Representation Learning for Distributional Perturbation Extrapolation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18522v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:44:04 GMT
• Title: Representation Learning for Distributional Perturbation Extrapolation
• Authors: Julius von Kügelgen, Jakob Ketterer, Xinwei Shen, Nicolai Meinshausen, Jonas Peters,
• Abstract summary: We consider the problem of modelling the effects of unseen perturbations on low-level measurements such as RNA sequencing data.<n>We propose a new method, the perturbation distribution autoencoder (PDAE), which is trained by maximising the distributional similarity between true and predicted perturbation distributions.
• Score: 14.951777123174082
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider the problem of modelling the effects of unseen perturbations such as gene knockdowns or drug combinations on low-level measurements such as RNA sequencing data. Specifically, given data collected under some perturbations, we aim to predict the distribution of measurements for new perturbations. To address this challenging extrapolation task, we posit that perturbations act additively in a suitable, unknown embedding space. More precisely, we formulate the generative process underlying the observed data as a latent variable model, in which perturbations amount to mean shifts in latent space and can be combined additively. Unlike previous work, we prove that, given sufficiently diverse training perturbations, the representation and perturbation effects are identifiable up to affine transformation, and use this to characterize the class of unseen perturbations for which we obtain extrapolation guarantees. To estimate the model from data, we propose a new method, the perturbation distribution autoencoder (PDAE), which is trained by maximising the distributional similarity between true and predicted perturbation distributions. The trained model can then be used to predict previously unseen perturbation distributions. Empirical evidence suggests that PDAE compares favourably to existing methods and baselines at predicting the effects of unseen perturbations.

Related papers

• Generative Intervention Models for Causal Perturbation Modeling [80.72074987374141]
  In many applications, it is a priori unknown which mechanisms of a system are modified by an external perturbation. We propose a generative intervention model (GIM) that learns to map these perturbation features to distributions over atomic interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T10:37:57Z)
• Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Models [52.92223039302037]
  Diffusion models have led to significant advancements in generative modelling.<n>Yet their widespread adoption poses challenges regarding data attribution and interpretability.<n>We develop an influence functions framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:02Z)
• Assumption-Lean Post-Integrated Inference with Negative Control Outcomes [0.0]
  We introduce a robust post-integrated inference (PII) method that adjusts for latent heterogeneity using negative control outcomes. Our method extends to projected direct effect estimands, accounting for hidden mediators, confounders, and moderators. The proposed doubly robust estimators are consistent and efficient under minimal assumptions and potential misspecification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T12:52:38Z)
• Constrained Diffusion Models via Dual Training [80.03953599062365]
  Diffusion processes are prone to generating samples that reflect biases in a training dataset. We develop constrained diffusion models by imposing diffusion constraints based on desired distributions. We show that our constrained diffusion models generate new data from a mixture data distribution that achieves the optimal trade-off among objective and constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T14:25:42Z)
• Inflationary Flows: Calibrated Bayesian Inference with Diffusion-Based Models [0.0]
  We show how diffusion-based models can be repurposed for performing principled, identifiable Bayesian inference.<n>We show how such maps can be learned via standard DBM training using a novel noise schedule.<n>The result is a class of highly expressive generative models, uniquely defined on a low-dimensional latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T19:58:19Z)
• Supervised Contrastive Learning with Heterogeneous Similarity for Distribution Shifts [3.7819322027528113]
  We propose a new regularization using the supervised contrastive learning to prevent such overfitting and to train models that do not degrade their performance under the distribution shifts. Experiments on benchmark datasets that emulate distribution shifts, including subpopulation shift and domain generalization, demonstrate the advantage of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T01:45:09Z)
• Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correction [0.4588028371034407]
  A neural network is trained to approximate the posterior distribution over existing pairs of model and data. The accuracy of this approach relies on the availability of high-fidelity training data. We show that our correction step improves the robustness of amortized variational inference with respect to changes in number of source experiments, noise variance, and shifts in the prior distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T02:38:54Z)
• Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributions [90.68414180153897]
  We connect domain adaptation and predictive uncertainty literature to predict model accuracy on challenging unseen distributions. We find that the difference of confidences (DoC) of a classifier's predictions successfully estimates the classifier's performance change over a variety of shifts. We specifically investigate the distinction between synthetic and natural distribution shifts and observe that despite its simplicity DoC consistently outperforms other quantifications of distributional difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:50:18Z)
• Which Invariance Should We Transfer? A Causal Minimax Learning Approach [18.71316951734806]
  We present a comprehensive minimax analysis from a causal perspective. We propose an efficient algorithm to search for the subset with minimal worst-case risk. The effectiveness and efficiency of our methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T09:07:29Z)
• The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
  The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z)
• Robust Correction of Sampling Bias Using Cumulative Distribution Functions [19.551668880584973]
  Varying domains and biased datasets can lead to differences between the training and the target distributions. Current approaches for alleviating this often rely on estimating the ratio of training and target probability density functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T22:13:00Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.