Vision-Language Models Struggle to Align Entities across Modalities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03854v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 19:36:43 GMT
• Title: Vision-Language Models Struggle to Align Entities across Modalities
• Authors: Iñigo Alonso, Ander Salaberria, Gorka Azkune, Jeremy Barnes, Oier Lopez de Lacalle,
• Abstract summary: Cross-modal entity linking is a fundamental skill needed for real-world applications such as multimodal code generation.<n>Our benchmark, MATE, consists of 5.5k evaluation instances featuring visual scenes aligned with their textual representations.<n>We evaluate state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and humans on this task, and find thatVLMs struggle significantly compared to humans.
• Score: 13.100184125419695
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cross-modal entity linking refers to the ability to align entities and their attributes across different modalities. While cross-modal entity linking is a fundamental skill needed for real-world applications such as multimodal code generation, fake news detection, or scene understanding, it has not been thoroughly studied in the literature. In this paper, we introduce a new task and benchmark to address this gap. Our benchmark, MATE, consists of 5.5k evaluation instances featuring visual scenes aligned with their textual representations. To evaluate cross-modal entity linking performance, we design a question-answering task that involves retrieving one attribute of an object in one modality based on a unique attribute of that object in another modality. We evaluate state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and humans on this task, and find that VLMs struggle significantly compared to humans, particularly as the number of objects in the scene increases. Our analysis also shows that, while chain-of-thought prompting can improve VLM performance, models remain far from achieving human-level proficiency. These findings highlight the need for further research in cross-modal entity linking and show that MATE is a strong benchmark to support that progress.

Related papers

• Towards Text-Image Interleaved Retrieval [49.96332254241075]
  We introduce the text-image interleaved retrieval (TIIR) task, where the query and document are interleaved text-image sequences. We construct a TIIR benchmark based on naturally interleaved wikiHow tutorials, where a specific pipeline is designed to generate interleaved queries. We propose a novel Matryoshka Multimodal Embedder (MME), which compresses the number of visual tokens at different granularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T12:00:47Z)
• MET-Bench: Multimodal Entity Tracking for Evaluating the Limitations of Vision-Language and Reasoning Models [0.0]
  We introduce MET-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of vision-language models to track entity states across modalities.<n>Our findings reveal a significant performance gap between text-based and image-based tracking and that this performance gap stems from deficits in visual reasoning rather than perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T19:39:58Z)
• Teaching VLMs to Localize Specific Objects from In-context Examples [56.797110842152]
  We find that present-day Vision-Language Models (VLMs) lack a fundamental cognitive ability: learning to localize specific objects in a scene by taking into account the context. This work is the first to explore and benchmark personalized few-shot localization for VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T13:34:22Z)
• Web-Scale Visual Entity Recognition: An LLM-Driven Data Approach [56.55633052479446]
  Web-scale visual entity recognition presents significant challenges due to the lack of clean, large-scale training data. We propose a novel methodology to curate such a dataset, leveraging a multimodal large language model (LLM) for label verification, metadata generation, and rationale explanation. Experiments demonstrate that models trained on this automatically curated data achieve state-of-the-art performance on web-scale visual entity recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T06:55:24Z)
• Why context matters in VQA and Reasoning: Semantic interventions for VLM input modalities [18.859309032300402]
  We investigate how the integration of information from image and text modalities influences the performance and behavior of Visual Language Model (VLM) predictions. We study the interplay between text and image modalities in different configurations where visual content is essential for solving the VQA task. Our results show that complementary information between modalities improves answer and reasoning quality, while contradictory information harms model performance and confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T16:02:02Z)
• Assessing Modality Bias in Video Question Answering Benchmarks with Multimodal Large Language Models [12.841405829775852]
  We introduce the modality importance score (MIS) to identify bias inVidQA benchmarks and datasets. We also propose an innovative method using state-of-the-art MLLMs to estimate the modality importance. Our results indicate that current models do not effectively integrate information due to modality imbalance in existing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T23:32:42Z)
• VEGA: Learning Interleaved Image-Text Comprehension in Vision-Language Large Models [76.94378391979228]
  We introduce a new, more demanding task known as Interleaved Image-Text (IITC) This task challenges models to discern and disregard superfluous elements in both images and text to accurately answer questions. In support of this task, we further craft a new VEGA dataset, tailored for the IITC task on scientific content, and devised a subtask, Image-Text Association (ITA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:59:40Z)
• CODIS: Benchmarking Context-Dependent Visual Comprehension for Multimodal Large Language Models [58.95889895912716]
  We introduce a new benchmark, named as CODIS, designed to assess the ability of models to use context provided in free-form text to enhance visual comprehension. Our findings indicate that MLLMs consistently fall short of human performance on this benchmark. This underscores the pressing need to enhance the ability of MLLMs to comprehend visuals in a context-dependent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:21:12Z)
• Unified Visual Relationship Detection with Vision and Language Models [89.77838890788638]
  This work focuses on training a single visual relationship detector predicting over the union of label spaces from multiple datasets. We propose UniVRD, a novel bottom-up method for Unified Visual Relationship Detection by leveraging vision and language models. Empirical results on both human-object interaction detection and scene-graph generation demonstrate the competitive performance of our model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T00:06:28Z)
• Entity-Graph Enhanced Cross-Modal Pretraining for Instance-level Product Retrieval [152.3504607706575]
  This research aims to conduct weakly-supervised multi-modal instance-level product retrieval for fine-grained product categories. We first contribute the Product1M datasets, and define two real practical instance-level retrieval tasks. We exploit to train a more effective cross-modal model which is adaptively capable of incorporating key concept information from the multi-modal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T15:40:45Z)
• Cross-Modality Relevance for Reasoning on Language and Vision [22.41781462637622]
  This work deals with the challenge of learning and reasoning over language and vision data for the related downstream tasks such as visual question answering (VQA) and natural language for visual reasoning (NLVR) We design a novel cross-modality relevance module that is used in an end-to-end framework to learn the relevance representation between components of various input modalities under the supervision of a target task. Our proposed approach shows competitive performance on two different language and vision tasks using public benchmarks and improves the state-of-the-art published results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T20:17:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.