Smoke and Mirrors: Jailbreaking LLM-based Code Generation via Implicit Malicious Prompts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17953v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:06:12 GMT
• Title: Smoke and Mirrors: Jailbreaking LLM-based Code Generation via Implicit Malicious Prompts
• Authors: Sheng Ouyang, Yihao Qin, Bo Lin, Liqian Chen, Xiaoguang Mao, Shangwen Wang,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a jailbreaking approach, CodeJailbreaker, designed to uncover safety concerns in code generation.<n> Experiments on the recently-released RMCBench benchmark demonstrate that CodeJailbreaker markedly surpasses the conventional jailbreaking strategy.
• Score: 5.718926328180089
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized natural language processing and significantly impacted code generation tasks, enhancing software development efficiency and productivity. Notably, LLMs like GPT-4 have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in text-to-code generation tasks. However, the growing reliance on LLMs for code generation necessitates a critical examination of the safety implications associated with their outputs. Existing research efforts have primarily focused on verifying the functional correctness of LLMs, overlooking their safety in code generation. This paper introduces a jailbreaking approach, CodeJailbreaker, designed to uncover safety concerns in LLM-based code generation. The basic observation is that existing safety mechanisms for LLMs are built through the instruction-following paradigm, where malicious intent is explicitly articulated within the instruction of the prompt. Consequently, CodeJailbreaker explores to construct a prompt whose instruction is benign and the malicious intent is implicitly encoded in a covert channel, i.e., the commit message, to bypass the safety mechanism. Experiments on the recently-released RMCBench benchmark demonstrate that CodeJailbreaker markedly surpasses the conventional jailbreaking strategy, which explicitly conveys malicious intents in the instructions, in terms of the attack effectiveness across three code generation tasks. This study challenges the traditional safety paradigms in LLM-based code generation, emphasizing the need for enhanced safety measures in safeguarding against implicit malicious cues.

Related papers

• Look Before You Leap: Enhancing Attention and Vigilance Regarding Harmful Content with GuidelineLLM [53.79753074854936]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to emerging jailbreak attacks.<n>This vulnerability poses significant risks to the real-world applications.<n>We propose a novel defensive paradigm called GuidelineLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T12:42:33Z)
• RTL-Breaker: Assessing the Security of LLMs against Backdoor Attacks on HDL Code Generation [17.53405545690049]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential with code generation/completion tasks for hardware design. LLMs are susceptible to so-called data poisoning or backdoor attacks. Here, attackers inject malicious code for the training data, which can be carried over into the HDL code generated by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T16:31:18Z)
• Jailbreaking Large Language Models Through Alignment Vulnerabilities in Out-of-Distribution Settings [57.136748215262884]
  We introduce ObscurePrompt for jailbreaking LLMs, inspired by the observed fragile alignments in Out-of-Distribution (OOD) data. We first formulate the decision boundary in the jailbreaking process and then explore how obscure text affects LLM's ethical decision boundary. Our approach substantially improves upon previous methods in terms of attack effectiveness, maintaining efficacy against two prevalent defense mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T16:09:58Z)
• Can We Trust Large Language Models Generated Code? A Framework for In-Context Learning, Security Patterns, and Code Evaluations Across Diverse LLMs [2.7138982369416866]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized automated code generation in software engineering. However, concerns have arisen regarding the security and quality of the generated code. Our research aims to tackle these issues by introducing a framework for secure behavioral learning of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T11:29:34Z)
• How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden States [65.45603614354329]
  Large language models (LLMs) rely on safety alignment to avoid responding to malicious user inputs. Jailbreak can circumvent safety guardrails, resulting in LLMs generating harmful content. We employ weak classifiers to explain LLM safety through the intermediate hidden states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T05:04:37Z)
• Constrained Decoding for Secure Code Generation [9.007821185927277]
  This paper introduces a new benchmark, CodeGuard+, to measure Code LLMs' ability to generate both secure and correct code. We show that the state-of-the-art defense technique, prefix tuning, may not be as strong as previously believed, since it generates secure code but sacrifices functional correctness. We propose new constrained decoding techniques to generate secure code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T21:52:19Z)
• CodeAttack: Revealing Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code Completion [117.178835165855]
  This paper introduces CodeAttack, a framework that transforms natural language inputs into code inputs. Our studies reveal a new and universal safety vulnerability of these models against code input. We find that a larger distribution gap between CodeAttack and natural language leads to weaker safety generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T17:55:38Z)
• CodeChameleon: Personalized Encryption Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [49.60006012946767]
  We propose CodeChameleon, a novel jailbreak framework based on personalized encryption tactics. We conduct extensive experiments on 7 Large Language Models, achieving state-of-the-art average Attack Success Rate (ASR) Remarkably, our method achieves an 86.6% ASR on GPT-4-1106.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T16:35:59Z)
• DeceptPrompt: Exploiting LLM-driven Code Generation via Adversarial Natural Language Instructions [27.489622263456983]
  We introduce DeceptPrompt, an algorithm that can generate adversarial natural language instructions that drive the Code LLMs to generate functionality correct code with vulnerabilities. When applying the optimized prefix/suffix, the attack success rate (ASR) will improve by average 50% compared with no prefix/suffix applying.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T22:19:06Z)
• SALLM: Security Assessment of Generated Code [0.5137309756089941]
  This paper describes SALLM, a framework to benchmark Large Language Models' abilities to generate secure code systematically. The framework has three major components: a novel dataset of security-centric Python prompts, assessment techniques to evaluate the generated code, and novel metrics to evaluate the models' performance from the perspective of secure code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T22:46:31Z)
• Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
  Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users. Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs. We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.