ComPO: Preference Alignment via Comparison Oracles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05465v1
• Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 17:56:57 GMT
• Title: ComPO: Preference Alignment via Comparison Oracles
• Authors: Peter Chen, Xi Chen, Wotao Yin, Tianyi Lin,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new preference alignment method based on comparison oracles and provide the convergence guarantee for its basic scheme.<n>A highlight of our work is that we evidence the importance of designing specialized methods for preference pairs with distinct likelihood margin.
• Score: 36.81379432115315
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Direct alignment methods are increasingly used for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, these methods suffer from the issues of verbosity and likelihood displacement, which can be driven by the noisy preference pairs that induce similar likelihood for preferred and dispreferred responses. The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, we propose a new preference alignment method based on comparison oracles and provide the convergence guarantee for its basic scheme. Second, we improve our method using some heuristics and conduct the experiments to demonstrate the flexibility and compatibility of practical scheme in improving the performance of LLMs using noisy preference pairs. Evaluations are conducted across multiple base and instruction-tuned models (Mistral-7B, Llama-3-8B and Gemma-2-9B) with benchmarks (AlpacaEval 2, MT-Bench and Arena-Hard). Experimental results show the effectiveness of our method as an alternative to addressing the limitations of existing direct alignment methods. A highlight of our work is that we evidence the importance of designing specialized methods for preference pairs with distinct likelihood margin, which complements the recent findings in \citet{Razin-2025-Unintentional}.

Related papers

• Calibrated Multi-Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion Models [92.90660301195396]
  Calibrated Preference Optimization (CaPO) is a novel method to align text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models.<n>CaPO incorporates the general preference from multiple reward models without human annotated data.<n> Experimental results show that CaPO consistently outperforms prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T18:59:23Z)
• The Differences Between Direct Alignment Algorithms are a Blur [3.0059120458540383]
  We show that one-stage methods (e.g. ORPO, ASFT) underperform compared to two-stage approaches.<n>We demonstrate that adapting them to a two-stage setup with an explicit SFT phase can improve their performance.<n>Our comprehensive analysis reveals that the choice between pairwise and pointwise objectives is the primary determinant of alignment success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T10:54:14Z)
• Refining Alignment Framework for Diffusion Models with Intermediate-Step Preference Ranking [50.325021634589596]
  We propose a Tailored Optimization Preference (TailorPO) framework for aligning diffusion models with human preference.<n>Our approach directly ranks intermediate noisy samples based on their step-wise reward, and effectively resolves the gradient direction issues.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the model's ability to generate aesthetically pleasing and human-preferred images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T16:08:43Z)
• Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [19.02679077706812]
  We study the problem of aligning large language models with human preference data.<n>We propose direct preference optimization (Cal-DPO), a simple yet effective algorithm.<n>The results of our experiments on a variety of standard benchmarks show that Cal-DPO remarkably improves off-the-shelf methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T04:31:56Z)
• SAIL: Self-Improving Efficient Online Alignment of Large Language Models [56.59644677997827]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback is a key method for aligning large language models with human preferences. Recent literature has focused on designing online RLHF methods but still lacks a unified conceptual formulation. Our approach significantly improves alignment performance on open-sourced datasets with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T18:05:35Z)
• Mitigating Boundary Ambiguity and Inherent Bias for Text Classification in the Era of Large Language Models [24.085614720512744]
  This study shows that large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to changes in the number and arrangement of options in text classification. Key bottleneck arises from ambiguous decision boundaries and inherent biases towards specific tokens and positions. Our approach is grounded in the empirical observation that pairwise comparisons can effectively alleviate boundary ambiguity and inherent bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T06:53:19Z)
• ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [59.10763211091664]
  We propose an iterative alignment approach that integrates noise-tolerance and filtering of noisy samples without the aid of external models. Experiments on three widely-used datasets with Mistral-7B and Llama-2-7B demonstrate that ROPO significantly outperforms existing preference alignment methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T13:58:51Z)
• Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment [105.34140537748546]
  We propose an improved alignment approach named FIGA. Different from prior methods, we incorporate fine-grained quality signals that are derived by contrasting good and bad responses. Our approach has made two major contributions. Firstly, we curate a refined alignment dataset that pairs initial responses and the corresponding revised ones. Secondly, we devise a new loss function can leverage fine-grained quality signals to instruct the learning of LLMs for alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T15:36:40Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.