The cognitive triple-slit experiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05497v2
• Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:07:39 GMT
• Title: The cognitive triple-slit experiment
• Authors: Luca Sassoli de Bianchi, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,
• Abstract summary: We show that while quantum entities and human concepts may share a same conceptual nature, the way they manifest it in specific contexts can be quite different.<n>This is also evident from the significant deviation from zero observed for the Sorkin parameter, indicating the presence of strong irreducible third-order interference contributions in human decision.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum cognition has made it possible to model human cognitive processes very effectively, revealing numerous parallels between the properties of conceptual entities tested by the human mind and those of microscopic entities tested by measurement apparatuses. The success of quantum cognition has also made it possible to formulate an interpretation of quantum mechanics, called the conceptuality interpretation, which ascribes to quantum entities a conceptual nature similar to that of human concepts. The present work fits into these lines of research by analyzing a cognitive version of single, double, and triple-slit experiments. The data clearly show the formation of the typical interference fringes between the slits as well as the embryos of secondary fringes. Our analysis also shows that while quantum entities and human concepts may share a same conceptual nature, the way they manifest it in specific contexts can be quite different. This is also evident from the significant deviation from zero observed for the Sorkin parameter, indicating the presence of strong irreducible third-order interference contributions in human decision.

Related papers

• Towards a Generalized Theory of Observers [41.94295877935867]
  We argue that observers serve as indispensable reference points for measurement, reference frames, and the emergence of meaning.<n>We show how this formalism sheds new light on debates related to consciousness, quantum measurement, and computational boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T19:35:55Z)
• Quantum Models of Consciousness from a Quantum Information Science Perspective [0.0]
  This perspective explores various quantum models of consciousness from the viewpoint of quantum information science.<n>The models under consideration can be categorized into three distinct groups based on the level at which quantum mechanics might operate within the brain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T06:31:03Z)
• From Quantum Cognition to Conceptuality Interpretation II: Unraveling the Quantum Mysteries [0.0]
  An overview of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented, along with an explanation of how it sheds light on key quantum and relativistic phenomena.<n>We show how the interpretation clarifies Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, wave function-based and entanglement-based nonlocality, interference effects resulting from the superposition principle, delayed choice experiments, quantum measurements, the mechanism of quantization.<n>We argue that the interpretation can also elucidate relativistic effects, focusing on time dilation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T06:05:25Z)
• From Quantum Cognition to Conceptuality Interpretation I: Tracing the Brussels Group's Intellectual Journey [0.0]
  The article sketches the essential steps of the intellectual journey going from the first applications of quantum notions and formalisms to human cognition.<n>This was done by drawing numerous parallels with the human conceptual domain and suggesting the existence of a level of cognitive activity that would underlie our physical reality.<n>An increased cross-fertilization between the conceptuality interpretation and quantum cognition is to be expected in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T00:22:51Z)
• Quantum panprotopsychism and the structure and subject-summing combination problem [0.0]
  We show that the subject-summing problem originally posed by William James is probably the first and most important combination problem of panpsychism. We turn to the notion of subject of experience inspired by the idea of prehension proposed by Whitehead. The analysis imposes conditions on possible implementations of quantum cognition mechanisms in the brain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T16:47:57Z)
• High-dimensional monitoring and the emergence of realism via multiple observers [41.94295877935867]
  Correlation is the basic mechanism of every measurement model.<n>We introduce a model that interpolates between weak and strong non-selective measurements for qudits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-13T13:42:19Z)
• Intrinsic Physical Concepts Discovery with Object-Centric Predictive Models [86.25460882547581]
  We introduce the PHYsical Concepts Inference NEtwork (PHYCINE), a system that infers physical concepts in different abstract levels without supervision. We show that object representations containing the discovered physical concepts variables could help achieve better performance in causal reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T11:52:21Z)
• A Quantum-Classical Model of Brain Dynamics [62.997667081978825]
  Mixed Weyl symbol is used to describe brain processes at the microscopic level. Electromagnetic fields and phonon modes involved in the processes are treated either classically or semi-classically. Zero-point quantum effects can be incorporated into numerical simulations by controlling the temperature of each field mode.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T15:16:21Z)
• Quantum Structure in Human Perception [0.0]
  We investigate the ways in which the quantum structures of superposition, contextuality, and entanglement have their origins in human perception itself. Our analysis takes us from a simple quantum measurement model, along how human perception incorporates the warping mechanism of categorical perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-07T13:59:23Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Experimental progress on quantum coherence: detection, quantification, and manipulation [55.41644538483948]
  Recently there has been significant interest in the characterization of quantum coherence as a resource. We discuss the main platforms for realizing the experiments: linear optics, nuclear magnetic resonance, and superconducting systems. We also review experiments exploring the connections between coherence and uncertainty relations, path information, and coherence of operations and measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-14T14:30:47Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Direct estimation of quantum coherence by collective measurements [54.97898890263183]
  We introduce a collective measurement scheme for estimating the amount of coherence in quantum states. Our scheme outperforms other estimation methods based on tomography or adaptive measurements. We show that our method is accessible with today's technology by implementing it experimentally with photons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T03:50:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.