Knowledge Updating? No More Model Editing! Just Selective Contextual Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05212v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 08:04:25 GMT
• Title: Knowledge Updating? No More Model Editing! Just Selective Contextual Reasoning
• Authors: Guoxiu He, Xin Song, Aixin Sun,
• Abstract summary: We provide an evaluation of ten model editing methods along four dimensions: reliability, generalization, locality, and portability.<n>We then propose a straightforward method called Selective Contextual Reasoning (SCR) for knowledge updating.
• Score: 38.018263569983226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As real-world knowledge evolves, the information embedded within large language models (LLMs) can become outdated, inadequate, or erroneous. Model editing has emerged as a prominent approach for updating LLMs' knowledge with minimal computational costs and parameter changes. This approach typically identifies and adjusts specific model parameters associated with newly acquired knowledge. However, existing methods often underestimate the adverse effects that parameter modifications can have on broadly distributed knowledge. More critically, post-edit LLMs frequently struggle with multi-hop reasoning and continuous knowledge updates. Although various studies have discussed these shortcomings, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation. In this paper, we provide an evaluation of ten model editing methods along four dimensions: reliability, generalization, locality, and portability. Results confirm that all ten popular model editing methods show significant shortcomings across multiple dimensions, suggesting model editing is less promising. We then propose a straightforward method called Selective Contextual Reasoning (SCR), for knowledge updating. SCR does not modify model parameters but harnesses LLM's inherent contextual reasoning capabilities utilizing the updated knowledge pieces. Under SCR, an LLM first assesses whether an incoming query falls within the scope of an external knowledge base. If it does, the relevant external knowledge texts are contextualized to enhance reasoning; otherwise, the query is answered directly. We evaluate SCR against the ten model editing methods on two counterfactual datasets with three backbone LLMs. Empirical results confirm the effectiveness and efficiency of contextual reasoning for knowledge updating.

Related papers

• CaKE: Circuit-aware Editing Enables Generalizable Knowledge Learners [88.35958039968081]
  CaKE (Circuit-aware Knowledge Editing) is a novel method that enables more effective integration of updated knowledge in large language models. Results show that CaKE enables more accurate and consistent use of updated knowledge across related reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T17:14:34Z)
• Lifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning [30.554641380670315]
  We introduce RECIPE, a ContInuous Prompt lEarning method to boost editing efficacy and inference efficiency in lifelong learning. RECIPE first converts knowledge statements into short and informative continuous prompts, prefixed to the LLM's input query embedding. It further integrates the Knowledge Sentinel (KS) that acts as an intermediary to calculate a dynamic threshold. Our retriever and prompt encoder are jointly trained to achieve editing properties, i.e. reliability, generality, and locality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T08:52:11Z)
• Robust and Scalable Model Editing for Large Language Models [75.95623066605259]
  We propose EREN (Edit models by REading Notes) to improve the scalability and robustness of LLM editing. Unlike existing techniques, it can integrate knowledge from multiple edits, and correctly respond to syntactically similar but semantically unrelated inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T06:57:23Z)
• Editing Conceptual Knowledge for Large Language Models [65.38231526537476]
  This paper pioneers the investigation of editing conceptual knowledge for Large Language Models (LLMs) We construct a novel benchmark dataset ConceptEdit and establish a suite of new metrics for evaluation. experimental results reveal that, although existing editing methods can efficiently modify concept-level definition to some extent, they also have the potential to distort the related instantial knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T16:57:10Z)
• SWEA: Updating Factual Knowledge in Large Language Models via Subject Word Embedding Altering [17.20346072074533]
  Recent model editing is a promising technique for efficiently updating a small amount of knowledge of large language models. We propose a detachable and expandable Subject Word Embedding Altering (SWEA) framework, which finds the editing embeddings through token-level matching. We demonstrate the overall state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance of SWEA$oplus$OS on the CounterFact and zsRE datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T13:08:45Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• Eva-KELLM: A New Benchmark for Evaluating Knowledge Editing of LLMs [54.22416829200613]
  Eva-KELLM is a new benchmark for evaluating knowledge editing of large language models. Experimental results indicate that the current methods for knowledge editing using raw documents are not effective in yielding satisfactory results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T09:17:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.