A Meaningful Perturbation Metric for Evaluating Explainability Methods

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06800v1
• Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 11:46:41 GMT
• Title: A Meaningful Perturbation Metric for Evaluating Explainability Methods
• Authors: Danielle Cohen, Hila Chefer, Lior Wolf,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel approach, which harnesses image generation models to perform targeted perturbation.<n> Specifically, we focus on inpainting only the high-relevance pixels of an input image to modify the model's predictions while preserving image fidelity.<n>This is in contrast to existing approaches, which often produce out-of-distribution modifications, leading to unreliable results.
• Score: 55.09730499143998
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have demonstrated remarkable success, yet their wide adoption is often hindered by their opaque decision-making. To address this, attribution methods have been proposed to assign relevance values to each part of the input. However, different methods often produce entirely different relevance maps, necessitating the development of standardized metrics to evaluate them. Typically, such evaluation is performed through perturbation, wherein high- or low-relevance regions of the input image are manipulated to examine the change in prediction. In this work, we introduce a novel approach, which harnesses image generation models to perform targeted perturbation. Specifically, we focus on inpainting only the high-relevance pixels of an input image to modify the model's predictions while preserving image fidelity. This is in contrast to existing approaches, which often produce out-of-distribution modifications, leading to unreliable results. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in generating meaningful rankings across a wide range of models and attribution methods. Crucially, we establish that the ranking produced by our metric exhibits significantly higher correlation with human preferences compared to existing approaches, underscoring its potential for enhancing interpretability in DNNs.

Related papers

• PaRCE: Probabilistic and Reconstruction-based Competency Estimation for CNN-based Image Classification [0.10923877073891446]
  We develop a probabilistic and reconstruction-based competency estimation (PaRCE) method.<n>We find that our method can best distinguish between correctly classified, misclassified, and OOD samples with anomalous regions.<n>Our method generates interpretable scores that most reliably capture a holistic notion of perception model confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T22:08:57Z)
• Utilizing Adversarial Examples for Bias Mitigation and Accuracy Enhancement [3.0820287240219795]
  We propose a novel approach to mitigate biases in computer vision models by utilizing counterfactual generation and fine-tuning. Our approach leverages a curriculum learning framework combined with a fine-grained adversarial loss to fine-tune the model using adversarial examples. We validate our approach through both qualitative and quantitative assessments, demonstrating improved bias mitigation and accuracy compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T00:41:32Z)
• On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical Image Segmentation [47.95611203419802]
  Foundations for vision and language, pre-trained on extensive sets of natural image and text data, have emerged as a promising approach. We compare the generalization performance to unseen domains of various pre-trained models after being fine-tuned on the same in-distribution dataset. We further developed a new Bayesian uncertainty estimation for frozen models and used them as an indicator to characterize the model's performance on out-of-distribution data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:52:10Z)
• Better Understanding Differences in Attribution Methods via Systematic Evaluations [57.35035463793008]
  Post-hoc attribution methods have been proposed to identify image regions most influential to the models' decisions. We propose three novel evaluation schemes to more reliably measure the faithfulness of those methods. We use these evaluation schemes to study strengths and shortcomings of some widely used attribution methods over a wide range of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T14:24:58Z)
• Uncertainty Inspired Underwater Image Enhancement [45.05141499761876]
  We present a novel probabilistic network to learn the enhancement distribution of degraded underwater images. By learning the enhancement distribution, our method can cope with the bias introduced in the reference map labeling. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach enables sampling possible enhancement predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T06:42:28Z)
• Towards Better Understanding Attribution Methods [77.1487219861185]
  Post-hoc attribution methods have been proposed to identify image regions most influential to the models' decisions. We propose three novel evaluation schemes to more reliably measure the faithfulness of those methods. We also propose a post-processing smoothing step that significantly improves the performance of some attribution methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T20:50:17Z)
• Bayesian Graph Contrastive Learning [55.36652660268726]
  We propose a novel perspective of graph contrastive learning methods showing random augmentations leads to encoders. Our proposed method represents each node by a distribution in the latent space in contrast to existing techniques which embed each node to a deterministic vector. We show a considerable improvement in performance compared to existing state-of-the-art methods on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T01:45:32Z)
• Deblurring via Stochastic Refinement [85.42730934561101]
  We present an alternative framework for blind deblurring based on conditional diffusion models. Our method is competitive in terms of distortion metrics such as PSNR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T04:36:09Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Assessing the Reliability of Visual Explanations of Deep Models with Adversarial Perturbations [15.067369314723958]
  We propose an objective measure to evaluate the reliability of explanations of deep models. Our approach is based on changes in the network's outcome resulting from the perturbation of input images in an adversarial way. We also propose a straightforward application of our approach to clean relevance maps, creating more interpretable maps without any loss in essential explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T19:57:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.