Privacy Risks and Preservation Methods in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02828v1
• Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 17:53:28 GMT
• Title: Privacy Risks and Preservation Methods in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review
• Authors: Sonal Allana, Mohan Kankanhalli, Rozita Dara,
• Abstract summary: We conduct a scoping review of existing literature to elicit details on the conflict between privacy and explainability.<n>We extracted 57 articles from 1,943 studies published from January 2019 to December 2024.<n>We categorize the privacy risks and preservation methods in XAI and propose the characteristics of privacy preserving explanations.
• Score: 1.2744523252873352
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a pillar of Trustworthy AI and aims to bring transparency in complex models that are opaque by nature. Despite the benefits of incorporating explanations in models, an urgent need is found in addressing the privacy concerns of providing this additional information to end users. In this article, we conduct a scoping review of existing literature to elicit details on the conflict between privacy and explainability. Using the standard methodology for scoping review, we extracted 57 articles from 1,943 studies published from January 2019 to December 2024. The review addresses 3 research questions to present readers with more understanding of the topic: (1) what are the privacy risks of releasing explanations in AI systems? (2) what current methods have researchers employed to achieve privacy preservation in XAI systems? (3) what constitutes a privacy preserving explanation? Based on the knowledge synthesized from the selected studies, we categorize the privacy risks and preservation methods in XAI and propose the characteristics of privacy preserving explanations to aid researchers and practitioners in understanding the requirements of XAI that is privacy compliant. Lastly, we identify the challenges in balancing privacy with other system desiderata and provide recommendations for achieving privacy preserving XAI. We expect that this review will shed light on the complex relationship of privacy and explainability, both being the fundamental principles of Trustworthy AI.

Related papers

• Countering Privacy Nihilism [2.6212127510234797]
  AI may be presumed capable of inferring "everything from everything"<n>Discarding data categories as a normative anchoring in privacy and data protection is what we call privacy nihilism.<n>We propose moving away from privacy frameworks that focus solely on data type, neglecting all other factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T09:52:18Z)
• Smoke Screens and Scapegoats: The Reality of General Data Protection Regulation Compliance -- Privacy and Ethics in the Case of Replika AI [1.325665193924634]
  This paper takes a critical approach towards examining the intricacies of these issues within AI companion services. We analyze articles from public media about the company and its practices to gain insight into the trustworthiness of information provided in the policy. The results reveal despite privacy notices, data collection practices might harvest personal data without users' full awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T07:36:19Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.<n>We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.<n>State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory [43.12744258781724]
  We formulate the privacy issue as a reasoning problem rather than simple pattern matching.<n>We develop the first comprehensive checklist that covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T14:48:04Z)
• Privacy Risks of General-Purpose AI Systems: A Foundation for Investigating Practitioner Perspectives [47.17703009473386]
  Powerful AI models have led to impressive leaps in performance across a wide range of tasks. Privacy concerns have led to a wealth of literature covering various privacy risks and vulnerabilities of AI models. We conduct a systematic review of these survey papers to provide a concise and usable overview of privacy risks in GPAIS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T07:49:48Z)
• A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasures [50.987594546912725]
  Despite a growing corpus of research in AI privacy and explainability, there is little attention on privacy-preserving model explanations. This article presents the first thorough survey about privacy attacks on model explanations and their countermeasures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T12:44:48Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• GenAIPABench: A Benchmark for Generative AI-based Privacy Assistants [1.2642388972233845]
  This study introduces GenAIPABench, a benchmark for evaluating Generative AI-based Privacy Assistants (GenAIPAs) GenAIPABench includes: 1) A set of questions about privacy policies and data protection regulations, with annotated answers for various organizations and regulations; 2) Metrics to assess the accuracy, relevance, and consistency of responses; and 3) A tool for generating prompts to introduce privacy documents and varied privacy questions to test system robustness. We evaluated three leading genAI systems ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Bing AI using GenAIPABench to gauge their effectiveness as GenAIPAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-10T21:15:42Z)
• Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses [74.62641494122988]
  We conduct the first comprehensive survey on this topic. Through a concise introduction to the concept of FL, and a unique taxonomy covering: 1) threat models; 2) poisoning attacks and defenses against robustness; 3) inference attacks and defenses against privacy, we provide an accessible review of this important topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T12:11:45Z)
• More Than Privacy: Applying Differential Privacy in Key Areas of Artificial Intelligence [62.3133247463974]
  We show that differential privacy can do more than just privacy preservation in AI. It can also be used to improve security, stabilize learning, build fair models, and impose composition in selected areas of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T03:07:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.