Systematic Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models for Surgical Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02799v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:42:56 GMT
• Title: Systematic Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models for Surgical Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Anita Rau, Mark Endo, Josiah Aklilu, Jaewoo Heo, Khaled Saab, Alberto Paderno, Jeffrey Jopling, F. Christopher Holsinger, Serena Yeung-Levy,
• Abstract summary: Large Vision-Language Models offer a new paradigm for AI-driven image understanding.<n>This flexibility holds particular promise across medicine, where expert-annotated data is scarce.<n>Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of 11 state-of-the-art VLMs across 17 key visual understanding tasks in surgical AI.
• Score: 1.1765603103920352
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models offer a new paradigm for AI-driven image understanding, enabling models to perform tasks without task-specific training. This flexibility holds particular promise across medicine, where expert-annotated data is scarce. Yet, VLMs' practical utility in intervention-focused domains--especially surgery, where decision-making is subjective and clinical scenarios are variable--remains uncertain. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of 11 state-of-the-art VLMs across 17 key visual understanding tasks in surgical AI--from anatomy recognition to skill assessment--using 13 datasets spanning laparoscopic, robotic, and open procedures. In our experiments, VLMs demonstrate promising generalizability, at times outperforming supervised models when deployed outside their training setting. In-context learning, incorporating examples during testing, boosted performance up to three-fold, suggesting adaptability as a key strength. Still, tasks requiring spatial or temporal reasoning remained difficult. Beyond surgery, our findings offer insights into VLMs' potential for tackling complex and dynamic scenarios in clinical and broader real-world applications.

Related papers

• Surgeons vs. Computer Vision: A comparative analysis on surgical phase recognition capabilities [65.66373425605278]
  Automated Surgical Phase Recognition (SPR) uses Artificial Intelligence (AI) to segment the surgical workflow into its key events. Previous research has focused on short and linear surgical procedures and has not explored if temporal context influences experts' ability to better classify surgical phases. This research addresses these gaps, focusing on Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) as a highly non-linear procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-26T15:37:22Z)
• Can DeepSeek Reason Like a Surgeon? An Empirical Evaluation for Vision-Language Understanding in Robotic-Assisted Surgery [17.728772280544444]
  DeepSeek series have demonstrated outstanding performance in general scene understanding, question-answering (QA), and text generation tasks.<n>This study focuses on tasks such as Single Phrase QA, Visual QA, and Detailed Description.<n>DeepSeek-V3 exhibits significant limitations in spatial position analysis and struggles to understand surgical actions accurately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T15:48:46Z)
• SurgRAW: Multi-Agent Workflow with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Surgical Intelligence [16.584722724845182]
  Integration of Vision-Language Models in surgical intelligence is hindered by hallucinations, domain knowledge gaps, and limited understanding of task interdependencies.<n>We present SurgRAW, a CoT-driven multi-agent framework that delivers transparent, interpretable insights for most tasks in robotic-assisted surgery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T11:23:13Z)
• SurgicalVLM-Agent: Towards an Interactive AI Co-Pilot for Pituitary Surgery [15.263720052126853]
  Large vision-language models (VLMs) offer a promising solution by enabling dynamic task planning and predictive decision support. We introduce SurgicalVLM-Agent, an AI co-pilot for image-guided pituitary surgery, capable of conversation, planning, and task execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T15:30:39Z)
• Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice through Interactive Sequential Benchmarking [58.25862290294702]
  We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow. We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z)
• Procedure-Aware Surgical Video-language Pretraining with Hierarchical Knowledge Augmentation [51.222684687924215]
  Surgical video-language pretraining faces unique challenges due to the knowledge domain gap and the scarcity of multi-modal data.<n>We propose a hierarchical knowledge augmentation approach and a novel Procedure-Encoded Surgical Knowledge-Augmented Video-Language Pretraining framework to tackle these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T22:21:05Z)
• Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
  Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions. VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information. We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z)
• Surgical-LVLM: Learning to Adapt Large Vision-Language Model for Grounded Visual Question Answering in Robotic Surgery [15.47190687192761]
  We introduce Surgical-LVLM, a novel personalized large vision-language model tailored for complex surgical scenarios.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of Surgical-LVLM on several benchmarks, including EndoVis-17-VQLA, EndoVis-18-VQLA, and a newly introduced EndoVis Conversations dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T08:38:27Z)
• Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Models [78.69439393646554]
  This paper endeavors to evaluate the competency of popular large vision-language models (LVLMs) in specialized and general tasks. We employ six challenging tasks in three different application scenarios: natural, healthcare, and industrial. We examine the performance of three recent open-source LVLMs, including MiniGPT-v2, LLaVA-1.5, and Shikra, on both visual recognition and localization in these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T08:25:27Z)
• More Than Meets the Eye: Analyzing Anesthesiologists' Visual Attention in the Operating Room Using Deep Learning Models [0.0]
  Currently, most studies employ wearable eye-tracking technologies to analyze anesthesiologists' visual patterns. By utilizing a novel eye-tracking method in the form of deep learning models that process monitor-mounted webcams, we collected continuous behavioral data. We distinguished between baseline VA distribution during uneventful periods to patterns associated with active phases or during critical, unanticipated incidents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T11:12:04Z)
• Dissecting Self-Supervised Learning Methods for Surgical Computer Vision [51.370873913181605]
  Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) methods have begun to gain traction in the general computer vision community. The effectiveness of SSL methods in more complex and impactful domains, such as medicine and surgery, remains limited and unexplored. We present an extensive analysis of the performance of these methods on the Cholec80 dataset for two fundamental and popular tasks in surgical context understanding, phase recognition and tool presence detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T14:17:11Z)
• Robust and Efficient Medical Imaging with Self-Supervision [80.62711706785834]
  We present REMEDIS, a unified representation learning strategy to improve robustness and data-efficiency of medical imaging AI. We study a diverse range of medical imaging tasks and simulate three realistic application scenarios using retrospective data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T17:34:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.