ImageR: Enhancing Bug Report Clarity by Screenshots
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01925v1
- Date: Sat, 03 May 2025 21:31:40 GMT
- Title: ImageR: Enhancing Bug Report Clarity by Screenshots
- Abstract summary: We introduce ImageR, an AI model and tool that analyzes issue reports to assess the potential benefits of including screenshots.<n>By proactively suggesting relevant visuals, ImageR aims to make issue reports clearer, more informative, and time-efficient.<n>We have curated and publicly shared a dataset comprising 6,235 Bugzilla issues, each meticulously labeled with the type of image attachment.
- Score: 2.0749231618270803
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In issue-tracking systems, incorporating screenshots significantly enhances the clarity of bug reports, facilitating more efficient communication and expediting issue resolution. However, determining when and what type of visual content to include remains challenging, as not all attachments effectively contribute to problem-solving; studies indicate that 22.5% of images in issue reports fail to aid in resolving the reported issues. To address this, we introduce ImageR, an AI model and tool that analyzes issue reports to assess the potential benefits of including screenshots and recommends the most pertinent types when appropriate. By proactively suggesting relevant visuals, ImageR aims to make issue reports clearer, more informative, and time-efficient. We have curated and publicly shared a dataset comprising 6,235 Bugzilla issues, each meticulously labeled with the type of image attachment, providing a valuable resource for benchmarking and advancing research in image processing within developer communication contexts. To evaluate ImageR, we conducted empirical experiments on a subset of these reports from various Mozilla projects. The tool achieved an F1-score of 0.76 in determining when images are needed, with 75% of users finding its recommendations highly valuable. By minimizing the back-and-forth communication often needed to obtain suitable screenshots, ImageR streamlines the bug reporting process. Furthermore, it guides users in selecting the most effective visual documentation from ten established categories, potentially reducing resolution times and improving the quality of bug documentation. ImageR is open-source, inviting further use and improvement by the community. The labeled dataset offers a rare resource for benchmarking and exploring image processing in the context of developer communication.
Related papers
- A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Efficient Prompt Selection in Microscopy Vision-Language Models [1.5824473848781937]
Deep-learning pipelines for microscopy image classification often require expensive, labor- and time-intensive expert annotation to produce high-quality ground truth for training.<n>Recent work has shown that prompt tuning of vision-language models can reduce manual annotation by constructing a small prompt set of expert-verified image-caption exemplars.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T21:02:43Z) - OFFSET: Segmentation-based Focus Shift Revision for Composed Image Retrieval [59.377821673653436]
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is capable of expressing users' intricate retrieval requirements flexibly.<n>CIR remains in its nascent stages due to two limitations: 1) inhomogeneity between dominant and noisy portions in visual data is ignored, leading to query feature degradation.<n>This work presents a focus mapping-based feature extractor, which consists of two modules: dominant portion segmentation and dual focus mapping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T03:27:46Z) - Multimodal Reasoning Agent for Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval [52.709090256954276]
Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval (ZS-CIR) aims to retrieve target images given a compositional query.<n>We propose a novel framework by employing a Multimodal Reasoning Agent (MRA) for ZS-CIR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T13:17:50Z) - Highlighting What Matters: Promptable Embeddings for Attribute-Focused Image Retrieval [15.961591012060763]
We evaluate current text-to-image (T2I) retrievers on handling attribute-focused queries.<n>We find that CLIP-like retrievers have poor and imbalanced performance.<n>We propose to use promptable image embeddings enabled by these multimodal retrievers, which boost performance by highlighting required attributes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T17:38:06Z) - Picking the Cream of the Crop: Visual-Centric Data Selection with Collaborative Agents [62.616106562146776]
We propose a textbfVisual-Centric textbfSelection approach via textbfAgents Collaboration (ViSA)<n>Our approach consists of 1) an image information quantification method via visual agents collaboration to select images with rich visual information, and 2) a visual-centric instruction quality assessment method to select high-quality instruction data related to high-quality images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T09:37:30Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Composed Image Retrieval [54.54527281731775]
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is an emerging yet challenging task that allows users to search for target images using a multimodal query.<n>There is currently no comprehensive review of CIR to provide a timely overview of this field.<n>We synthesize insights from over 120 publications in top conferences and journals, including ACM TOIS, SIGIR, and CVPR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T01:37:24Z) - BRIDGE: Bridging Gaps in Image Captioning Evaluation with Stronger Visual Cues [47.213906345208315]
We propose BRIDGE, a new learnable and reference-free image captioning metric.
Our proposal achieves state-of-the-art results compared to existing reference-free evaluation scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T18:00:17Z) - Visual Haystacks: A Vision-Centric Needle-In-A-Haystack Benchmark [63.296342841358815]
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have made significant strides in visual question-answering for single images.<n>The ability to process a large number of visual tokens does not guarantee effective retrieval and reasoning for multi-image question answering.<n>We introduce MIRAGE, an open-source, lightweight visual-RAG framework that processes up to 10k images on a single 40G A100 GPU.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-18T17:59:30Z) - Negative Results of Image Processing for Identifying Duplicate Questions on Stack Overflow [2.2667044928324747]
We investigated image-based techniques for identifying duplicate questions on Stack Overflow.
We implemented two methods of image analysis: first, integrating the text from images into the question text, and second, evaluating the images based on their visual content using image captions.
Our work lays the foundation for easy replication and hypothesis validation, allowing future research to build upon our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T00:14:21Z) - The Solution for the ICCV 2023 1st Scientific Figure Captioning Challenge [19.339645217996235]
We propose a solution for improving the quality of captions generated for figures in papers.
Our approach ranked first in the final test with a score of 4.49.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T03:03:50Z) - Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation [59.60445111432934]
Metrics Reloaded is a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics.
The framework was developed in a multi-stage Delphi process and is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint.
Based on the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-03T15:56:51Z) - Two-stage Visual Cues Enhancement Network for Referring Image
Segmentation [89.49412325699537]
Referring Image (RIS) aims at segmenting the target object from an image referred by one given natural language expression.
In this paper, we tackle this problem by devising a Two-stage Visual cues enhancement Network (TV-Net)
Through the two-stage enhancement, our proposed TV-Net enjoys better performances in learning fine-grained matching behaviors between the natural language expression and image.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-09T02:53:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.