Composable Cross-prompt Essay Scoring by Merging Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18548v1
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 06:28:21 GMT
• Title: Composable Cross-prompt Essay Scoring by Merging Models
• Authors: Sanwoo Lee, Kun Liang, Yunfang Wu,
• Abstract summary: Cross-prompt automated essay scoring typically trains models jointly on all source prompts.<n>We propose a source-free adaptation approach that selectively merges individually trained source models' parameters instead of datasets.
• Score: 7.5702468122067685
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in cross-prompt automated essay scoring (AES) typically train models jointly on all source prompts, often requiring additional access to unlabeled target prompt essays simultaneously. However, using all sources is suboptimal in our pilot study, and re-accessing source datasets during adaptation raises privacy concerns. We propose a source-free adaptation approach that selectively merges individually trained source models' parameters instead of datasets. In particular, we simulate joint training through linear combinations of task vectors -- the parameter updates from fine-tuning. To optimize the combination's coefficients, we propose Prior-encoded Information Maximization (PIM), an unsupervised objective which promotes the model's score discriminability regularized by priors pre-computed from the sources. We employ Bayesian optimization as an efficient optimizer of PIM. Experimental results with LLMs on in-dataset and cross-dataset adaptation show that our method (1) consistently outperforms training jointly on all sources, (2) maintains superior robustness compared to other merging methods, (3) excels under severe distribution shifts where recent leading cross-prompt methods struggle, all while retaining computational efficiency.

Related papers

• A Scalable Pretraining Framework for Link Prediction with Efficient Adaptation [16.82426251068573]
  Link Prediction (LP) is a critical task in graph machine learning.<n>Existing methods face key challenges including limited supervision from sparse connectivity.<n>We explore pretraining as a solution to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T17:10:31Z)
• Adaptive Sample Scheduling for Direct Preference Optimization [37.75208455935495]
  We introduce a novel problem: Sample Scheduling for DPO.<n>It aims to dynamically and adaptively schedule training samples based on the model's evolving states.<n>We propose SamS, an efficient and effective algorithm that adaptively selects samples in each training batch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T10:26:09Z)
• Probabilistic Federated Prompt-Tuning with Non-IID and Imbalanced Data [35.47385526394076]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained models is a popular approach in machine learning for solving complex tasks with moderate data.<n>Fine-tuning the entire pre-trained model is ineffective in federated data scenarios where local data distributions are diversely skewed.<n>Our approach transforms federated learning into a distributed set modeling task, aggregating diverse sets of prompts to globally fine-tune the pre-trained model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T04:31:34Z)
• Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training [81.4748965653345]
  We propose Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training (AITP) to align instruction tuning with pre-training distributions.<n>We show consistent performance improvements with AITP on three fully open large language models (LLMs) across eight benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T08:27:40Z)
• A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following [83.71180850955679]
  We use a novel synthetic data generation pipeline to generate 48,000 instruction unique-following prompts.<n>With our synthetic prompts, we use two preference dataset curation methods - rejection sampling (RS) and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)<n>Experiments reveal that shared prefixes in preference pairs, as generated by MCTS, provide marginal but consistent improvements.<n>High-contrast preference pairs generally outperform low-contrast pairs; however, combining both often yields the best performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T15:38:39Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.<n>We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.<n>We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• Federated Learning with Projected Trajectory Regularization [65.6266768678291]
  Federated learning enables joint training of machine learning models from distributed clients without sharing their local data. One key challenge in federated learning is to handle non-identically distributed data across the clients. We propose a novel federated learning framework with projected trajectory regularization (FedPTR) for tackling the data issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T02:12:08Z)
• Personalized Federated Learning under Mixture of Distributions [98.25444470990107]
  We propose a novel approach to Personalized Federated Learning (PFL), which utilizes Gaussian mixture models (GMM) to fit the input data distributions across diverse clients. FedGMM possesses an additional advantage of adapting to new clients with minimal overhead, and it also enables uncertainty quantification. Empirical evaluations on synthetic and benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method in both PFL classification and novel sample detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T20:04:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.