Rude Humans and Vengeful Robots: Examining Human Perceptions of Robot Retaliatory Intentions in Professional Settings
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16932v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:12:40 GMT
- Title: Rude Humans and Vengeful Robots: Examining Human Perceptions of Robot Retaliatory Intentions in Professional Settings
- Authors: Kate Letheren, Nicole Robinson,
- Abstract summary: This paper reports the results of a 2x3 online experiment that used a unique first-person perspective video to immerse participants in a collaborative workplace setting.<n>Results are nuanced and reveal that while robots are expected to act in accordance with social expectations despite human behavior, there are benefits for robots perceived as being the bigger person in the face of human rudeness.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Humans and robots are increasingly working in personal and professional settings. In workplace settings, humans and robots may work together as colleagues, potentially leading to social expectations, or violation thereof. Extant research has primarily sought to understand social interactions and expectations in personal rather than professional settings, and none of these studies have examined negative outcomes arising from violations of social expectations. This paper reports the results of a 2x3 online experiment that used a unique first-person perspective video to immerse participants in a collaborative workplace setting. The results are nuanced and reveal that while robots are expected to act in accordance with social expectations despite human behavior, there are benefits for robots perceived as being the bigger person in the face of human rudeness. Theoretical and practical implications are provided which discuss the import of these findings for the design of social robots.
Related papers
- Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots [0.0]
The study systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures.
Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations.
The study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T11:00:11Z) - Habitat 3.0: A Co-Habitat for Humans, Avatars and Robots [119.55240471433302]
Habitat 3.0 is a simulation platform for studying collaborative human-robot tasks in home environments.
It addresses challenges in modeling complex deformable bodies and diversity in appearance and motion.
Human-in-the-loop infrastructure enables real human interaction with simulated robots via mouse/keyboard or a VR interface.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T17:29:17Z) - Proceeding of the 1st Workshop on Social Robots Personalisation At the
crossroads between engineering and humanities (CONCATENATE) [37.838596863193565]
This workshop aims to raise an interdisciplinary discussion on personalisation in robotics.
It aims at bringing researchers from different fields together to propose guidelines for personalisation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T11:11:24Z) - SACSoN: Scalable Autonomous Control for Social Navigation [62.59274275261392]
We develop methods for training policies for socially unobtrusive navigation.
By minimizing this counterfactual perturbation, we can induce robots to behave in ways that do not alter the natural behavior of humans in the shared space.
We collect a large dataset where an indoor mobile robot interacts with human bystanders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T19:07:52Z) - Learning Latent Representations to Co-Adapt to Humans [12.71953776723672]
Non-stationary humans are challenging for robot learners.
In this paper we introduce an algorithmic formalism that enables robots to co-adapt alongside dynamic humans.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-19T16:19:24Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [64.77385130665128]
The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots.
We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-07T11:12:45Z) - Data-driven emotional body language generation for social robotics [58.88028813371423]
In social robotics, endowing humanoid robots with the ability to generate bodily expressions of affect can improve human-robot interaction and collaboration.
We implement a deep learning data-driven framework that learns from a few hand-designed robotic bodily expressions.
The evaluation study found that the anthropomorphism and animacy of the generated expressions are not perceived differently from the hand-designed ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-02T09:21:39Z) - AAAI SSS-22 Symposium on Closing the Assessment Loop: Communicating
Proficiency and Intent in Human-Robot Teaming [4.787322716745613]
How should a robot convey predicted ability on a new task?
How should a robot adapt its proficiency criteria based on human intentions and values?
There are no agreed upon standards for evaluating proficiency and intent-based interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-05T18:28:01Z) - Doing Right by Not Doing Wrong in Human-Robot Collaboration [8.078753289996417]
We propose a novel approach to learning fair and sociable behavior, not by reproducing positive behavior, but rather by avoiding negative behavior.
In this study, we highlight the importance of incorporating sociability in robot manipulation, as well as the need to consider fairness in human-robot interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-05T23:05:10Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [65.60507052509406]
The aim of this workshop is to give researchers from academia and industry the possibility to discuss the inter-and multi-disciplinary nature of the relationships between people and robots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-23T16:52:12Z) - Joint Mind Modeling for Explanation Generation in Complex Human-Robot
Collaborative Tasks [83.37025218216888]
We propose a novel explainable AI (XAI) framework for achieving human-like communication in human-robot collaborations.
The robot builds a hierarchical mind model of the human user and generates explanations of its own mind as a form of communications.
Results show that the generated explanations of our approach significantly improves the collaboration performance and user perception of the robot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-24T23:35:03Z) - Human Perception of Intrinsically Motivated Autonomy in Human-Robot
Interaction [2.485182034310304]
A challenge in using robots in human-inhabited environments is to design behavior that is engaging, yet robust to the perturbations induced by human interaction.
Our idea is to imbue the robot with intrinsic motivation (IM) so that it can handle new situations and appears as a genuine social other to humans.
This article presents a "robotologist" study design that allows comparing autonomously generated behaviors with each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-14T09:49:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.