Justiça Algorítmica: Instrumentalização, Limites Conceituais e Desafios na Engenharia de Software

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07132v1
• Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 22:08:32 GMT
• Title: Justiça Algorítmica: Instrumentalização, Limites Conceituais e Desafios na Engenharia de Software
• Authors: Lucas Rodrigues Valença, Ronnie de Souza Santos,
• Abstract summary: This article describes ongoing research with the aim of understanding the concept of justice in the field of software engineering.<n>The expansion of the field of study called algorithmic justice'' fundamentally consists in the creation of mechanisms and procedures to conceptualize, evaluate and reduce biases and discrimination caused by algorithms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This article describes ongoing research with the aim of understanding the concept of justice in the field of software engineering, the factors that underlie the creation and instrumentalization of these concepts, and the limitations faced by software engineering when applying them. The expansion of the field of study called ``algorithmic justice'' fundamentally consists in the creation of mechanisms and procedures based on mathematical and formal procedures to conceptualize, evaluate and reduce biases and discrimination caused by algorithms. We conducted a systematic mapping in the context of justice in software engineering, comprising the metrics and definitions of algorithmic justice, as well as the procedures and techniques for fairer decision-making systems. We propose a discussion about the limitations that arise due to the understanding of justice as an attribute of software and the result of decision-making, as well as the influence that the field suffers from the construction of computational thinking, which is constantly developed around abstractions. Finally, we reflect on potential paths that could help us move beyond the limits of algorithmic justice.

Related papers

• Position: We Need An Algorithmic Understanding of Generative AI [7.425924654036041]
  This position paper proposes AlgEval: a framework for systematic research into the algorithms that LLMs learn and use.<n>AlgEval aims to uncover algorithmic primitives, reflected in latent representations, attention, and inference-time compute, and their algorithmic composition to solve task-specific problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T08:38:47Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Inference-Time Computations for LLM Reasoning and Planning: A Benchmark and Insights [49.42133807824413]
  We examine the reasoning and planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in solving complex tasks.<n>Recent advances in inference-time techniques demonstrate the potential to enhance LLM reasoning without additional training.<n>OpenAI's o1 model shows promising performance through its novel use of multi-step reasoning and verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T04:11:29Z)
• Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability [61.44773053835185]
  Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities.<n>Despite recent progress toward these goals, there are many open problems in the field that require solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:57:18Z)
• Beyond transparency: computational reliabilism as an externalist epistemology of algorithms [0.0]
  Current approaches to justification the transparency of algorithms involve elucidating their internal mechanisms.<n>In contrast, advocate for an externalist algorithm that I term reliam (CR)<n>CR posits that an algorithm's output is justified if it is produced by a reliable algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T14:31:47Z)
• Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective [31.882207568746168]
  This survey delves into the existing literature on algorithmic fairness, specifically highlighting its multifaceted social consequences. We introduce a novel taxonomy based on 'tolerance', a term we define as the degree to which variations in fairness outcomes are acceptable. Our systematic review covers diverse industries, revealing critical insights into the balance between algorithmic decision making and social equity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T08:16:54Z)
• Mathematical Algorithm Design for Deep Learning under Societal and Judicial Constraints: The Algorithmic Transparency Requirement [65.26723285209853]
  We derive a framework to analyze whether a transparent implementation in a computing model is feasible. Based on previous results, we find that Blum-Shub-Smale Machines have the potential to establish trustworthy solvers for inverse problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T15:32:38Z)
• Measuring, Interpreting, and Improving Fairness of Algorithms using Causal Inference and Randomized Experiments [8.62694928567939]
  We present an algorithm-agnostic framework (MIIF) to Measure, Interpret, and Improve the Fairness of an algorithmic decision. We measure the algorithm bias using randomized experiments, which enables the simultaneous measurement of disparate treatment, disparate impact, and economic value. We also develop an explainable machine learning model which accurately interprets and distills the beliefs of a blackbox algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T19:45:18Z)
• A Survey of Contextual Optimization Methods for Decision Making under Uncertainty [47.73071218563257]
  This review article identifies three main frameworks for learning policies from data and discusses their strengths and limitations. We present the existing models and methods under a uniform notation and terminology and classify them according to the three main frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-17T15:21:02Z)
• Algorithms as Social-Ecological-Technological Systems: an Environmental Justice Lens on Algorithmic Audits [0.5076419064097732]
  This paper reframes algorithmic systems as intimately connected to and part of social and ecological systems. We propose a first-of-its-kind methodology for environmental justice-oriented algorithmic audits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T19:25:25Z)
• Warm-Starting and Quantum Computing: A Systematic Mapping Study [35.19840943615427]
  We collect and analyze scientific literature on warm-starting techniques in the quantum computing domain. We aim to help quantum software engineers to categorize warm-starting techniques and apply them in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-10T18:50:00Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Computability, Complexity, Consistency and Controllability: A Four C's Framework for cross-disciplinary Ethical Algorithm Research [1.8275108630751844]
  We set out a framework which we believe is useful for fostering cross-disciplinary understanding of pertinent issues in ethical algorithmic literature. We provide examples of how insights from ethics, philosophy and population ethics are relevant to and translatable within sciences concerned with the study and design of algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T17:03:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.