Fairness in Machine Learning-based Hand Load Estimation: A Case Study on Load Carriage Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05610v1
• Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 01:55:40 GMT
• Title: Fairness in Machine Learning-based Hand Load Estimation: A Case Study on Load Carriage Tasks
• Authors: Arafat Rahman, Sol Lim, Seokhyun Chung,
• Abstract summary: We developed and evaluated a fair predictive model for hand load estimation that leverages a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) with feature disentanglement.<n>Our proposed fair algorithm outperformed conventional machine learning methods in both fairness and predictive accuracy, achieving a lower mean absolute error (MAE) difference across male and female sets.<n>These findings emphasize the importance of fairness-aware machine learning algorithms to prevent potential disadvantages in workplace health and safety for certain worker populations.
• Score: 1.1674893622721483
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Predicting external hand load from sensor data is essential for ergonomic exposure assessments, as obtaining this information typically requires direct observation or supplementary data. While machine learning methods have been used to estimate external hand load from worker postures or force exertion data, our findings reveal systematic bias in these predictions due to individual differences such as age and biological sex. To explore this issue, we examined bias in hand load prediction by varying the sex ratio in the training dataset. We found substantial sex disparity in predictive performance, especially when the training dataset is more sex-imbalanced. To address this bias, we developed and evaluated a fair predictive model for hand load estimation that leverages a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) with feature disentanglement. This approach is designed to separate sex-agnostic and sex-specific latent features, minimizing feature overlap. The disentanglement capability enables the model to make predictions based solely on sex-agnostic features of motion patterns, ensuring fair prediction for both biological sexes. Our proposed fair algorithm outperformed conventional machine learning methods (e.g., Random Forests) in both fairness and predictive accuracy, achieving a lower mean absolute error (MAE) difference across male and female sets and improved fairness metrics such as statistical parity (SP) and positive and negative residual differences (PRD and NRD), even when trained on imbalanced sex datasets. These findings emphasize the importance of fairness-aware machine learning algorithms to prevent potential disadvantages in workplace health and safety for certain worker populations.

Related papers

• Exploring Gender Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition Technology [22.729651340592586]
  We analyze how performance varies across different gender representations in training data. Our findings suggest a complex interplay between the gender ratio in training data and ASR performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T18:29:38Z)
• How far can bias go? -- Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignment [54.51310112013655]
  This study examines the correlation between gender-occupation bias in pre-training data and their manifestation in LLMs.<n>Our findings reveal that biases present in pre-training data are amplified in model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T16:20:25Z)
• Fair Generalized Linear Mixed Models [0.0]
  Fairness in machine learning aims to ensure that biases in the data and model inaccuracies do not lead to discriminatory decisions.<n>We present an algorithm that can handle both problems simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T11:42:41Z)
• Evaluating Bias and Fairness in Gender-Neutral Pretrained Vision-and-Language Models [23.65626682262062]
  We quantify bias amplification in pretraining and after fine-tuning on three families of vision-and-language models. Overall, we find that bias amplification in pretraining and after fine-tuning are independent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T16:19:19Z)
• Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data [62.43249746968616]
  Fairness-aware machine learning aims to eliminate biases of learning models against certain subgroups described by certain protected (sensitive) attributes such as race, gender, and age. A prerequisite for existing methods to achieve counterfactual fairness is the prior human knowledge of the causal model for the data. In this work, we address the problem of counterfactually fair prediction from observational data without given causal models by proposing a novel framework CLAIRE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T04:08:29Z)
• Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for Fairness [15.210232622716129]
  Data-driven predictive solutions predominant in commercial applications tend to suffer from biases and stereotypes. Data augmentation reduces gender bias by adding counterfactual examples to the training dataset. We show that some of the examples in the augmented dataset can be not important or even harmful for fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-20T22:42:30Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Improving Gender Fairness of Pre-Trained Language Models without Catastrophic Forgetting [88.83117372793737]
  Forgetting information in the original training data may damage the model's downstream performance by a large margin. We propose GEnder Equality Prompt (GEEP) to improve gender fairness of pre-trained models with less forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T15:52:16Z)
• Balancing Biases and Preserving Privacy on Balanced Faces in the Wild [50.915684171879036]
  There are demographic biases present in current facial recognition (FR) models. We introduce our Balanced Faces in the Wild dataset to measure these biases across different ethnic and gender subgroups. We find that relying on a single score threshold to differentiate between genuine and imposters sample pairs leads to suboptimal results. We propose a novel domain adaptation learning scheme that uses facial features extracted from state-of-the-art neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T15:05:49Z)
• Unfairness Discovery and Prevention For Few-Shot Regression [9.95899391250129]
  We study fairness in supervised few-shot meta-learning models sensitive to discrimination (or bias) in historical data. A machine learning model trained based on biased data tends to make unfair predictions for users from minority groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-23T22:34:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.