Redefining Superalignment: From Weak-to-Strong Alignment to Human-AI Co-Alignment to Sustainable Symbiotic Society

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17404v2
• Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:32:41 GMT
• Title: Redefining Superalignment: From Weak-to-Strong Alignment to Human-AI Co-Alignment to Sustainable Symbiotic Society
• Authors: Yi Zeng, Feifei Zhao, Yuwei Wang, Enmeng Lu, Yaodong Yang, Lei Wang, Chao Liu, Yitao Liang, Dongcheng Zhao, Bing Han, Haibo Tong, Yao Liang, Dongqi Liang, Kang Sun, Boyuan Chen, Jinyu Fan,
• Abstract summary: Superalignment ensures that AI systems much smarter than humans, remain aligned with human (compatible) intentions and values.<n>Existing scalable oversight and weak-to-strong generalization methods may prove substantially infeasible and inadequate when facing ASI.<n>We highlight a framework that integrates external oversight and intrinsic proactive alignment.
• Score: 22.005069513324777
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are becoming increasingly powerful and autonomous, and may progress to surpass human intelligence levels, namely Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). During the progression from AI to ASI, it may exceed human control, violate human values, and even lead to irreversible catastrophic consequences in extreme cases. This gives rise to a pressing issue that needs to be addressed: superalignment, ensuring that AI systems much smarter than humans, remain aligned with human (compatible) intentions and values. Existing scalable oversight and weak-to-strong generalization methods may prove substantially infeasible and inadequate when facing ASI. We must explore safer and more pluralistic frameworks and approaches for superalignment. In this paper, we redefine superalignment as the human-AI co-alignment towards a sustainable symbiotic society, and highlight a framework that integrates external oversight and intrinsic proactive alignment. External oversight superalignment should be grounded in human-centered ultimate decision, supplemented by interpretable automated evaluation and correction, to achieve continuous alignment with humanity's evolving values. Intrinsic proactive superalignment is rooted in a profound understanding of the Self, others, and society, integrating self-awareness, self-reflection, and empathy to spontaneously infer human intentions, distinguishing good from evil and proactively considering human well-being, ultimately attaining human-AI co-alignment through iterative interaction. The integration of externally-driven oversight with intrinsically-driven proactive alignment empowers sustainable symbiotic societies through human-AI co-alignment, paving the way for achieving safe and beneficial AGI and ASI for good, for human, and for a symbiotic ecology.

Related papers

• Research on Superalignment Should Advance Now with Parallel Optimization of Competence and Conformity [30.24208064228573]
  We argue that superalignment is achievable and research on it should advance immediately.<n>This work sheds light on a practical approach for developing the value-aligned next-generation AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T04:10:11Z)
• Why human-AI relationships need socioaffective alignment [16.283971225367537]
  Humans strive to design safe AI systems that align with our goals and remain under our control. As AI capabilities advance, we face a new challenge: the emergence of deeper, more persistent relationships between humans and AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:50:08Z)
• The Road to Artificial SuperIntelligence: A Comprehensive Survey of Superalignment [33.27140396561271]
  The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has sparked the possibility of about Artificial Superintelligence (ASI)<n>Superalignment aims to address two primary goals -- scalability in supervision to provide high-quality guidance signals and robust governance to ensure alignment with human values.<n>Specifically, we explore the concept of ASI, the challenges it poses, and the limitations of current alignment paradigms in addressing the superalignment problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T03:51:04Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  Recent advances in AI have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and decision support but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals. The responsible use of AI increasingly shows the need for human-AI teaming. A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom. While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems. We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
  Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment. We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safety [6.100304850888953]
  We argue that meaningful safety assurances for advanced AI technologies require reasoning about how the feedback loop formed by AI outputs and human behavior may drive the interaction towards different outcomes. We propose a concrete technical roadmap towards next-generation human-centered AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:52:00Z)
• AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey [69.61425542486275]
  AI alignment aims to make AI systems behave in line with human intentions and values.<n>We identify four principles as the key objectives of AI alignment: Robustness, Interpretability, Controllability, and Ethicality.<n>We decompose current alignment research into two key components: forward alignment and backward alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T15:52:15Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Reflective Hybrid Intelligence for Meaningful Human Control in Decision-Support Systems [4.1454448964078585]
  We introduce the notion of self-reflective AI systems for meaningful human control over AI systems. We propose a framework that integrates knowledge from psychology and philosophy with formal reasoning methods and machine learning approaches. We argue that self-reflective AI systems can lead to self-reflective hybrid systems (human + AI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T13:32:24Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.