Fusing Reward and Dueling Feedback in Stochastic Bandits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15812v1
• Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:51:20 GMT
• Title: Fusing Reward and Dueling Feedback in Stochastic Bandits
• Authors: Xuchuang Wang, Qirun Zeng, Jinhang Zuo, Xutong Liu, Mohammad Hajiesmaili, John C. S. Lui, Adam Wierman,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the fusion of absolute (reward) and relative (dueling) feedback in bandits, where both feedback types are gathered in each decision round.<n>We derive a regret lower bound, demonstrating that an efficient algorithm may incur only the smaller among the reward and dueling-based regret for each individual arm.
• Score: 37.151617544329895
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the fusion of absolute (reward) and relative (dueling) feedback in stochastic bandits, where both feedback types are gathered in each decision round. We derive a regret lower bound, demonstrating that an efficient algorithm may incur only the smaller among the reward and dueling-based regret for each individual arm. We propose two fusion approaches: (1) a simple elimination fusion algorithm that leverages both feedback types to explore all arms and unifies collected information by sharing a common candidate arm set, and (2) a decomposition fusion algorithm that selects the more effective feedback to explore the corresponding arms and randomly assigns one feedback type for exploration and the other for exploitation in each round. The elimination fusion experiences a suboptimal multiplicative term of the number of arms in regret due to the intrinsic suboptimality of dueling elimination. In contrast, the decomposition fusion achieves regret matching the lower bound up to a constant under a common assumption. Extensive experiments confirm the efficacy of our algorithms and theoretical results.

Related papers

• Best Arm Identification with Minimal Regret [55.831935724659175]
  Best arm identification problem elegantly amalgamates regret minimization and BAI. Agent's goal is to identify the best arm with a prescribed confidence level. Double KL-UCB algorithm achieves optimality as the confidence level tends to zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:46:02Z)
• Neural Dueling Bandits: Preference-Based Optimization with Human Feedback [58.90189511247936]
  We use a neural network to estimate the reward function using preference feedback for the previously selected arms.<n>We also extend our theoretical results to contextual bandit problems with binary feedback, which is in itself a non-trivial contribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T09:23:22Z)
• Multi-Armed Bandits with Abstention [62.749500564313834]
  We introduce a novel extension of the canonical multi-armed bandit problem that incorporates an additional strategic element: abstention. In this enhanced framework, the agent is not only tasked with selecting an arm at each time step, but also has the option to abstain from accepting the instantaneous reward before observing it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T06:27:12Z)
• Dueling Bandits: From Two-dueling to Multi-dueling [40.4378338001229]
  We study a general multi-dueling bandit problem, where an agent compares multiple options simultaneously and aims to minimize the regret due to selecting suboptimal arms. This setting generalizes the traditional two-dueling bandit problem and finds many real-world applications involving subjective feedback on multiple options.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T22:00:54Z)
• Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Bandits [15.456561090871244]
  This paper introduces a general multi-agent bandit model in which each agent is facing a finite set of arms. The twist is that the optimal arm for each agent is the arm with largest expected mixed reward, where the mixed reward of an arm is a weighted sum of the rewards of this arm for all agents. We propose a near-optimal algorithm for pure exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T21:11:47Z)
• Versatile Dueling Bandits: Best-of-both-World Analyses for Online Learning from Preferences [28.79598714109439]
  We study the problem of $K$-armed dueling bandit for both and adversarial environments. We first propose a novel reduction from any (general) dueling bandits to multi-armed bandits. Our algorithm is also the first to achieve an optimal $O(sum_i = 1K fraclog TDelta_i)$ regret bound against the Condorcet-winner benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T13:37:23Z)
• Bias-Robust Bayesian Optimization via Dueling Bandit [57.82422045437126]
  We consider Bayesian optimization in settings where observations can be adversarially biased. We propose a novel approach for dueling bandits based on information-directed sampling (IDS) Thereby, we obtain the first efficient kernelized algorithm for dueling bandits that comes with cumulative regret guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T10:08:41Z)
• Efficient Pure Exploration for Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-Bandit Feedback [51.21673420940346]
  Combinatorial bandits generalize multi-armed bandits, where the agent chooses sets of arms and observes a noisy reward for each arm contained in the chosen set. We focus on the pure-exploration problem of identifying the best arm with fixed confidence, as well as a more general setting, where the structure of the answer set differs from the one of the action set. Based on a projection-free online learning algorithm for finite polytopes, it is the first computationally efficient algorithm which is convexally optimal and has competitive empirical performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T10:35:09Z)
• Adaptive Algorithms for Multi-armed Bandit with Composite and Anonymous Feedback [32.62857394584907]
  We study the multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem with composite and anonymous feedback. We propose adaptive algorithms for both the adversarial and non- adversarial cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-13T12:25:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.