Statistically Testing Training Data for Unwanted Error Patterns using Rule-Oriented Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18497v2
• Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 13:34:59 GMT
• Title: Statistically Testing Training Data for Unwanted Error Patterns using Rule-Oriented Regression
• Authors: Stefan Rass, Martin Dallinger,
• Abstract summary: We provide a method to test training data for flaws, to establish a trustworthy ground-truth for a subsequent training of machine learning models.<n>Our approach extends the abilities of conventional statistical testing by letting the test-condition'' be any condition to describe a pattern in the data.<n>We provide an open source implementation for demonstration and experiments.
• Score: 0.5831737970661137
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence models trained from data can only be as good as the underlying data is. Biases in training data propagating through to the output of a machine learning model are a well-documented and well-understood phenomenon, but the machinery to prevent these undesired effects is much less developed. Efforts to ensure data is clean during collection, such as using bias-aware sampling, are most effective when the entity controlling data collection also trains the AI. In cases where the data is already available, how do we find out if the data was already manipulated, i.e., ``poisoned'', so that an undesired behavior would be trained into a machine learning model? This is a challenge fundamentally different to (just) improving approximation accuracy or efficiency, and we provide a method to test training data for flaws, to establish a trustworthy ground-truth for a subsequent training of machine learning models (of any kind). Unlike the well-studied problem of approximating data using fuzzy rules that are generated from the data, our method hinges on a prior definition of rules to happen before seeing the data to be tested. Therefore, the proposed method can also discover hidden error patterns, which may also have substantial influence. Our approach extends the abilities of conventional statistical testing by letting the ``test-condition'' be any Boolean condition to describe a pattern in the data, whose presence we wish to determine. The method puts fuzzy inference into a regression model, to get the best of the two: explainability from fuzzy logic with statistical properties and diagnostics from the regression, and finally also being applicable to ``small data'', hence not requiring large datasets as deep learning methods do. We provide an open source implementation for demonstration and experiments.

Related papers

• Hessian-Free Online Certified Unlearning [8.875278412741695]
  We develop an online unlearning algorithm that achieves near-instantaneous data removal.<n>We prove that our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of the unlearning and generalization guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T07:54:18Z)
• Corrective Machine Unlearning [22.342035149807923]
  We formalize Corrective Machine Unlearning as the problem of mitigating the impact of data affected by unknown manipulations on a trained model. We find most existing unlearning methods, including retraining-from-scratch without the deletion set, require most of the manipulated data to be identified for effective corrective unlearning. One approach, Selective Synaptic Dampening, achieves limited success, unlearning adverse effects with just a small portion of the manipulated samples in our setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T18:54:37Z)
• Mendata: A Framework to Purify Manipulated Training Data [12.406255198638064]
  We propose Mendata, a framework to purify manipulated training data. Mendata perturbs the training inputs so that they retain their utility but are distributed similarly to the reference data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Mendata by applying it to defeat state-of-the-art data poisoning and data tracing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T04:40:08Z)
• AI Model Disgorgement: Methods and Choices [127.54319351058167]
  We introduce a taxonomy of possible disgorgement methods that are applicable to modern machine learning systems. We investigate the meaning of "removing the effects" of data in the trained model in a way that does not require retraining from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T08:50:18Z)
• Learning to Unlearn: Instance-wise Unlearning for Pre-trained Classifiers [71.70205894168039]
  We consider instance-wise unlearning, of which the goal is to delete information on a set of instances from a pre-trained model. We propose two methods that reduce forgetting on the remaining data: 1) utilizing adversarial examples to overcome forgetting at the representation-level and 2) leveraging weight importance metrics to pinpoint network parameters guilty of propagating unwanted information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T07:53:50Z)
• Information FOMO: The unhealthy fear of missing out on information. A method for removing misleading data for healthier models [0.0]
  Misleading or unnecessary data can have out-sized impacts on the health or accuracy of Machine Learning (ML) models. We present a sequential selection method that identifies critically important information within a dataset. We find these instabilities are a result of the complexity of the underlying map and linked to extreme events and heavy tails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-27T19:43:53Z)
• CAFA: Class-Aware Feature Alignment for Test-Time Adaptation [50.26963784271912]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to address this challenge by adapting a model to unlabeled data at test time. We propose a simple yet effective feature alignment loss, termed as Class-Aware Feature Alignment (CAFA), which simultaneously encourages a model to learn target representations in a class-discriminative manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T03:02:07Z)
• Conformal prediction for the design problem [72.14982816083297]
  In many real-world deployments of machine learning, we use a prediction algorithm to choose what data to test next. In such settings, there is a distinct type of distribution shift between the training and test data. We introduce a method to quantify predictive uncertainty in such settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T02:59:12Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Managing dataset shift by adversarial validation for credit scoring [5.560471251954645]
  The inconsistency between the distribution of training data and the data that actually needs to be predicted is likely to cause poor model performance. We propose a method based on adversarial validation to alleviate the dataset shift problem in credit scoring scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T07:07:15Z)
• How Training Data Impacts Performance in Learning-based Control [67.7875109298865]
  This paper derives an analytical relationship between the density of the training data and the control performance. We formulate a quality measure for the data set, which we refer to as $rho$-gap. We show how the $rho$-gap can be applied to a feedback linearizing control law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T12:13:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.