A Bot-based Approach to Manage Codes of Conduct in Open-Source Projects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05479v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 14:50:02 GMT
• Title: A Bot-based Approach to Manage Codes of Conduct in Open-Source Projects
• Authors: Sergio Cobos, Javier Luis Cánovas Izquierdo,
• Abstract summary: We propose an approach to effectively manage codes of conduct in OSS projects based on the Contributor Covenant proposal.<n>Our solution has been implemented as a bot-based solution where bots help in the definition of codes of conduct, the monitoring of OSS projects, and the enforcement of ethical rules.
• Score: 0.3222802562733786
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The development of Open-Source Software (OSS) projects relies on the collaborative work of contributors, generally scattered around the world. To enable this collaboration, OSS projects are hosted on social-coding platforms like GitHub, which provide the infrastructure to host the code as well as the support for enabling the participation of the community. The potentially rich and diverse mixture of contributors in OSS projects makes their management not only a technical challenge, where automation tools and bots are usually deployed, but also a social one. To this aim, OSS projects have been increasingly deploying a declaration of their code of conduct, which defines rules to ensure a respectful and inclusive participatory environment in the community, being the Contributor Covenant the main model to follow. However, the broad adoption and enforcement of codes of conduct in OSS projects is still limited. In particular, the definition, deployment, and enforcement of codes of conduct is a very challenging task. In this paper, we propose an approach to effectively manage codes of conduct in OSS projects based on the Contributor Covenant proposal. Our solution has been implemented as a bot-based solution where bots help in the definition of codes of conduct, the monitoring of OSS projects, and the enforcement of ethical rules.

Related papers

• Characterising Open Source Co-opetition in Company-hosted Open Source Software Projects: The Cases of PyTorch, TensorFlow, and Transformers [5.2337753974570616]
  Companies, including market rivals, have long collaborated on the development of open source software (OSS) "Open source co-opetition" results in a tangle of co-operation and competition known as "open source co-opetition"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T19:35:41Z)
• CROSS: A Contributor-Project Interaction Lifecycle Model for Open Source Software [2.9631016562930546]
  Cross model is a novel contributor-project interaction lifecycle model for open source software. It explains a range of archetypal cases of contributor engagement and highlights research gaps, especially in EoS/offboarding scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T17:57:12Z)
• Compromising Embodied Agents with Contextual Backdoor Attacks [69.71630408822767]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed the development of embodied intelligence. This paper uncovers a significant backdoor security threat within this process. By poisoning just a few contextual demonstrations, attackers can covertly compromise the contextual environment of a black-box LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T01:20:12Z)
• CoAct: A Global-Local Hierarchy for Autonomous Agent Collaboration [87.51781348070914]
  Existing LLMs exhibit remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, but still struggle with complex real-world tasks. We propose the CoAct framework, which transfers the hierarchical planning and collaboration patterns in human society to LLM systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T09:23:53Z)
• How to Gain Commit Rights in Modern Top Open Source Communities? [14.72524623433377]
  We study the policies and practical implementations of committer qualifications in modern top OSS communities. We construct a taxonomy of committer qualifications, consisting of 26 codes categorized into nine themes. We find that the probability of gaining commit rights decreases as participation time passes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T01:23:06Z)
• DECIDER: A Dual-System Rule-Controllable Decoding Framework for Language Generation [57.07295906718989]
  Constrained decoding approaches aim to control the meaning or style of text generated by a Pre-trained Language Model (PLM) using specific target words during inference. We propose a novel decoding framework, DECIDER, which enables us to program rules on how we complete tasks to control a PLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T11:49:08Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Unveiling Diversity: Empowering OSS Project Leaders with Community Diversity and Turnover Dashboards [51.67585198094836]
  CommunityTapestry is a dynamic real-time community dashboard. It presents key diversity and turnover signals that we identified from the literature. It helped project leaders identify areas of improvement and gave them actionable information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T22:12:57Z)
• Nip it in the Bud: Moderation Strategies in Open Source Software Projects and the Role of Bots [17.02726827353919]
  This study examines the various structures and norms that support community moderation in open source software projects. We interviewed 14 practitioners to uncover existing moderation practices and ways that automation can provide assistance. Our main contributions include a characterization of moderated content in OSS projects, moderation techniques, as well as perceptions of and recommendations for improving the automation of moderation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T19:42:51Z)
• Towards a Critical Open-Source Software Database [0.0]
  CrOSSD project aims to build a database of OSS projects and measure their current project "health" status. quantitative metrics will be gathered through automated crawling of meta information such as the number of contributors, commits and lines of code. qualitative metrics will be gathered for selected "critical" projects through manual analysis and automated tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T10:43:21Z)
• Concurrent Subsidiary Supervision for Unsupervised Source-Free Domain Adaptation [58.431124236254]
  We develop a novel process of sticker intervention and cast sticker classification as a supervised subsidiary DA problem concurrent to the goal task unsupervised DA. Our approach not only improves goal task adaptation performance, but also facilitates privacy-oriented source-free DA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T02:25:09Z)
• Regulation conform DLT-operable payment adapter based on trustless - justified trust combined generalized state channels [77.34726150561087]
  Economy of Things (EoT) will be based on software agents running on peer-to-peer trustless networks. We give an overview of current solutions that differ in their fundamental values and technological possibilities. We propose to combine the strengths of the crypto based, decentralized trustless elements with established and well regulated means of payment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T10:45:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.