Chart-HQA: A Benchmark for Hypothetical Question Answering in Charts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04095v2
• Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 05:18:44 GMT
• Title: Chart-HQA: A Benchmark for Hypothetical Question Answering in Charts
• Authors: Xiangnan Chen, Yuancheng Fang, Qian Xiao, Juncheng Li, Jun Lin, Siliang Tang, Yi Yang, Yueting Zhuang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel Chart Hypothetical Question Answering (HQA) task, which imposes assumptions on the same question to compel models to engage in counterfactual reasoning based on the chart content.<n> Furthermore, we introduce HAI, a human-AI interactive data synthesis approach that leverages the efficient text-editing capabilities of MLLMs alongside human expert knowledge to generate diverse and high-quality HQA data at a low cost.
• Score: 62.45232157149698
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have garnered significant attention for their strong visual-semantic understanding. Most existing chart benchmarks evaluate MLLMs' ability to parse information from charts to answer questions. However, they overlook the inherent output biases of MLLMs, where models rely on their parametric memory to answer questions rather than genuinely understanding the chart content. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel Chart Hypothetical Question Answering (HQA) task, which imposes assumptions on the same question to compel models to engage in counterfactual reasoning based on the chart content. Furthermore, we introduce HAI, a human-AI interactive data synthesis approach that leverages the efficient text-editing capabilities of LLMs alongside human expert knowledge to generate diverse and high-quality HQA data at a low cost. Using HAI, we construct Chart-HQA, a challenging benchmark synthesized from publicly available data sources. Evaluation results on 18 MLLMs of varying model sizes reveal that current models face significant generalization challenges and exhibit imbalanced reasoning performance on the HQA task.

Related papers

• Distill Visual Chart Reasoning Ability from LLMs to MLLMs [38.62832112530892]
  Solving complex chart Q&A tasks requires advanced visual reasoning abilities in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) We propose Code-as-Intermediary Translation (CIT), a cost-effective, efficient and easily scalable data synthesis method for distilling visual reasoning abilities from LLMs to MLLMs. We employ text-based synthesizing techniques to construct chart-plotting code and produce ReachQA, a dataset containing 3k reasoning-intensive charts and 20k Q&A pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T14:50:42Z)
• How Do Large Language Models Understand Graph Patterns? A Benchmark for Graph Pattern Comprehension [53.6373473053431]
  This work introduces a benchmark to assess large language models' capabilities in graph pattern tasks. We have developed a benchmark that evaluates whether LLMs can understand graph patterns based on either terminological or topological descriptions. Our benchmark encompasses both synthetic and real datasets, and a variety of models, with a total of 11 tasks and 7 models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:48:33Z)
• Charting the Future: Using Chart Question-Answering for Scalable Evaluation of LLM-Driven Data Visualizations [7.32619928577074]
  We propose a novel framework that leverages Visual Question Answering (VQA) models to automate the evaluation of LLM-generated data visualizations. Our results indicate that LLM-generated charts do not match the accuracy of the original non-LLM-generated charts based on VQA performance measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T14:02:48Z)
• Advancing Multimodal Large Language Models in Chart Question Answering with Visualization-Referenced Instruction Tuning [1.6570772838074355]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) exhibit great potential for chart question answering (CQA) Recent efforts primarily focus on scaling up training datasets through data collection and synthesis. We propose a visualization-referenced instruction tuning approach to guide the training dataset enhancement and model development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T17:04:34Z)
• On Pre-training of Multimodal Language Models Customized for Chart Understanding [83.99377088129282]
  This paper explores the training processes necessary to improve MLLMs' comprehension of charts. We introduce CHOPINLLM, an MLLM tailored for in-depth chart comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T17:58:36Z)
• CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs [62.84082370758761]
  CharXiv is a comprehensive evaluation suite involving 2,323 charts from arXiv papers. To ensure quality, all charts and questions are handpicked, curated, and verified by human experts. Results reveal a substantial, previously underestimated gap between the reasoning skills of the strongest proprietary model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T17:50:11Z)
• Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision [48.60598455782159]
  We present textscPuzzleBen, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T07:39:15Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• Synthesize Step-by-Step: Tools, Templates and LLMs as Data Generators for Reasoning-Based Chart VQA [9.659820850719413]
  We leverage Large Language Models (LLMs), which have shown to have strong reasoning ability, as an automatic data annotator. Key innovation in our method lies in the Synthesize Step-by-Step strategy. We significantly enhance the chart VQA models, achieving the state-of-the-art accuracy on the ChartQA and PlotQA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T03:02:27Z)
• ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Charts [36.492851648081405]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in image understanding and generation. Current benchmarks fail to accurately evaluate the chart comprehension of MLLMs due to limited chart types and inappropriate metrics. We propose ChartBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess chart comprehension and data reliability through complex visual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:20:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.