Traveling Across Languages: Benchmarking Cross-Lingual Consistency in Multimodal LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15075v4
• Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 14:15:44 GMT
• Title: Traveling Across Languages: Benchmarking Cross-Lingual Consistency in Multimodal LLMs
• Authors: Hao Wang, Pinzhi Huang, Jihan Yang, Saining Xie, Daisuke Kawahara,
• Abstract summary: We introduce two new benchmarks: KnowRecall and VisRecall.<n>KnowRecall is a visual question answering benchmark designed to measure factual knowledge consistency in 15 languages.<n>VisRecall assesses visual memory consistency by asking models to describe landmark appearances in 9 languages without access to images.
• Score: 38.26693373272882
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid evolution of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has significantly enhanced their real-world applications. However, achieving consistent performance across languages, especially when integrating cultural knowledge, remains a significant challenge. To better assess this issue, we introduce two new benchmarks: KnowRecall and VisRecall, which evaluate cross-lingual consistency in MLLMs. KnowRecall is a visual question answering benchmark designed to measure factual knowledge consistency in 15 languages, focusing on cultural and historical questions about global landmarks. VisRecall assesses visual memory consistency by asking models to describe landmark appearances in 9 languages without access to images. Experimental results reveal that state-of-the-art MLLMs, including proprietary ones, still struggle to achieve cross-lingual consistency. This underscores the need for more robust approaches that produce truly multilingual and culturally aware models.

Related papers

• MCIF: Multimodal Crosslingual Instruction-Following Benchmark from Scientific Talks [25.75895667904485]
  We introduce MCIF (Multimodal Crosslingual Instruction Following), the first multilingual human-annotated benchmark based on scientific talks.<n>MCF spans three core modalities--speech, vision, and text--and four diverse languages (English, German, Italian, and Chinese)<n>It enables a comprehensive evaluation of MLLMs' abilities to interpret instructions across languages and combine them with multimodal contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T19:00:51Z)
• Disentangling Language and Culture for Evaluating Multilingual Large Language Models [48.06219053598005]
  This paper introduces a Dual Evaluation Framework to comprehensively assess the multilingual capabilities of LLMs.<n>By decomposing the evaluation along the dimensions of linguistic medium and cultural context, this framework enables a nuanced analysis of LLMs' ability to process questions cross-lingually.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:25:45Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Model with Knowledge Oriented Language Specific Simple Question Answering [73.73820209993515]
  We introduce KoLasSimpleQA, the first benchmark evaluating the multilingual factual ability of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Inspired by existing research, we created the question set with features such as single knowledge point coverage, absolute objectivity, unique answers, and temporal stability.<n>Results show significant performance differences between the two domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T12:27:02Z)
• MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation [60.52580061637301]
  MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 13 typologically diverse languages with approximately 11,829 questions per language.<n>We evaluate 25 state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) using 5-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) and zero-shot prompting strategies, analyzing their performance across linguistic and cultural boundaries.<n>Our experiments reveal consistent performance degradation from high-resource languages to lower-resource ones, with the best models achieving over 70% accuracy on English but dropping to around 40% for languages like Swahili.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T15:59:20Z)
• All Languages Matter: Evaluating LMMs on Culturally Diverse 100 Languages [73.93600813999306]
  ALM-bench is the largest and most comprehensive effort to date for evaluating LMMs across 100 languages.<n>It challenges existing models by testing their ability to understand and reason about culturally diverse images paired with text in various languages.<n>The benchmark offers a robust and nuanced evaluation framework featuring various question formats, including true/false, multiple choice, and open-ended questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T15:44:42Z)
• Evaluating Knowledge-based Cross-lingual Inconsistency in Large Language Models [16.942897938964638]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional performance in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their successes, these models often exhibit significant inconsistencies when processing the same concepts across different languages. This study focuses on three primary questions: the existence of cross-lingual inconsistencies in LLMs, the specific aspects in which these inconsistencies manifest, and the correlation between cross-lingual consistency and multilingual capabilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T15:11:37Z)
• Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models [62.91524967852552]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora.<n>But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, i.e., be crosslingual?<n>This study evaluates state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:15:17Z)
• MLaKE: Multilingual Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models [65.10456412127405]
  MLaKE is a benchmark for the adaptability of knowledge editing methods across five languages.<n>MLaKE aggregates fact chains from Wikipedia across languages and generates questions in both free-form and multiple-choice.<n>We evaluate the multilingual knowledge editing generalization capabilities of existing methods on MLaKE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T15:23:28Z)
• A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias [5.096332588720052]
  We present an overview of MLLMs, covering their evolutions, key techniques, and multilingual capacities.<n>Thirdly, we survey the state-of-the-art studies of multilingual representations and investigate whether the current MLLMs can learn a universal language representation.<n>Fourthly, we discuss bias on MLLMs, including its categories, evaluation metrics, and debiasing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T05:13:56Z)
• MELA: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability [7.524375463656369]
  We present the largest benchmark to date on linguistic acceptability: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability -- MELA, with 46K samples covering 10 languages. In pursuit of multilingual interpretability, we conduct probing experiments with fine-tuned XLM-R. Cross-lingual transfer experiments show that transfer in acceptability judgment is non-trivial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T15:25:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.