How Reliable is Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12201v1
• Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 02:32:35 GMT
• Title: How Reliable is Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge?
• Authors: Xiyan Fu, Wei Liu,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate five models from different model families across five diverse tasks involving 25 languages.<n>We find that consistency varies significantly across languages, with particularly poor performance in low-resource languages.<n>We propose an ensemble strategy which improves the consistency of the multilingual judge in real-world applications.
• Score: 11.639184489330368
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLM-as-a-Judge has emerged as a popular evaluation strategy, where advanced large language models assess generation results in alignment with human instructions. While these models serve as a promising alternative to human annotators, their reliability in multilingual evaluation remains uncertain. To bridge this gap, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge. Specifically, we evaluate five models from different model families across five diverse tasks involving 25 languages. Our findings reveal that LLMs struggle to achieve consistent judgment results across languages, with an average Fleiss' Kappa of approximately 0.3, and some models performing even worse. To investigate the cause of inconsistency, we analyze various influencing factors. We observe that consistency varies significantly across languages, with particularly poor performance in low-resource languages. Additionally, we find that neither training on multilingual data nor increasing model scale directly improves judgment consistency. These findings suggest that LLMs are not yet reliable for evaluating multilingual predictions. We finally propose an ensemble strategy which improves the consistency of the multilingual judge in real-world applications.

Related papers

• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• PolyMath: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning in Multilingual Contexts [79.84059473102778]
  PolyMath is a multilingual mathematical reasoning benchmark covering 18 languages and 4 easy-to-hard difficulty levels.<n>Our benchmark ensures difficulty comprehensiveness, language diversity, and high-quality translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T15:39:04Z)
• M-Prometheus: A Suite of Open Multilingual LLM Judges [64.22940792713713]
  We introduce M-Prometheus, a suite of open-weight LLM judges that can provide both direct assessment and pairwise comparison feedback on multilingual outputs.<n>M-Prometheus models outperform state-of-the-art open LLM judges on multilingual reward benchmarks spanning more than 20 languages, as well as on literary machine translation (MT) evaluation covering 4 language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T11:37:26Z)
• MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation [60.52580061637301]
  MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 13 typologically diverse languages with approximately 11,829 questions per language.<n>We evaluate 25 state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) using 5-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) and zero-shot prompting strategies, analyzing their performance across linguistic and cultural boundaries.<n>Our experiments reveal consistent performance degradation from high-resource languages to lower-resource ones, with the best models achieving over 70% accuracy on English but dropping to around 40% for languages like Swahili.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T15:59:20Z)
• Exploring the Multilingual NLG Evaluation Abilities of LLM-Based Evaluators [38.681443695708786]
  This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the multilingual evaluation performance of 10 recent LLMs.<n>We found that excluding the reference answer from the prompt leads to better performance across various languages.<n>Most LLM-based evaluators show a higher correlation with human judgments in high-resource languages than in low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T12:04:29Z)
• Exploring Robustness of LLMs to Sociodemographically-Conditioned Paraphrasing [7.312170216336085]
  We take a broader approach to explore a wider range of variations across sociodemographic dimensions.<n>We extend the SocialIQA dataset to create diverse paraphrased sets conditioned on sociodemographic styles.<n>We find that demographic-specific paraphrasing significantly impacts the performance of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T17:50:06Z)
• How Does Quantization Affect Multilingual LLMs? [50.867324914368524]
  Quantization techniques are widely used to improve inference speed and deployment of large language models. We conduct a thorough analysis of quantized multilingual LLMs, focusing on performance across languages and at varying scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:39:40Z)
• Language Ranker: A Metric for Quantifying LLM Performance Across High and Low-Resource Languages [48.40607157158246]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) perform better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate.<n>We propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations.<n>Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:53:16Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
  We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages. Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba) We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z)
• MELA: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability [7.524375463656369]
  We present the largest benchmark to date on linguistic acceptability: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability -- MELA, with 46K samples covering 10 languages. In pursuit of multilingual interpretability, we conduct probing experiments with fine-tuned XLM-R. Cross-lingual transfer experiments show that transfer in acceptability judgment is non-trivial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T15:25:28Z)
• Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language Models [7.478369203246005]
  We study the cross-lingual consistency (CLC) of factual knowledge in various multilingual PLMs.<n>We propose a Ranking-based Consistency (RankC) metric to evaluate knowledge consistency across languages independently from accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T13:19:17Z)
• Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? [20.476500441734427]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Their evaluation, particularly in languages beyond the top $20$, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T06:41:58Z)
• CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese [133.70911295934746]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive Chinese benchmark that covers various subjects, including natural science, social sciences, engineering, and humanities. CMMLU fills the gap in evaluating the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of large language models within the Chinese context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T15:49:51Z)
• Probing Multilingual Language Models for Discourse [0.0]
  We find that the XLM-RoBERTa family of models consistently show the best performance. Our results also indicate that model distillation may hurt the ability of cross-lingual transfer of sentence representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T06:34:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.