ExDDV: A New Dataset for Explainable Deepfake Detection in Video

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14421v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:55:07 GMT
• Title: ExDDV: A New Dataset for Explainable Deepfake Detection in Video
• Authors: Vlad Hondru, Eduard Hogea, Darian Onchis, Radu Tudor Ionescu,
• Abstract summary: We introduce ExDDV, the first dataset and benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection in Video.<n>We evaluate a number of vision-language models on ExDDV, performing experiments with various fine-tuning and in-context learning strategies.<n>Our results show that text and click supervision are both required to develop robust explainable models for deepfake videos.
• Score: 23.169975307069066
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The ever growing realism and quality of generated videos makes it increasingly harder for humans to spot deepfake content, who need to rely more and more on automatic deepfake detectors. However, deepfake detectors are also prone to errors, and their decisions are not explainable, leaving humans vulnerable to deepfake-based fraud and misinformation. To this end, we introduce ExDDV, the first dataset and benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection in Video. ExDDV comprises around 5.4K real and deepfake videos that are manually annotated with text descriptions (to explain the artifacts) and clicks (to point out the artifacts). We evaluate a number of vision-language models on ExDDV, performing experiments with various fine-tuning and in-context learning strategies. Our results show that text and click supervision are both required to develop robust explainable models for deepfake videos, which are able to localize and describe the observed artifacts. Our novel dataset and code to reproduce the results are available at https://github.com/vladhondru25/ExDDV.

Related papers

• Deepfake Media Generation and Detection in the Generative AI Era: A Survey and Outlook [101.30779332427217]
  We survey deepfake generation and detection techniques, including the most recent developments in the field.<n>We identify various kinds of deepfakes, according to the procedure used to alter or generate the fake content.<n>We develop a novel multimodal benchmark to evaluate deepfake detectors on out-of-distribution content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T08:29:25Z)
• Deepfake detection in videos with multiple faces using geometric-fakeness features [79.16635054977068]
  Deepfakes of victims or public figures can be used by fraudsters for blackmailing, extorsion and financial fraud. In our research we propose to use geometric-fakeness features (GFF) that characterize a dynamic degree of a face presence in a video. We employ our approach to analyze videos with multiple faces that are simultaneously present in a video.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T13:10:34Z)
• Shaking the Fake: Detecting Deepfake Videos in Real Time via Active Probes [3.6308756891251392]
  Real-time deepfake, a type of generative AI, is capable of "creating" non-existing contents (e.g., swapping one's face with another) in a video. It has been misused to produce deepfake videos for malicious purposes, including financial scams and political misinformation. We propose SFake, a new real-time deepfake detection method that exploits deepfake models' inability to adapt to physical interference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T04:58:30Z)
• Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakes [49.81915942821647]
  This paper aims to evaluate the human ability to discern deepfake videos through a subjective study. We present our findings by comparing human observers to five state-ofthe-art audiovisual deepfake detection models. We found that all AI models performed better than humans when evaluated on the same 40 videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T07:57:15Z)
• Undercover Deepfakes: Detecting Fake Segments in Videos [1.2609216345578933]
  deepfake generation is a new paradigm of deepfakes which are mostly real videos altered slightly to distort the truth. In this paper, we present a deepfake detection method that can address this issue by performing deepfake prediction at the frame and video levels. In particular, the paradigm we address will form a powerful tool for the moderation of deepfakes, where human oversight can be better targeted to the parts of videos suspected of being deepfakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T04:43:10Z)
• DeePhy: On Deepfake Phylogeny [58.01631614114075]
  DeePhy is a novel Deepfake Phylogeny dataset which consists of 5040 deepfake videos generated using three different generation techniques. We present the benchmark on DeePhy dataset using six deepfake detection algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T15:30:33Z)
• Voice-Face Homogeneity Tells Deepfake [56.334968246631725]
  Existing detection approaches contribute to exploring the specific artifacts in deepfake videos. We propose to perform the deepfake detection from an unexplored voice-face matching view. Our model obtains significantly improved performance as compared to other state-of-the-art competitors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T09:08:50Z)
• What's wrong with this video? Comparing Explainers for Deepfake Detection [13.089182408360221]
  Deepfakes are computer manipulated videos where the face of an individual has been replaced with that of another. In this work we develop, extend and compare white-box, black-box and model-specific techniques for explaining the labelling of real and fake videos. In particular, we adapt SHAP, GradCAM and self-attention models to the task of explaining the predictions of state-of-the-art detectors based on EfficientNet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T18:44:39Z)
• WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detection [82.42495493102805]
  We introduce a new dataset WildDeepfake which consists of 7,314 face sequences extracted from 707 deepfake videos collected completely from the internet. We conduct a systematic evaluation of a set of baseline detection networks on both existing and our WildDeepfake datasets, and show that WildDeepfake is indeed a more challenging dataset, where the detection performance can decrease drastically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-05T11:10:32Z)
• Deepfake detection: humans vs. machines [4.485016243130348]
  We present a subjective study conducted in a crowdsourcing-like scenario, which systematically evaluates how hard it is for humans to see if the video is deepfake or not. For each video, a simple question: "Is face of the person in the video real of fake?" was answered on average by 19 na"ive subjects. The evaluation demonstrates that while the human perception is very different from the perception of a machine, both successfully but in different ways are fooled by deepfakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T15:20:37Z)
• Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examples [23.695497512694068]
  Recent advances in video manipulation techniques have made the generation of fake videos more accessible than ever before. Manipulated videos can fuel disinformation and reduce trust in media. Recent developed Deepfake detection methods rely on deep neural networks (DNNs) to distinguish AI-generated fake videos from real videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T07:10:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.