local points, or correlations with nonlocal content 1, the two parties do not need to measure any of the observables added in the extended sets. We also respond to other claims made by Pavi\v{c}i{\'c} about our work.
Related papers
- How to be an orthodox quantum mechanic [0.0]
We review a collection of 33 textbooks on quantum mechanics, encompassing the most popular and prominent works of this nature.
We gauge their response to 12 propositions to build up a picture of exactly what is believed by an orthodox quantum mechanic.
We demonstrate that this orthodoxy is largely unchanged over the past century, with some interesting emerging deviations, and has many aspects of Copenhagen-like viewpoints.
The revealed orthodoxy has two main pillars: measurement inherently disturbs quantum states and these states refer to individual instances, not ensembles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T09:50:54Z) - Two fundamental solutions to the rigid Kochen-Specker set problem and the solution to the minimal Kochen-Specker set problem under one assumption [0.0]
We show that two fundamental structures of quantum theory define two rigid KS sets.<n>One of these structures is the super-symmetric informationally complete positive-operator-valued measure.<n>The other is the minimal state-independent contextuality set.<n>We prove that the smallest rigid KS set that contains the minimal complete state-independent contextuality set has 31 observables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-20T18:13:28Z) - Kochen-Specker for many qubits and the classical limit [55.2480439325792]
It is shown that quantum and classical predictions converge as the number of qubits is increases to the macroscopic scale.<n>This way to explain the classical limit concurs with, and improves, a result previously reported for GHZ states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-26T22:30:58Z) - Maximal Non-Kochen-Specker Sets and a Lower Bound on the Size of
Kochen-Specker Sets [1.5163329671980246]
A Kochen-Specker (KS) set is a finite collection of vectors on the two-sphere containing no antipodal pairs.
The existence of KS sets lies at the heart of Kochen and Specker's argument against non-contextual hidden variable theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T11:38:16Z) - Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed.
In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z) - Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical.
We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more.
Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z) - Why we should interpret density matrices as moment matrices: the case of
(in)distinguishable particles and the emergence of classical reality [69.62715388742298]
We introduce a formulation of quantum theory (QT) as a general probabilistic theory but expressed via quasi-expectation operators (QEOs)
We will show that QT for both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles can be formulated in this way.
We will show that finitely exchangeable probabilities for a classical dice are as weird as QT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T14:47:39Z) - Contextuality in composite systems: the role of entanglement in the
Kochen-Specker theorem [0.0]
The Kochen--Specker (KS) theorem reveals the nonclassicality of single quantum systems.
Bell's theorem and entanglement concern the nonclassicality of composite quantum systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-28T10:10:53Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Contextual inferences, nonlocality, and the incompleteness of quantum
mechanics [0.0]
We show that quantum mechanics violates predictive completeness, allowing to make contextual inferences.
We give here a set of new arguments to show that $psi$ should be completed indeed, not by looking for any "hidden variables"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-17T16:54:54Z) - Quantum-secure message authentication via blind-unforgeability [74.7729810207187]
We propose a natural definition of unforgeability against quantum adversaries called blind unforgeability.
This notion defines a function to be predictable if there exists an adversary who can use "partially blinded" access to predict values.
We show the suitability of blind unforgeability for supporting canonical constructions and reductions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2018-03-10T05:31:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.