The Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness Index (GARI): An Analysis of its Data and Overcoming Obstacles, with a Case Study of Iraq

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20833v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:26:07 GMT
• Title: The Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness Index (GARI): An Analysis of its Data and Overcoming Obstacles, with a Case Study of Iraq
• Authors: Ahmed Shaker Alalaq,
• Abstract summary: This research examines the "Government AI Readines Index" (GARI) issued by Oxford.<n>It highlights the evaluation criteria used to assess readiness, including technological infrastructure, human resources, supportive policies, and the level of innovation.<n>The study specifically focuses on Iraq, exploring the challenge the Iraqi government face in adopting and implementing AI technology.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This research examines the "Government AI Readines Index" (GARI) issued by Oxford, analyzing data on governmental preparedness for adopting artificial intelligence acros different countrie. It highlights the evaluation criteria used to assess readiness, including technological infrastructure, human resources, supportive policies, and the level of innovation. The study specifically focuses on Iraq, exploring the challenge the Iraqi government face in adopting and implementing AI technology. It discussed economic, social, and political barriers that hinder this transition and provides concrete recommendations to overcome these obstacle. By analyzing Iraq case, the research aims to offer insight into improving collaboration between the public and private sectors to enhance the effective use of AI in governance and public administration. Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance of investing in education, training, and capacity building to develop a skilled workforce, enabling countries to harness AI potential and improve government service efficiency.

Related papers

• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment. We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Democratizing AI Governance: Balancing Expertise and Public Participation [1.0878040851638]
  The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, with their profound societal impacts, raise critical challenges for governance.<n>This article explores the tension between expert-led oversight and democratic participation, analyzing models of participatory and deliberative democracy.<n> Recommendations are provided for integrating these approaches into a balanced governance model tailored to the European Union.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T17:47:33Z)
• AI Governance in the Context of the EU AI Act: A Bibliometric and Literature Review Approach [0.0]
  This study analyzed the research trends in AI governance within the framework of the EU AI Act.<n>Our findings reveal that research on AI governance, particularly concerning AI systems regulated by the EU AI Act, remains relatively limited compared to the broader AI research landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T11:01:11Z)
• Strategic AI Governance: Insights from Leading Nations [0.0]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize various sectors, yet its adoption is often hindered by concerns about data privacy, security, and the understanding of AI capabilities. This paper synthesizes AI governance approaches, strategic themes, and enablers and challenges for AI adoption by reviewing national AI strategies from leading nations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T06:00:42Z)
• Open Problems in Technical AI Governance [93.89102632003996]
  Technical AI governance refers to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI. This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T21:13:56Z)
• The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Measurement: Opportunities and Ethical Challenges [2.569083526579529]
  AI in education raises ethical concerns regarding validity, reliability, transparency, fairness, and equity. Various stakeholders, including educators, policymakers, and organizations, have developed guidelines to ensure ethical AI use in education. In this paper, a diverse group of AIME members examines the ethical implications of AI-powered tools in educational measurement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T05:28:40Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
  Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.