Meta-Learning in Self-Play Regret Minimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18917v1
• Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 13:27:24 GMT
• Title: Meta-Learning in Self-Play Regret Minimization
• Authors: David Sychrovský, Martin Schmid, Michal Šustr, Michael Bowling,
• Abstract summary: We present a general approach to online optimization which plays a crucial role in many algorithms for approximating Nash equilibria in two-player zero-sum games.<n>We build upon this, extending the framework to the more challenging self-play setting, which is the basis for most state-of-the-art equilibrium approximation algorithms.<n>Our meta-learned algorithms considerably outperform other state-of-the-art regret minimization algorithms.
• Score: 10.843705580746397
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Regret minimization is a general approach to online optimization which plays a crucial role in many algorithms for approximating Nash equilibria in two-player zero-sum games. The literature mainly focuses on solving individual games in isolation. However, in practice, players often encounter a distribution of similar but distinct games. For example, when trading correlated assets on the stock market, or when refining the strategy in subgames of a much larger game. Recently, offline meta-learning was used to accelerate one-sided equilibrium finding on such distributions. We build upon this, extending the framework to the more challenging self-play setting, which is the basis for most state-of-the-art equilibrium approximation algorithms for domains at scale. When selecting the strategy, our method uniquely integrates information across all decision states, promoting global communication as opposed to the traditional local regret decomposition. Empirical evaluation on normal-form games and river poker subgames shows our meta-learned algorithms considerably outperform other state-of-the-art regret minimization algorithms.

Related papers

• Online Learning and Solving Infinite Games with an ERM Oracle [20.1330044382824]
  We propose an algorithm for online binary classification setting that relies solely on ERM oracle calls. We show that it has finite regret in the realizable setting and sublinearly growing regret in the agnostic setting. Our algorithms apply to both binary-valued and real-valued games and can be viewed as providing justification for the wide use of double oracle and multiple oracle algorithms in the practice of solving large games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T12:51:21Z)
• Hardness of Independent Learning and Sparse Equilibrium Computation in Markov Games [70.19141208203227]
  We consider the problem of decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning in Markov games. We show that no algorithm attains no-regret in general-sum games when executed independently by all players. We show that our lower bounds hold even for seemingly easier setting in which all agents are controlled by a centralized algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T03:28:12Z)
• Learning not to Regret [19.945846614714167]
  We present a novel "learning not to regret" framework, enabling us to meta-learn a regret minimizer tailored to a specific distribution. Our key contribution, Neural Predictive Regret Matching, is uniquely meta-learned to converge rapidly for the chosen distribution of games. Our experiments show that the meta-learned algorithms outpace their non-meta-learned counterparts, achieving more than tenfold improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T08:56:12Z)
• On the Convergence of No-Regret Learning Dynamics in Time-Varying Games [89.96815099996132]
  We characterize the convergence of optimistic gradient descent (OGD) in time-varying games. Our framework yields sharp convergence bounds for the equilibrium gap of OGD in zero-sum games. We also provide new insights on dynamic regret guarantees in static games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T17:25:45Z)
• Finding mixed-strategy equilibria of continuous-action games without gradients using randomized policy networks [83.28949556413717]
  We study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equilibrium of continuous-action game without access to gradients. We model players' strategies using artificial neural networks. This paper is the first to solve general continuous-action games with unrestricted mixed strategies and without any gradient information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T05:16:41Z)
• Learning Correlated Equilibria in Mean-Field Games [62.14589406821103]
  We develop the concepts of Mean-Field correlated and coarse-correlated equilibria. We show that they can be efficiently learnt in emphall games, without requiring any additional assumption on the structure of the game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T08:31:46Z)
• Regret Minimization and Convergence to Equilibria in General-sum Markov Games [57.568118148036376]
  We present the first algorithm for learning in general-sum Markov games that provides sublinear regret guarantees when executed by all agents. Our algorithm is decentralized, computationally efficient, and does not require any communication between agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-28T16:27:59Z)
• Model-Free Online Learning in Unknown Sequential Decision Making Problems and Games [114.90723492840499]
  In large two-player zero-sum imperfect-information games, modern extensions of counterfactual regret minimization (CFR) are currently the practical state of the art for computing a Nash equilibrium. We formalize an online learning setting in which the strategy space is not known to the agent. We give an efficient algorithm that achieves $O(T3/4)$ regret with high probability for that setting, even when the agent faces an adversarial environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T04:03:24Z)
• Hindsight and Sequential Rationality of Correlated Play [18.176128899338433]
  We look at algorithms that ensure strong performance in hindsight relative to what could have been achieved with modified behavior. We develop and advocate for this hindsight framing of learning in general sequential decision-making settings. We present examples illustrating the distinct strengths and weaknesses of each type of equilibrium in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T18:30:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.