Evaluating Large Language Models on Multiword Expressions in Multilingual and Code-Switched Contexts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20051v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:39:28 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Large Language Models on Multiword Expressions in Multilingual and Code-Switched Contexts
• Authors: Frances Laureano De Leon, Harish Tayyar Madabushi, Mark G. Lee,
• Abstract summary: This study evaluates how state-of-the-art language models process the ambiguity of potentially idiomatic multiword expressions.<n>We find that large language models, despite their strengths, struggle with nuanced language.
• Score: 2.519319150166215
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multiword expressions, characterised by non-compositional meanings and syntactic irregularities, are an example of nuanced language. These expressions can be used literally or idiomatically, leading to significant changes in meaning. While large language models have demonstrated strong performance across many tasks, their ability to handle such linguistic subtleties remains uncertain. Therefore, this study evaluates how state-of-the-art language models process the ambiguity of potentially idiomatic multiword expressions, particularly in contexts that are less frequent, where models are less likely to rely on memorisation. By evaluating models across in Portuguese and Galician, in addition to English, and using a novel code-switched dataset and a novel task, we find that large language models, despite their strengths, struggle with nuanced language. In particular, we find that the latest models, including GPT-4, fail to outperform the xlm-roBERTa-base baselines in both detection and semantic tasks, with especially poor performance on the novel tasks we introduce, despite its similarity to existing tasks. Overall, our results demonstrate that multiword expressions, especially those which are ambiguous, continue to be a challenge to models.

Related papers

• Infusing Prompts with Syntax and Semantics [0.0]
  We analyze the effect of directly infusing various kinds of syntactic and semantic information into large language models.<n>We show that linguistic analysis can significantly boost language models, to the point that we have surpassed previous best systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T23:49:38Z)
• Generating Continuations in Multilingual Idiomatic Contexts [2.0849578298972835]
  We test the ability of generative language models (LMs) in understanding nuanced language containing non-compositional figurative text. We conduct experiments using datasets in two distinct languages (English and Portuguese) under three different training settings. Our results suggest that the models are only slightly better at generating continuations for literal contexts than idiomatic contexts, with exceedingly small margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T05:40:33Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks [92.64781370921486]
  We present an extensive analysis of various benchmarks including a sentence planning benchmark with different granularities. After comparing large language models against state-of-the-start finetuned smaller models, we present a spectrum showing large language models falling behind, are comparable, or exceed the ability of smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T03:48:24Z)
• Tokenization Impacts Multilingual Language Modeling: Assessing Vocabulary Allocation and Overlap Across Languages [3.716965622352967]
  We propose new criteria to evaluate the quality of lexical representation and vocabulary overlap observed in sub-word tokenizers. Our findings show that the overlap of vocabulary across languages can be actually detrimental to certain downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T18:06:49Z)
• Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizations [0.0]
  We train neural models for a range of natural language processing tasks on a massively multilingual dataset of Bible translations in 1295 languages. The learned language representations are then compared to existing typological databases as well as to a novel set of quantitative syntactic and morphological features. We conclude that some generalizations are surprisingly close to traditional features from linguistic typology, but that most models, as well as those of previous work, do not appear to have made linguistically meaningful generalizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T15:09:59Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)
• Specializing Multilingual Language Models: An Empirical Study [50.7526245872855]
  Contextualized word representations from pretrained multilingual language models have become the de facto standard for addressing natural language tasks. For languages rarely or never seen by these models, directly using such models often results in suboptimal representation or use of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T18:13:55Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)
• Are Multilingual Models Effective in Code-Switching? [57.78477547424949]
  We study the effectiveness of multilingual language models to understand their capability and adaptability to the mixed-language setting. Our findings suggest that pre-trained multilingual models do not necessarily guarantee high-quality representations on code-switching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T16:20:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.