Automatically Generating Single-Responsibility Unit Tests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06431v2
• Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:12:31 GMT
• Title: Automatically Generating Single-Responsibility Unit Tests
• Authors: Geraldine Galindo-Gutierrez,
• Abstract summary: I aim to investigate the effects of providing a pre-process structure to the generated tests.<n>We propose to implement different test representations for evolution and evaluate their impact on coverage, fault detection, and understandability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Automatic test generation aims to save developers time and effort by producing test suites with reasonably high coverage and fault detection. However, the focus of search-based generation tools in maximizing coverage leaves other properties, such as test quality, coincidental. The evidence shows that developers remain skeptical of using generated tests as they face understandability challenges. Generated tests do not follow a defined structure while evolving, which can result in tests that contain method calls to improve coverage but lack a clear relation to the generated assertions. In my doctoral research, I aim to investigate the effects of providing a pre-process structure to the generated tests, based on the single-responsibility principle to favor the identification of the focal method under test. To achieve this, we propose to implement different test representations for evolution and evaluate their impact on coverage, fault detection, and understandability. We hypothesize that improving the structure of generated tests will report positive effects on the tests' understandability without significantly affecting the effectiveness. We aim to conduct a quantitative analysis of this proposed approach as well as a developer evaluation of the understandability of these tests.

Related papers

• Do Test and Environmental Complexity Increase Flakiness? An Empirical Study of SAP HANA [47.29324864511411]
  Flaky tests fail seemingly at random without changes to the code. We study characteristics of tests and the test environment that potentially impact test flakiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T07:52:09Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhancing the Understandability of Generated Unit Tests [4.574205608859157]
  We introduce UTGen, which combines search-based software testing and large language models to enhance the understandability of automatically generated test cases. We observe that participants working on assignments with UTGen test cases fix up to 33% more bugs and use up to 20% less time when compared to baseline test cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T15:35:34Z)
• TestART: Improving LLM-based Unit Testing via Co-evolution of Automated Generation and Repair Iteration [7.509927117191286]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating unit test cases.<n>We propose TestART, a novel unit test generation method.<n>TestART improves LLM-based unit testing via co-evolution of automated generation and repair iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T10:52:41Z)
• Observation-based unit test generation at Meta [52.4716552057909]
  TestGen automatically generates unit tests, carved from serialized observations of complex objects, observed during app execution. TestGen has landed 518 tests into production, which have been executed 9,617,349 times in continuous integration, finding 5,702 faults. Our evaluation reveals that, when carving its observations from 4,361 reliable end-to-end tests, TestGen was able to generate tests for at least 86% of the classes covered by end-to-end tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T00:34:39Z)
• Towards a Complete Metamorphic Testing Pipeline [56.75969180129005]
  Metamorphic Testing (MT) addresses the test oracle problem by examining the relationships between input-output pairs in consecutive executions of the System Under Test (SUT) These relations, known as Metamorphic Relations (MRs), specify the expected output changes resulting from specific input changes. Our research aims to develop methods and tools that assist testers in generating MRs, defining constraints, and providing explainability for MR outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T10:49:22Z)
• Effective Test Generation Using Pre-trained Large Language Models and Mutation Testing [13.743062498008555]
  We introduce MuTAP for improving the effectiveness of test cases generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) in terms of revealing bugs. MuTAP is capable of generating effective test cases in the absence of natural language descriptions of the Program Under Test (PUTs) Our results show that our proposed method is able to detect up to 28% more faulty human-written code snippets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T08:48:31Z)
• Towards Automatic Generation of Amplified Regression Test Oracles [44.45138073080198]
  We propose a test oracle derivation approach to amplify regression test oracles. The approach monitors the object state during test execution and compares it to the previous version to detect any changes in relation to the SUT's intended behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T12:38:44Z)
• From Static Benchmarks to Adaptive Testing: Psychometrics in AI Evaluation [60.14902811624433]
  We discuss a paradigm shift from static evaluation methods to adaptive testing. This involves estimating the characteristics and value of each test item in the benchmark and dynamically adjusting items in real-time. We analyze the current approaches, advantages, and underlying reasons for adopting psychometrics in AI evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z)
• Hybrid Intelligent Testing in Simulation-Based Verification [0.0]
  Several millions of tests may be required to achieve coverage goals. Coverage-Directed Test Selection learns from coverage feedback to bias testing towards the most effective tests. Novelty-Driven Verification learns to identify and simulate stimuli that differ from previous stimuli.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T13:22:08Z)
• Catch Me if I Can: Detecting Strategic Behaviour in Peer Assessment [61.24399136715106]
  We consider the issue of strategic behaviour in various peer-assessment tasks, including peer grading of exams or homeworks and peer review in hiring or promotions. Our focus is on designing methods for detection of such manipulations. Specifically, we consider a setting in which agents evaluate a subset of their peers and output rankings that are later aggregated to form a final ordering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T15:08:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.