Intrinsic Barriers to Explaining Deep Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16948v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 21:19:23 GMT
• Title: Intrinsic Barriers to Explaining Deep Foundation Models
• Authors: Zhen Tan, Huan Liu,
• Abstract summary: Deep Foundation Models (DFMs) offer unprecedented capabilities but their increasing complexity presents profound challenges to understanding their internal workings.<n>This paper delves into this critical question by examining the fundamental characteristics of DFMs and scrutinizing the limitations encountered by current explainability methods.
• Score: 17.952353851860742
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep Foundation Models (DFMs) offer unprecedented capabilities but their increasing complexity presents profound challenges to understanding their internal workings-a critical need for ensuring trust, safety, and accountability. As we grapple with explaining these systems, a fundamental question emerges: Are the difficulties we face merely temporary hurdles, awaiting more sophisticated analytical techniques, or do they stem from \emph{intrinsic barriers} deeply rooted in the nature of these large-scale models themselves? This paper delves into this critical question by examining the fundamental characteristics of DFMs and scrutinizing the limitations encountered by current explainability methods when confronted with this inherent challenge. We probe the feasibility of achieving satisfactory explanations and consider the implications for how we must approach the verification and governance of these powerful technologies.

Related papers

• Causality-Driven Neural Network Repair: Challenges and Opportunities [5.69361786082969]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) often rely on statistical correlations rather than causal reasoning, limiting their robustness and interpretability. This paper explores causal inference as an approach primarily for DNN repair, leveraging causal debug, and structural causal models (SCMs) to identify and correct failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T21:22:00Z)
• All You Need for Counterfactual Explainability Is Principled and Reliable Estimate of Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty [27.344785490275864]
  We argue that transparency research overlooks many foundational concepts of artificial intelligence.<n>Inherently transparent models can benefit from human-centred explanatory insights.<n>At a higher level, integrating artificial intelligence fundamentals into transparency research promises to yield more reliable, robust and understandable predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T09:38:31Z)
• Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability [61.44773053835185]
  Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities.<n>Despite recent progress toward these goals, there are many open problems in the field that require solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:57:18Z)
• A Theoretical Survey on Foundation Models [48.2313835471321]
  This survey aims to review those interpretable methods that comply with the aforementioned principles and have been successfully applied to black-box foundation models. The methods are deeply rooted in machine learning theory, covering the analysis of generalization performance, expressive capability, and dynamic behavior. They provide a thorough interpretation of the entire workflow of FMs, ranging from the inference capability and training dynamics to their ethical implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T09:48:03Z)
• FFAA: Multimodal Large Language Model based Explainable Open-World Face Forgery Analysis Assistant [59.2438504610849]
  We introduce FFAA: Face Forgery Analysis Assistant, consisting of a fine-tuned Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) and Multi-answer Intelligent Decision System (MIDS) Our method not only provides user-friendly and explainable results but also significantly boosts accuracy and robustness compared to previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T15:15:20Z)
• Learning Structural Causal Models through Deep Generative Models: Methods, Guarantees, and Challenges [42.0626213927983]
  It analyzes the hypotheses, guarantees, and applications inherent to the underlying deep learning components and structural causal models. It highlights the challenges and open questions in the field of deep structural causal modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T12:56:33Z)
• On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI [157.96723998647363]
  We argue that current large-scale generative AI models exhibit several fundamental shortcomings that hinder their widespread adoption across domains.<n>We aim to provide researchers with insights for exploring fruitful research directions, thus fostering the development of more robust and accessible generative AI solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T15:19:33Z)
• On Catastrophic Inheritance of Large Foundation Models [51.41727422011327]
  Large foundation models (LFMs) are claiming incredible performances. Yet great concerns have been raised about their mythic and uninterpreted potentials. We propose to identify a neglected issue deeply rooted in LFMs: Catastrophic Inheritance. We discuss the challenges behind this issue and propose UIM, a framework to understand the catastrophic inheritance of LFMs from both pre-training and downstream adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T21:21:55Z)
• Towards CausalGPT: A Multi-Agent Approach for Faithful Knowledge Reasoning via Promoting Causal Consistency in LLMs [55.66353783572259]
  Causal-Consistency Chain-of-Thought harnesses multi-agent collaboration to bolster the faithfulness and causality of foundation models. Our framework demonstrates significant superiority over state-of-the-art methods through extensive and comprehensive evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T04:59:21Z)
• Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning: State of the Art and Challenges [1.005130974691351]
  Interpretability, explainability and transparency are key issues to introducing Artificial Intelligence methods in many critical domains. This article provides a review of state of the art methods for explainable deep reinforcement learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-24T11:41:25Z)
• Towards a Responsible AI Development Lifecycle: Lessons From Information Security [0.0]
  We propose a framework for responsibly developing artificial intelligence systems. In particular, we propose leveraging the concepts of threat modeling, design review, penetration testing, and incident response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T13:03:58Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.