Rethinking RL Scaling for Vision Language Models: A Transparent, From-Scratch Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02587v2
• Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 01:07:06 GMT
• Title: Rethinking RL Scaling for Vision Language Models: A Transparent, From-Scratch Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme
• Authors: Yan Ma, Steffi Chern, Xuyang Shen, Yiran Zhong, Pengfei Liu,
• Abstract summary: This work introduces a transparent, from-scratch framework forReinforcement learning (RL) in vision-based models (VLMs)<n>It offers a minimal yet functional four-step pipeline validated across multiple models and datasets.<n>In addition, a standardized evaluation scheme is proposed to assess training dynamics and reflective behaviors.
• Score: 36.34443944082215
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently shown strong potential in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models and is now being actively extended to vision-language models (VLMs). However, existing RL applications in VLMs often rely on heavily engineered frameworks that hinder reproducibility and accessibility, while lacking standardized evaluation protocols, making it difficult to compare results or interpret training dynamics. This work introduces a transparent, from-scratch framework for RL in VLMs, offering a minimal yet functional four-step pipeline validated across multiple models and datasets. In addition, a standardized evaluation scheme is proposed to assess training dynamics and reflective behaviors. Extensive experiments on visual reasoning tasks uncover key empirical findings: response length is sensitive to random seeds, reflection correlates with output length, and RL consistently outperforms supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in generalization, even with high-quality data. These findings, together with the proposed framework, aim to establish a reproducible baseline and support broader engagement in RL-based VLM research.

Related papers

• Reinforced MLLM: A Survey on RL-Based Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [22.796496516709514]
  This survey systematically reviews recent advances in RL-based reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models. We highlight two main RL paradigms--value-free and value-based methods--and analyze how RL enhances reasoning abilities. We provide an extensive overview of benchmark datasets, evaluation protocols, and existing limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T03:14:28Z)
• VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Model [29.524164786422368]
  Recently, DeepSeek R1 has shown that reinforcement learning can substantially improve the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) We investigate the extension of R1-style reinforcement learning to Vision-Language Models (VLMs) We develop VLM-R1, a dedicated framework designed to harness RL for improving VLMs' performance on general vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T10:05:15Z)
• Exploring the Effect of Reinforcement Learning on Video Understanding: Insights from SEED-Bench-R1 [53.894789613838654]
  We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark designed to evaluate post-training methods for MLLMs in video understanding.<n>It includes intricate real-world videos and complex everyday planning tasks in the format of multiple-choice questions.<n>Using Qwen2-VL-Instruct-7B as a base model, we compare RL with supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>Our detailed analysis reveals that RL enhances visual perception but often produces less coherent reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:55:23Z)
• Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains [92.36624674516553]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated significant success in enhancing mathematical reasoning and coding performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>We investigate the effectiveness and scalability of RLVR across diverse real-world domains including medicine, chemistry, psychology, economics, and education.<n>We utilize a generative scoring technique that yields soft, model-based reward signals to overcome limitations posed by binary verifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T08:22:49Z)
• OpenVLThinker: An Early Exploration to Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative Self-Improvement [91.88062410741833]
  This study investigates whether similar reasoning capabilities can be successfully integrated into large vision-language models (LVLMs)<n>We consider an approach that iteratively leverages supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on lightweight training data and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to further improve model generalization.<n>OpenVLThinker, a LVLM exhibiting consistently improved reasoning performance on challenging benchmarks such as MathVista, MathVerse, and MathVision, demonstrates the potential of our strategy for robust vision-language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• Think or Not Think: A Study of Explicit Thinking inRule-Based Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuning [8.665713419757061]
  Rule-based reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning for visual classification using multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) and the role of the thinking process is investigated.<n>We introduce textitNo-Thinking-RL, a novel approach that minimizes the model's thinking during fine-tuning by utilizing an equality accuracy reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T14:37:45Z)
• GTR: Guided Thought Reinforcement Prevents Thought Collapse in RL-based VLM Agent Training [62.536191233049614]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable outcome rewards (RLVR) has effectively scaled up chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>This work investigates this problem through extensive experiments on complex card games, such as 24 points, and embodied tasks from ALFWorld.<n>We find that when rewards are based solely on action outcomes, RL fails to incentivize CoT reasoning in VLMs, instead leading to a phenomenon we termed thought collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T15:17:02Z)
• The Surprising Ineffectiveness of Pre-Trained Visual Representations for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [8.36595587335589]
  Visual Reinforcement Learning methods often require extensive amounts of data.<n>Model-based RL (MBRL) offers a potential solution with efficient data utilization through planning.<n>MBRL lacks generalization capabilities for real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T13:21:26Z)
• Test-Time Adaptation with CLIP Reward for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models [76.410400238974]
  We propose TTA with feedback to rectify the model output and prevent the model from becoming blindly confident. A CLIP model is adopted as the reward model during TTA and provides feedback for the VLM. The proposed textitreinforcement learning with CLIP feedback(RLCF) framework is highly flexible and universal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T11:03:59Z)
• Challenges and Opportunities in Offline Reinforcement Learning from Visual Observations [58.758928936316785]
  offline reinforcement learning from visual observations with continuous action spaces remains under-explored. We show that modifications to two popular vision-based online reinforcement learning algorithms suffice to outperform existing offline RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T22:08:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.