Blockchain As a Platform For Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08699v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 01:57:26 GMT
• Title: Blockchain As a Platform For Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency
• Authors: Afroja Akther, Ayesha Arobee, Abdullah Al Adnan, Omum Auyon, ASM Johirul Islam, Farhad Akter,
• Abstract summary: "Black box" problem in AI decision-making limits stakeholders' ability to understand, trust, and verify outcomes.<n>This paper explores the integration of blockchain with AI to improve decision traceability, provenance data, and model accountability.<n>Findings suggest that blockchain could be a technology for ensuring AI systems remain accountable, ethical, and aligned with regulatory standards.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly complex and autonomous, concerns over transparency and accountability have intensified. The "black box" problem in AI decision-making limits stakeholders' ability to understand, trust, and verify outcomes, particularly in high-stakes sectors such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems. Blockchain technology, with its decentralized, immutable, and transparent characteristics, presents a potential solution to enhance AI transparency and auditability. This paper explores the integration of blockchain with AI to improve decision traceability, data provenance, and model accountability. By leveraging blockchain as an immutable record-keeping system, AI decision-making can become more interpretable, fostering trust among users and regulatory compliance. However, challenges such as scalability, integration complexity, and computational overhead must be addressed to fully realize this synergy. This study discusses existing research, proposes a framework for blockchain-enhanced AI transparency, and highlights practical applications, benefits, and limitations. The findings suggest that blockchain could be a foundational technology for ensuring AI systems remain accountable, ethical, and aligned with regulatory standards.

Related papers

• Infusion of Blockchain to Establish Trustworthiness in AI Supported Software Evolution: A Systematic Literature Review [0.3437656066916039]
  Most studies focus on integrating AI in software engineering (SE), with only 31% explicitly addressing trustworthiness.<n>Our review highlights six recent studies exploring blockchain-based approaches to reinforce reliability, transparency, and accountability in AI-assisted SE tasks.<n>Future work must develop measurable, reproducible trust frameworks to enable reliable, secure, and compliant AI-driven SE ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T18:36:50Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Ethical AI: Towards Defining a Collective Evaluation Framework [0.3413711585591077]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming sectors such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems.<n>Yet its rapid integration raises urgent ethical concerns related to data ownership, privacy, and systemic bias.<n>This article proposes a modular ethical assessment framework built on ontological blocks of meaning-discrete, interpretable units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T21:10:47Z)
• Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
  This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• AI-Based Crypto Tokens: The Illusion of Decentralized AI? [0.10878040851637999]
  AI-tokens are cryptographic assets designed to power decentralized AI platforms and services.<n>This paper provides a comprehensive review of leading AI-token projects.<n>We assess the extent to which they offer value beyond traditional centralized AI services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T13:44:33Z)
• A Blockchain-Enabled Approach to Cross-Border Compliance and Trust [0.0]
  This paper proposes a novel approach to AI governance, utilizing blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLT)<n>By synthesizing advancements in blockchain, AI ethics, and cybersecurity, this paper offers a comprehensive roadmap for a decentralized AI governance framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T22:19:34Z)
• SoK: Decentralized AI (DeAI) [4.651101982820699]
  We present a Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) for blockchain-based DeAI solutions.<n>We propose a taxonomy to classify existing DeAI protocols based on the model lifecycle.<n>We investigate how blockchain features contribute to enhancing the security, transparency, and trustworthiness of AI processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T14:28:25Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom. While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems. We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Enhancing Data Integrity and Traceability in Industry Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS) through Blockchain Technology: A Comprehensive Approach [0.0]
  This study explores the potential of blockchain in enhancing data integrity and traceability within Industry Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS) ICPS is pivotal in managing critical infrastructure like manufacturing, power grids, and transportation networks. This research unearths various blockchain applications in ICPS, including supply chain management, quality control, contract management, and data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T06:22:37Z)
• opp/ai: Optimistic Privacy-Preserving AI on Blockchain [0.0]
  The Optimistic Privacy-Preserving AI (opp/ai) framework is introduced as a pioneering solution to these issues. The framework integrates Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning (zkML) for privacy with Optimistic Machine Learning (opML) for efficiency. This study presents the opp/ai framework, delves into the privacy features of zkML, and assesses the framework's performance and adaptability across different scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T22:54:41Z)
• Generative AI-enabled Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Study [73.87110604150315]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a promising solution to address challenges of blockchain technology. In this paper, we first introduce GAI techniques, outline their applications, and discuss existing solutions for integrating GAI into blockchains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T10:46:17Z)
• Mathematical Algorithm Design for Deep Learning under Societal and Judicial Constraints: The Algorithmic Transparency Requirement [65.26723285209853]
  We derive a framework to analyze whether a transparent implementation in a computing model is feasible. Based on previous results, we find that Blum-Shub-Smale Machines have the potential to establish trustworthy solvers for inverse problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T15:32:38Z)
• Path To Gain Functional Transparency In Artificial Intelligence With Meaningful Explainability [0.0]
  As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, ensuring their transparency and explainability becomes crucial.<n>We propose a design for user-centered compliant-by-design transparency in transparent systems.<n>By providing a comprehensive understanding of the challenges associated with transparency in AI systems, we aim to facilitate the development of AI systems that are accountable, trustworthy, and aligned with societal values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T04:25:30Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices [44.67324097900778]
  Many current AI systems were found vulnerable to imperceptible attacks, biased against underrepresented groups, lacking in user privacy protection, etc. In this review, we strive to provide AI practitioners a comprehensive guide towards building trustworthy AI systems. To unify the current fragmented approaches towards trustworthy AI, we propose a systematic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T03:20:39Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.