A Unifying Bias-aware Multidisciplinary Framework for Investigating Socio-Technical Issues
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03593v1
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 14:52:04 GMT
- Title: A Unifying Bias-aware Multidisciplinary Framework for Investigating Socio-Technical Issues
- Authors: Sacha Hasan, Mehdi Rizvi, Yingfang Yuan, Kefan Chen, Lynne Baillie, Wei Pang,
- Abstract summary: This paper aims to bring together the disciplines of social science (SS) and computer science (CS)<n>Various analysis approaches from social science and machine learning (ML) were applied in a structured sequence to arrive at an original methodology of identifying and quantifying objects of inquiry.<n>A core feature of this framework is that it highlights where bias occurs and suggests possible steps to mitigate it.<n>To test our framework, we utilised it in the multidisciplinary investigation of the online harms encountered by minoritised ethnic (ME) communities when accessing and using digitalised social housing services in the UK.
- Score: 6.307051347179095
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper aims to bring together the disciplines of social science (SS) and computer science (CS) in the design and implementation of a novel multidisciplinary framework for systematic, transparent, ethically-informed, and bias-aware investigation of socio-technical issues. For this, various analysis approaches from social science and machine learning (ML) were applied in a structured sequence to arrive at an original methodology of identifying and quantifying objects of inquiry. A core feature of this framework is that it highlights where bias occurs and suggests possible steps to mitigate it. This is to improve the robustness, reliability, and explainability of the framework and its results. Such an approach also ensures that the investigation of socio-technical issues is transparent about its own limitations and potential sources of bias. To test our framework, we utilised it in the multidisciplinary investigation of the online harms encountered by minoritised ethnic (ME) communities when accessing and using digitalised social housing services in the UK. We draw our findings from 100 interviews with ME individuals in four cities across the UK to understand ME vulnerabilities when accessing and using digitalised social housing services. In our framework, a sub-sample of interviews focusing on ME individuals residing in social housing units were inductively coded. This resulted in the identification of the topics of discrimination, digital poverty, lack of digital literacy, and lack of English proficiency as key vulnerabilities of ME communities. Further ML techniques such as Topic Modelling and Sentiment Analysis were used within our framework where we found that Black African communities are more likely to experience these vulnerabilities in the access, use and outcome of digitalised social housing services.
Related papers
- A Preliminary Framework for Intersectionality in ML Pipelines [9.937132009954993]
We argue that machine learning technologies may not provide adequate support for societal identities and experiences.<n>We use this framework to evaluate and report on the (mis)alignments of intersectionality application in machine learning literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T16:57:56Z) - A survey of textual cyber abuse detection using cutting-edge language models and large language models [0.0]
We present a comprehensive analysis of the different forms of abuse prevalent in social media.<n>We focus on how emerging technologies, such as Language Models (LMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) are reshaping both the detection and generation of abusive content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T18:55:50Z) - The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologies [94.6762219597438]
We argue that many of these issues share a common core: a lack of awareness of the factors, context, and implications of the social environment in which NLP operates.<n>We argue that substantial challenges remain for NLP to develop social awareness and that we are just at the beginning of a new era for the field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T18:12:39Z) - Socialized Learning: A Survey of the Paradigm Shift for Edge Intelligence in Networked Systems [62.252355444948904]
This paper presents the findings of a literature review on the integration of edge intelligence (EI) and socialized learning (SL)
SL is a learning paradigm predicated on social principles and behaviors, aimed at amplifying the collaborative capacity and collective intelligence of agents.
We elaborate on three integrated components: socialized architecture, socialized training, and socialized inference, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-20T11:07:29Z) - Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal.
We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z) - The Sentiment Problem: A Critical Survey towards Deconstructing
Sentiment Analysis [9.379013474854776]
We investigate the sociotechnical aspects of sentiment analysis (SA) by critically examining 189 peer-reviewed papers on their applications, models, and datasets.
By delving into sociological and technological literature on sentiment, we unveil distinct conceptualizations of this term in domains such as finance, government, and medicine.
Our study exposes a lack of explicit definitions and frameworks for characterizing sentiment, resulting in potential challenges and biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T20:42:44Z) - False Information, Bots and Malicious Campaigns: Demystifying Elements
of Social Media Manipulations [6.901078062583646]
False information and persistent manipulation attacks on online social networks (OSNs) have affected the openness of OSNs.
This paper synthesizes insights from various disciplines to provide a comprehensive analysis of the manipulation landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T01:37:33Z) - Socio-economic landscape of digital transformation & public NLP systems:
A critical review [2.1030878979833467]
This paper constructs a broad taxonomy of NLP systems which impact or are impacted by the public''
This paper categorises thirty examples of these systems into seven families, namely; finance, customer service, policy making, education, healthcare, law, and security, based on their public use cases.
It then critically analyses these applications, first the priors and assumptions they are based on, then their mechanisms, possible methods of data collection, the models and error functions used, etc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T09:17:58Z) - Countering Malicious Content Moderation Evasion in Online Social
Networks: Simulation and Detection of Word Camouflage [64.78260098263489]
Twisting and camouflaging keywords are among the most used techniques to evade platform content moderation systems.
This article contributes significantly to countering malicious information by developing multilingual tools to simulate and detect new methods of evasion of content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-27T16:08:49Z) - Self-supervised Hypergraph Representation Learning for Sociological
Analysis [52.514283292498405]
We propose a fundamental methodology to support the further fusion of data mining techniques and sociological behavioral criteria.
First, we propose an effective hypergraph awareness and a fast line graph construction framework.
Second, we propose a novel hypergraph-based neural network to learn social influence flowing from users to users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-22T01:20:29Z) - Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings.
The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms.
Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z) - Cognitive Analysis of Security Threats on Social Networking Services:
Slovakia in need of stronger action [0.0]
The paper begins with an introduction on the necessity of security threat identification on social networking services (SNSs)
It introduces a use case study focused on the announcement of the UK snap general election 2017.
The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate some of the possibilities of social networking services analysis in the field of international relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T11:56:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.