Self-Corrective Task Planning by Inverse Prompting with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07317v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:35:51 GMT
• Title: Self-Corrective Task Planning by Inverse Prompting with Large Language Models
• Authors: Jiho Lee, Hayun Lee, Jonghyeon Kim, Kyungjae Lee, Eunwoo Kim,
• Abstract summary: We introduce InversePrompt, a novel self-corrective task planning approach.<n>Our method incorporates reasoning steps to provide clear, interpretable feedback.<n>Results on benchmark datasets show an average 16.3% higher success rate over existing LLM-based task planning methods.
• Score: 9.283971287618261
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In robot task planning, large language models (LLMs) have shown significant promise in generating complex and long-horizon action sequences. However, it is observed that LLMs often produce responses that sound plausible but are not accurate. To address these problems, existing methods typically employ predefined error sets or external knowledge sources, requiring human efforts and computation resources. Recently, self-correction approaches have emerged, where LLM generates and refines plans, identifying errors by itself. Despite their effectiveness, they are more prone to failures in correction due to insufficient reasoning. In this paper, we introduce InversePrompt, a novel self-corrective task planning approach that leverages inverse prompting to enhance interpretability. Our method incorporates reasoning steps to provide clear, interpretable feedback. It generates inverse actions corresponding to the initially generated actions and verifies whether these inverse actions can restore the system to its original state, explicitly validating the logical coherence of the generated plans.The results on benchmark datasets show an average 16.3% higher success rate over existing LLM-based task planning methods. Our approach offers clearer justifications for feedback in real-world environments, resulting in more successful task completion than existing self-correction approaches across various scenarios.

Related papers

• Self-Steering Language Models [113.96916935955842]
  DisCIPL is a method for "self-steering" language models. DisCIPL uses a Planner model to generate a task-specific inference program. Our work opens up a design space of highly-parallelized Monte Carlo inference strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T17:54:22Z)
• Complex LLM Planning via Automated Heuristics Discovery [48.07520536415374]
  We consider enhancing large language models (LLMs) for complex planning tasks.<n>We propose automated inferences discovery (AutoHD), a novel approach that enables LLMs to explicitly generate functions to guide-time search.<n>Our proposed method requires no additional model training or finetuning--and the explicit definition of functions generated by the LLMs provides interpretability and insights into the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T16:52:31Z)
• Automated Refactoring of Non-Idiomatic Python Code: A Differentiated Replication with LLMs [54.309127753635366]
  We present the results of a replication study in which we investigate GPT-4 effectiveness in recommending and suggesting idiomatic actions.<n>Our findings underscore the potential of LLMs to achieve tasks where, in the past, implementing recommenders based on complex code analyses was required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T15:41:54Z)
• Non-myopic Generation of Language Models for Reasoning and Planning [45.75146679449453]
  This paper proposes a novel method, Predictive-Decoding, that leverages Model Predictive Control to enhance planning accuracy. Our experiments show significant improvements in a wide range of tasks for math, coding, and agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T17:13:38Z)
• Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification [52.095460362197336]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with consistent and accurate reasoning. LLMs are trained primarily on correct solutions, reducing their ability to detect and learn from errors. We propose a novel collaborative method integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) solutions for verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T05:21:48Z)
• Evaluating Uncertainty-based Failure Detection for Closed-Loop LLM Planners [10.746821861109176]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have witnessed remarkable performance as zero-shot task planners for robotic tasks. However, the open-loop nature of previous works makes LLM-based planning error-prone and fragile. In this work, we introduce a framework for closed-loop LLM-based planning called KnowLoop, backed by an uncertainty-based MLLMs failure detector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T12:52:06Z)
• A Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Model for Fast and Slow System Manipulation [30.207690822989292]
  Self-corrected (SC-)VLA framework integrates fast system for directly predicting actions and slow system for reflecting on failed actions. For the fast system, we incorporate parameter-efficient fine-tuning to equip the model with pose prediction capabilities. For the slow system, we propose a Chain-of-Thought training strategy for failure correction, designed to mimic human reflection after a manipulation failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:58:48Z)
• Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models [63.06270302774049]
  Tree-Planner reframes task planning with Large Language Models into three distinct phases. Tree-Planner achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining high efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:59:50Z)
• Can Large Language Models Really Improve by Self-critiquing Their Own Plans? [19.476470154121188]
  We investigate the verification/self-critiquing abilities of large language models in the context of planning. Using GPT-4, a state-of-the-art LLM, for both generation and verification, our findings reveal that self-critiquing appears to diminish plan generation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T08:22:37Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)
• SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting [68.40726892904286]
  We propose a new satisfiability-aided language modeling (SatLM) approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We use an LLM to generate a declarative task specification rather than an imperative program and leverage an off-the-shelf automated theorem prover to derive the final answer. We evaluate SATLM on 8 different datasets and show that it consistently outperforms program-aided LMs in the imperative paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:55:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.