Recommender Systems for Democracy: Toward Adversarial Robustness in Voting Advice Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13329v1
• Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 16:38:06 GMT
• Title: Recommender Systems for Democracy: Toward Adversarial Robustness in Voting Advice Applications
• Authors: Frédéric Berdoz, Dustin Brunner, Yann Vonlanthen, Roger Wattenhofer,
• Abstract summary: Voting advice applications (VAAs) help millions of voters understand which political parties or candidates best align with their views.<n>This paper explores the potential risks these applications pose to the democratic process when targeted by adversarial entities.
• Score: 18.95453617434051
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Voting advice applications (VAAs) help millions of voters understand which political parties or candidates best align with their views. This paper explores the potential risks these applications pose to the democratic process when targeted by adversarial entities. In particular, we expose 11 manipulation strategies and measure their impact using data from Switzerland's primary VAA, Smartvote, collected during the last two national elections. We find that altering application parameters, such as the matching method, can shift a party's recommendation frequency by up to 105%. Cherry-picking questionnaire items can increase party recommendation frequency by over 261%, while subtle changes to parties' or candidates' responses can lead to a 248% increase. To address these vulnerabilities, we propose adversarial robustness properties VAAs should satisfy, introduce empirical metrics for assessing the resilience of various matching methods, and suggest possible avenues for research toward mitigating the effect of manipulation. Our framework is key to ensuring secure and reliable AI-based VAAs poised to emerge in the near future.

Related papers

• Beyond Reactive Safety: Risk-Aware LLM Alignment via Long-Horizon Simulation [69.63626052852153]
  We propose a proof-of-concept framework that projects how model-generated advice could propagate through societal systems.<n>We also introduce a dataset of 100 indirect harm scenarios, testing models' ability to foresee adverse, non-obvious outcomes from seemingly harmless user prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T02:28:58Z)
• A Cautionary Tale About "Neutrally" Informative AI Tools Ahead of the 2025 Federal Elections in Germany [41.972629376586035]
  We examine the reliability of AI-based Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) and large language models (LLMs) in providing objective political information.<n>Our analysis is based upon a comparison with party responses to 38 statements of the Wahl-O-Mat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T16:30:53Z)
• Investigating LLMs as Voting Assistants via Contextual Augmentation: A Case Study on the European Parliament Elections 2024 [22.471701390730185]
  In light of the recent 2024 European Parliament elections, we are investigating if LLMs can be used as Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) We evaluate MISTRAL and MIXTRAL models and evaluate their accuracy in predicting the stance of political parties based on the latest "EU and I" voting assistance questionnaire. We find that MIXTRAL is highly accurate with an 82% accuracy on average with a significant performance disparity across different political groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T13:29:28Z)
• Fast and Adaptive Questionnaires for Voting Advice Applications [6.91754515704176]
  This work introduces an adaptive questionnaire approach that selects subsequent questions based on users' previous answers. We validated our approach using the Smartvote dataset from the Swiss Federal elections in 2019. Our findings indicate that employing the I model both as encoder and decoder, combined with a PosteriorRMSE method for question selection, significantly improves the accuracy of recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T11:55:50Z)
• Employing Universal Voting Schemes for Improved Visual Place Recognition Performance [16.242139178368923]
  This paper analyses several voting schemes to maximise the place detection accuracy of a VPR ensemble set up. We take inspiration from a variety of voting schemes that are widely employed in fields such as politics and sociology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T14:19:14Z)
• Efficient Weighting Schemes for Auditing Instant-Runoff Voting Elections [57.67176250198289]
  AWAIRE involves adaptively weighted averages of test statistics, essentially "learning" an effective set of hypotheses to test. We explore schemes and settings more extensively, to identify and recommend efficient choices for practice. A limitation of the current AWAIRE implementation is its restriction to a small number of candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T10:13:01Z)
• Adaptively Weighted Audits of Instant-Runoff Voting Elections: AWAIRE [61.872917066847855]
  Methods for auditing instant-runoff voting (IRV) elections are either not risk-limiting or require cast vote records (CVRs), the voting system's electronic record of the votes on each ballot. We develop an RLA method that uses adaptively weighted averages of test supermartingales to efficiently audit IRV elections when CVRs are not available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T15:55:34Z)
• Improving City Life via Legitimate and Participatory Policy-making: A Data-driven Approach in Switzerland [2.5234156040689237]
  This paper focuses on a case study of 1,204 citizens in the city of Aarau, Switzerland. We analyze survey data containing insightful indicators that can impact the legitimacy of decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T13:38:39Z)
• Improving Selective Visual Question Answering by Learning from Your Peers [74.20167944693424]
  Visual Question Answering (VQA) models can have difficulties abstaining from answering when they are wrong. We propose Learning from Your Peers (LYP) approach for training multimodal selection functions for making abstention decisions. Our approach uses predictions from models trained on distinct subsets of the training data as targets for optimizing a Selective VQA model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T21:22:01Z)
• Vague Preference Policy Learning for Conversational Recommendation [48.868921530958666]
  Conversational recommendation systems commonly assume users have clear preferences, leading to potential over-filtering.<n>We introduce the Vague Preference Multi-round Conversational Recommendation (VPMCR) scenario, employing a soft estimation mechanism to accommodate users' vague and dynamic preferences.<n>Our work advances CRS by accommodating users' inherent ambiguity and relative decision-making processes, improving real-world applicability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T14:57:21Z)
• MS-Ranker: Accumulating Evidence from Potentially Correct Candidates for Answer Selection [59.95429407899612]
  We propose a novel reinforcement learning based multi-step ranking model, named MS-Ranker. We explicitly consider the potential correctness of candidates and update the evidence with a gating mechanism. Our model significantly outperforms existing methods that do not rely on external resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-10T10:36:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.