When Words Outperform Vision: VLMs Can Self-Improve Via Text-Only Training For Human-Centered Decision Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16965v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:25:23 GMT
• Title: When Words Outperform Vision: VLMs Can Self-Improve Via Text-Only Training For Human-Centered Decision Making
• Authors: Zhe Hu, Jing Li, Yu Yin,
• Abstract summary: Embodied decision-making is fundamental for AI agents operating in real-world environments.<n>In this study, we evaluate open-sourced Visual Language Models (VLMs) on multimodal human-centered decision-making tasks.
• Score: 15.397582422113627
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Embodied decision-making is fundamental for AI agents operating in real-world environments. While Visual Language Models (VLMs) have advanced this capability, they still struggle with complex decisions, particularly in human-centered situations that require deep reasoning about human needs and values. In this study, we systematically evaluate open-sourced VLMs on multimodal human-centered decision-making tasks. We find that LLMs receiving only textual descriptions unexpectedly outperform their VLM counterparts of similar scale that process actual images, suggesting that visual alignment may hinder VLM abilities. To address this challenge, we propose a novel text-only training approach with synthesized textual data. This method strengthens VLMs' language components and transfers the learned abilities to multimodal inference, eliminating the need for expensive image-text paired data. Furthermore, we show that VLMs can achieve substantial performance gains through self-improvement, using training data generated by their LLM counterparts rather than relying on larger teacher models like GPT-4. Our findings establish a more efficient and scalable approach to enhancing VLMs' human-centered decision-making capabilities, opening new avenues for optimizing VLMs through self-improvement mechanisms.

Related papers

• Reflective Planning: Vision-Language Models for Multi-Stage Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation [90.00687889213991]
  Solving complex long-horizon robotic manipulation problems requires sophisticated high-level planning capabilities. Vision-language models (VLMs) pretrained on Internet data could in principle offer a framework for tackling such problems. In this paper, we introduce a novel test-time framework that enhancesVLMs' physical reasoning capabilities for multi-stage manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T20:42:15Z)
• Preference VLM: Leveraging VLMs for Scalable Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [17.59802090014789]
  We introduce PrefVLM, a framework that integrates Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with selective human feedback.<n>Our method leverages VLMs to generate initial preference labels, which are then filtered to identify uncertain cases for targeted human annotation.<n> Experiments on Meta-World manipulation tasks demonstrate that PrefVLM achieves comparable or superior success rates to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:50:15Z)
• Improving Fine-grained Visual Understanding in VLMs through Text-Only Training [0.0]
  We investigate the feasibility of enhancing fine-grained visual understanding in Visual-Language Models (VLMs) through text-only training.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments on two distinct domains: fine-grained species classification and cultural visual understanding tasks.<n>Our findings demonstrate that text-only training can be comparable to conventional image-text training while significantly reducing computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T14:18:50Z)
• Enhancing Instruction-Following Capability of Visual-Language Models by Reducing Image Redundancy [37.471419716572086]
  There is a significant gap in instruction-following capabilities between Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We propose Visual-Modality Token Compression (VMTC) and Cross-Modality Attention Inhibition (CMAI) strategies to alleviate this gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T05:03:32Z)
• Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learning [79.38140606606126]
  We propose an algorithmic framework that fine-tunes vision-language models (VLMs) with reinforcement learning (RL) Our framework provides a task description and then prompts the VLM to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. We demonstrate that our proposed framework enhances the decision-making capabilities of VLM agents across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:50:19Z)
• Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing [56.75702900542643]
  We introduce AlphaLLM for the self-improvements of Large Language Models. It integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with LLMs to establish a self-improving loop. Our experimental results show that AlphaLLM significantly enhances the performance of LLMs without additional annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T15:21:34Z)
• MOKA: Open-World Robotic Manipulation through Mark-Based Visual Prompting [97.52388851329667]
  We introduce Marking Open-world Keypoint Affordances (MOKA) to solve robotic manipulation tasks specified by free-form language instructions. Central to our approach is a compact point-based representation of affordance, which bridges the VLM's predictions on observed images and the robot's actions in the physical world. We evaluate and analyze MOKA's performance on various table-top manipulation tasks including tool use, deformable body manipulation, and object rearrangement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T18:08:45Z)
• Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions [11.786387517781328]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are advanced models that can tackle more intricate tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Our classification organizes VLMs into three distinct categories: models dedicated to vision-language understanding, models that process multimodal inputs to generate unimodal (textual) outputs and models that both accept and produce multimodal inputs and outputs. We meticulously dissect each model, offering an extensive analysis of its foundational architecture, training data sources, as well as its strengths and limitations wherever possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:57:34Z)
• LMRL Gym: Benchmarks for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning with Language Models [56.25156596019168]
  This paper introduces the LMRL-Gym benchmark for evaluating multi-turn RL for large language models (LLMs) Our benchmark consists of 8 different language tasks, which require multiple rounds of language interaction and cover a range of tasks in open-ended dialogue and text games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T03:59:31Z)
• Sight Beyond Text: Multi-Modal Training Enhances LLMs in Truthfulness and Ethics [32.123919380959485]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) are trained based on large language models (LLM) While they excel in multi-modal tasks, the pure NLP abilities of MLLMs are often underestimated and left untested. We show that visual instruction tuning, a prevailing strategy for transitioning LLMs into MLLMs, unexpectedly and interestingly helps models attain both improved truthfulness and ethical alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T17:57:21Z)
• TouchStone: Evaluating Vision-Language Models by Language Models [91.69776377214814]
  We propose an evaluation method that uses strong large language models as judges to comprehensively evaluate the various abilities of LVLMs. We construct a comprehensive visual dialogue dataset TouchStone, consisting of open-world images and questions, covering five major categories of abilities and 27 subtasks. We demonstrate that powerful LVLMs, such as GPT-4, can effectively score dialogue quality by leveraging their textual capabilities alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T17:52:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.