Perceptual Implications of Automatic Anonymization in Pathological Speech

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00409v1
• Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 09:03:03 GMT
• Title: Perceptual Implications of Automatic Anonymization in Pathological Speech
• Authors: Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Saba Afza, Tri-Thien Nguyen, Lukas Buess, Maryam Parvin, Tomas Arias-Vergara, Paula Andrea Perez-Toro, Hiu Ching Hung, Mahshad Lotfinia, Thomas Gorges, Elmar Noeth, Maria Schuster, Seung Hee Yang, Andreas Maier,
• Abstract summary: This study presents the first comprehensive human-centered analysis of anonymized pathological speech.<n>Listeners evaluated anonymized-original utterance pairs from 180 speakers.<n>No significant gender-based bias was observed.
• Score: 5.590563891072664
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Automatic anonymization techniques are essential for ethical sharing of pathological speech data, yet their perceptual consequences remain understudied. This study presents the first comprehensive human-centered analysis of anonymized pathological speech, using a structured perceptual protocol involving ten native and non-native German listeners with diverse linguistic, clinical, and technical backgrounds. Listeners evaluated anonymized-original utterance pairs from 180 speakers spanning Cleft Lip and Palate, Dysarthria, Dysglossia, Dysphonia, and age-matched healthy controls. Speech was anonymized using state-of-the-art automatic methods (equal error rates in the range of 30-40%). Listeners completed Turing-style discrimination and quality rating tasks under zero-shot (single-exposure) and few-shot (repeated-exposure) conditions. Discrimination accuracy was high overall (91% zero-shot; 93% few-shot), but varied by disorder (repeated-measures ANOVA: p=0.007), ranging from 96% (Dysarthria) to 86% (Dysphonia). Anonymization consistently reduced perceived quality (from 83% to 59%, p<0.001), with pathology-specific degradation patterns (one-way ANOVA: p=0.005). Native listeners rated original speech slightly higher than non-native listeners (Delta=4%, p=0.199), but this difference nearly disappeared after anonymization (Delta=1%, p=0.724). No significant gender-based bias was observed. Critically, human perceptual outcomes did not correlate with automatic privacy or clinical utility metrics. These results underscore the need for listener-informed, disorder- and context-specific anonymization strategies that preserve privacy while maintaining interpretability, communicative functions, and diagnostic utility, especially for vulnerable populations such as children.

Related papers

• Evaluating Spoken Language as a Biomarker for Automated Screening of Cognitive Impairment [37.40606157690235]
  Alterations in speech and language can be early predictors of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. We evaluated machine learning techniques for ADRD screening and severity prediction from spoken language. Risk stratification and linguistic feature importance analysis enhanced the interpretability and clinical utility of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T20:17:17Z)
• Prosody-Driven Privacy-Preserving Dementia Detection [3.9530780161144667]
  We aim to anonymize embeddings while preserving the diagnostic utility for dementia detection. We propose a novel approach that leverages domain knowledge to disentangle prosody features relevant to dementia from speaker embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T19:34:47Z)
• Non-Invasive Suicide Risk Prediction Through Speech Analysis [74.8396086718266]
  We present a non-invasive, speech-based approach for automatic suicide risk assessment. We extract three sets of features, including wav2vec, interpretable speech and acoustic features, and deep learning-based spectral representations. Our most effective speech model achieves a balanced accuracy of $66.2,%$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T12:33:57Z)
• The Impact of Speech Anonymization on Pathology and Its Limits [6.687980678659259]
  This study investigates anonymization's impact on pathological speech across over 2,700 speakers from multiple German institutions. Specific disorders such as Dysarthria, Dysphonia, and Cleft Lip and Palate experienced minimal utility changes, while Dysglossia showed slight improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T18:06:35Z)
• Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Prompting [61.20953109732442]
  We propose a locally differentially private mechanism called DP-Prompt to counter author de-anonymization attacks. When DP-Prompt is used with a powerful language model like ChatGPT (gpt-3.5), we observe a notable reduction in the success rate of de-anonymization attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T18:25:13Z)
• Automatically measuring speech fluency in people with aphasia: first achievements using read-speech data [55.84746218227712]
  This study aims at assessing the relevance of a signalprocessingalgorithm, initially developed in the field of language acquisition, for the automatic measurement of speech fluency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T07:51:40Z)
• On the Impact of Voice Anonymization on Speech Diagnostic Applications: a Case Study on COVID-19 Detection [13.227360396362707]
  There is growing interest in voice anonymization to preserve speaker privacy and identity. For affective computing and disease monitoring applications, however, the para-linguistic content may be more critical. We test three anonymization methods and their impact on five different state-of-the-art COVID-19 diagnostic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T01:09:58Z)
• Private, fair and accurate: Training large-scale, privacy-preserving AI models in medical imaging [47.99192239793597]
  We evaluated the effect of privacy-preserving training of AI models regarding accuracy and fairness compared to non-private training. Our study shows that -- under the challenging realistic circumstances of a real-life clinical dataset -- the privacy-preserving training of diagnostic deep learning models is possible with excellent diagnostic accuracy and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T09:49:13Z)
• Identification of Hypokinetic Dysarthria Using Acoustic Analysis of Poem Recitation [0.0]
  Up to 90 % of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from hypokinetic dysarthria (HD) We analysed the power of conventional speech features imprecise articulation, dysprosody, speech dysfluency and speech quality deterioration extracted from a specialized poem recitation task to discriminate HD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T11:45:01Z)
• Investigation of Data Augmentation Techniques for Disordered Speech Recognition [69.50670302435174]
  This paper investigates a set of data augmentation techniques for disordered speech recognition. Both normal and disordered speech were exploited in the augmentation process. The final speaker adapted system constructed using the UASpeech corpus and the best augmentation approach based on speed perturbation produced up to 2.92% absolute word error rate (WER)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T17:09:22Z)
• Mitigating Biases in Toxic Language Detection through Invariant Rationalization [70.36701068616367]
  biases toward some attributes, including gender, race, and dialect, exist in most training datasets for toxicity detection. We propose to use invariant rationalization (InvRat), a game-theoretic framework consisting of a rationale generator and a predictor, to rule out the spurious correlation of certain syntactic patterns. Our method yields lower false positive rate in both lexical and dialectal attributes than previous debiasing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T08:49:52Z)
• NUVA: A Naming Utterance Verifier for Aphasia Treatment [49.114436579008476]
  Assessment of speech performance using picture naming tasks is a key method for both diagnosis and monitoring of responses to treatment interventions by people with aphasia (PWA) Here we present NUVA, an utterance verification system incorporating a deep learning element that classifies 'correct' versus'incorrect' naming attempts from aphasic stroke patients. When tested on eight native British-English speaking PWA the system's performance accuracy ranged between 83.6% to 93.6%, with a 10-fold cross-validation mean of 89.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T13:00:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.