Integrative Analysis and Imputation of Multiple Data Streams via Deep Gaussian Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12076v1
• Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:32:52 GMT
• Title: Integrative Analysis and Imputation of Multiple Data Streams via Deep Gaussian Processes
• Authors: Ali Akbar Septiandri, Deyu Ming, F. Alejandro DiazDelaO, Takoua Jendoubi, Samiran Ray,
• Abstract summary: Healthcare data presents three key challenges for analysis.<n>First, physiological measurements come from different sources but are inherently related.<n>Second, clinical measurements are collected at irregular intervals, and these sampling times can carry clinical meaning.
• Score: 0.10870620888258162
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Healthcare data, particularly in critical care settings, presents three key challenges for analysis. First, physiological measurements come from different sources but are inherently related. Yet, traditional methods often treat each measurement type independently, losing valuable information about their relationships. Second, clinical measurements are collected at irregular intervals, and these sampling times can carry clinical meaning. Finally, the prevalence of missing values. Whilst several imputation methods exist to tackle this common problem, they often fail to address the temporal nature of the data or provide estimates of uncertainty in their predictions. We propose using deep Gaussian process emulation with stochastic imputation, a methodology initially conceived to deal with computationally expensive models and uncertainty quantification, to solve the problem of handling missing values that naturally occur in critical care data. This method leverages longitudinal and cross-sectional information and provides uncertainty estimation for the imputed values. Our evaluation of a clinical dataset shows that the proposed method performs better than conventional methods, such as multiple imputations with chained equations (MICE), last-known value imputation, and individually fitted Gaussian Processes (GPs).

Related papers

• Deep Ensembles Meets Quantile Regression: Uncertainty-aware Imputation for Time Series [45.76310830281876]
  We propose Quantile Sub-Ensembles, a novel method to estimate uncertainty with ensemble of quantile-regression-based task networks. Our method not only produces accurate imputations that is robust to high missing rates, but also is computationally efficient due to the fast training of its non-generative model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T05:52:30Z)
• Time-dependent Iterative Imputation for Multivariate Longitudinal Clinical Data [0.0]
  Time-Dependent Iterative imputation offers a practical solution for imputing time-series data. When applied to a cohort consisting of more than 500,000 patient observations, our approach outperformed state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T16:10:49Z)
• Deep Imputation of Missing Values in Time Series Health Data: A Review with Benchmarking [0.0]
  This survey performs six data-centric experiments to benchmark state-of-the-art deep imputation methods on five time series health data sets. Deep learning methods that jointly perform cross-sectional (across variables) and longitudinal (across time) imputations of missing values in time series data yield statistically better data quality than traditional imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T16:03:36Z)
• Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
  Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare. Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions. We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z)
• To Impute or not to Impute? -- Missing Data in Treatment Effect Estimation [84.76186111434818]
  We identify a new missingness mechanism, which we term mixed confounded missingness (MCM), where some missingness determines treatment selection and other missingness is determined by treatment selection. We show that naively imputing all data leads to poor performing treatment effects models, as the act of imputation effectively removes information necessary to provide unbiased estimates. Our solution is selective imputation, where we use insights from MCM to inform precisely which variables should be imputed and which should not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T12:08:31Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Trajectories, bifurcations and pseudotime in large clinical datasets: applications to myocardial infarction and diabetes data [94.37521840642141]
  We suggest a semi-supervised methodology for the analysis of large clinical datasets, characterized by mixed data types and missing values. The methodology is based on application of elastic principal graphs which can address simultaneously the tasks of dimensionality reduction, data visualization, clustering, feature selection and quantifying the geodesic distances (pseudotime) in partially ordered sequences of observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T21:04:55Z)
• Performance metrics for intervention-triggering prediction models do not reflect an expected reduction in outcomes from using the model [71.9860741092209]
  Clinical researchers often select among and evaluate risk prediction models. Standard metrics calculated from retrospective data are only related to model utility under certain assumptions. When predictions are delivered repeatedly throughout time, the relationship between standard metrics and utility is further complicated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T16:26:49Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Variational-Recurrent Imputation Network for Clinical Time Series [5.485209961772906]
  We propose a novel variational-recurrent imputation network, which unifies an imputation and a prediction network. Specifically, we leverage the deep generative model in the imputation, which is based on the distribution among variables, and a recurrent imputation network to exploit the temporal relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T05:12:38Z)
• Uncertainty-Gated Stochastic Sequential Model for EHR Mortality Prediction [6.170898159041278]
  We present a novel variational recurrent network that estimates the distribution of missing variables, updates hidden states, and predicts the possibility of in-hospital mortality. It is noteworthy that our model can conduct these procedures in a single stream and learn all network parameters jointly in an end-to-end manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T04:41:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.