Rule-Based Conflict-Free Decision Framework in Swarm Confrontation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07077v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 09:00:01 GMT
• Title: Rule-Based Conflict-Free Decision Framework in Swarm Confrontation
• Authors: Zhaoqi Dong, Zhinan Wang, Quanqi Zheng, Bin Xu, Lei Chen, Jinhu Lv,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel decision-making framework that integrates probabilistic finite state machine, deep convolutional networks, and reinforcement learning.<n>Our framework overcomes state machine instability and JoD problems, ensuring reliable and adaptable decisions in swarm confrontation.
• Score: 6.618327118416159
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditional rule--based decision--making methods with interpretable advantage, such as finite state machine, suffer from the jitter or deadlock(JoD) problems in extremely dynamic scenarios. To realize agent swarm confrontation, decision conflicts causing many JoD problems are a key issue to be solved. Here, we propose a novel decision--making framework that integrates probabilistic finite state machine, deep convolutional networks, and reinforcement learning to implement interpretable intelligence into agents. Our framework overcomes state machine instability and JoD problems, ensuring reliable and adaptable decisions in swarm confrontation. The proposed approach demonstrates effective performance via enhanced human--like cooperation and competitive strategies in the rigorous evaluation of real experiments, outperforming other methods.

Related papers

• Achieving Unanimous Consensus in Decision Making Using Multi-Agents [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel deliberation-based consensus mechanism where Large Language Models (LLMs) act as rational agents engaging in structured discussions to reach a unanimous consensus. By leveraging graded consensus and a multi-round deliberation process, our approach ensures both unanimous consensus for definitive problems and graded confidence for prioritized decisions and policies. We also address key challenges with this novel approach such as degeneration of thoughts, hallucinations, malicious models and nodes, resource consumption, and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T21:02:54Z)
• Quantum-Inspired Reinforcement Learning in the Presence of Epistemic Ambivalence [4.683612295430956]
  Epistem ambivalence (EA) emerges from conflicting pieces of evidence or contradictory experiences.<n>EA-MDP aims to understand and control EA in decision-making processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T08:54:31Z)
• Agentic LLM Framework for Adaptive Decision Discourse [2.4919169815423743]
  This study introduces a real-world inspired agentic Large Language Models (LLMs) framework.<n>Unlike traditional decision-support tools, the framework emphasizes dialogue, trade-off exploration, and the emergent synergies generated by interactions among agents.<n>Results reveal how the breadth-first exploration of alternatives fosters robust and equitable recommendation pathways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T03:46:37Z)
• Sequential Manipulation Against Rank Aggregation: Theory and Algorithm [119.57122943187086]
  We leverage an online attack on the vulnerable data collection process. From the game-theoretic perspective, the confrontation scenario is formulated as a distributionally robust game. The proposed method manipulates the results of rank aggregation methods in a sequential manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T03:31:21Z)
• Optimising Human-AI Collaboration by Learning Convincing Explanations [62.81395661556852]
  We propose a method for a collaborative system that remains safe by having a human making decisions. Ardent enables efficient and effective decision-making by adapting to individual preferences for explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T16:00:16Z)
• Online Decision Mediation [72.80902932543474]
  Consider learning a decision support assistant to serve as an intermediary between (oracle) expert behavior and (imperfect) human behavior. In clinical diagnosis, fully-autonomous machine behavior is often beyond ethical affordances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T05:59:43Z)
• Probabilistic Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Formal Interpretability [2.990411348977783]
  We propose a novel Adaptive Wasserstein Variational Optimization, namely AWaVO, to tackle these interpretability challenges. Our approach uses formal methods to achieve the interpretability for convergence guarantee, training transparency, and intrinsic decision-interpretation. In comparison with state-of-theart benchmarks including TRPO-IPO, PCPO and CRPO, we empirically verify that AWaVO offers a reasonable trade-off between high performance and sufficient interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T22:52:22Z)
• On the Complexity of Adversarial Decision Making [101.14158787665252]
  We show that the Decision-Estimation Coefficient is necessary and sufficient to obtain low regret for adversarial decision making. We provide new structural results that connect the Decision-Estimation Coefficient to variants of other well-known complexity measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T06:20:37Z)
• An Autonomous Negotiating Agent Framework with Reinforcement Learning Based Strategies and Adaptive Strategy Switching Mechanism [3.4376560669160394]
  This work focuses on solving the problem of expert selection and adapting to the opponent's behaviour with our Autonomous Negotiating Agent Framework. Our framework has a reviewer component which enables self-enhancement capability by deciding to include new strategies or replace old ones with better strategies periodically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-06T14:38:03Z)
• End-to-End Learning and Intervention in Games [60.41921763076017]
  We provide a unified framework for learning and intervention in games. We propose two approaches, respectively based on explicit and implicit differentiation. The analytical results are validated using several real-world problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T18:39:32Z)
• Optimal Inspection and Maintenance Planning for Deteriorating Structural Components through Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Markov Decision Processes [0.0]
  Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) provide a mathematical methodology for optimal control under uncertain action outcomes and observations. We provide the formulation for developing both infinite and finite horizon POMDPs in a structural reliability context. Results show that POMDPs achieve substantially lower costs as compared to their counterparts, even for traditional problem settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-09T20:03:42Z)
• Efficient Empowerment Estimation for Unsupervised Stabilization [75.32013242448151]
  empowerment principle enables unsupervised stabilization of dynamical systems at upright positions. We propose an alternative solution based on a trainable representation of a dynamical system as a Gaussian channel. We show that our method has a lower sample complexity, is more stable in training, possesses the essential properties of the empowerment function, and allows estimation of empowerment from images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T21:10:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.