Can Large Language Models Infer Causal Relationships from Real-World Text?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18931v1
• Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 01:50:05 GMT
• Title: Can Large Language Models Infer Causal Relationships from Real-World Text?
• Authors: Ryan Saklad, Aman Chadha, Oleg Pavlov, Raha Moraffah,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) are capable of inferring causal relationships from real-world texts.<n>To the best of our knowledge, our benchmark is the first-ever real-world dataset for this task.
• Score: 2.602939322715435
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding and inferring causal relationships from texts is a core aspect of human cognition and is essential for advancing large language models (LLMs) towards artificial general intelligence. Existing work primarily focuses on synthetically generated texts which involve simple causal relationships explicitly mentioned in the text. This fails to reflect the complexities of real-world tasks. In this paper, we investigate whether LLMs are capable of inferring causal relationships from real-world texts. We develop a benchmark drawn from real-world academic literature which includes diverse texts with respect to length, complexity of relationships (different levels of explicitness, number of events, and causal relationships), and domains and sub-domains. To the best of our knowledge, our benchmark is the first-ever real-world dataset for this task. Our experiments on state-of-the-art LLMs evaluated on our proposed benchmark demonstrate significant challenges, with the best-performing model achieving an average F1 score of only 0.477. Analysis reveals common pitfalls: difficulty with implicitly stated information, in distinguishing relevant causal factors from surrounding contextual details, and with connecting causally relevant information spread across lengthy textual passages. By systematically characterizing these deficiencies, our benchmark offers targeted insights for further research into advancing LLM causal reasoning.

Related papers

• A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet their propensity for hallucination remains a critical challenge.<n>This report provides a comprehensive taxonomy of LLM hallucinations, beginning with a formal definition and a theoretical framework.<n>It analyzes the underlying causes, categorizing them into data-related issues, model-related factors, and prompt-related influences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T14:37:16Z)
• Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Chemistry-Centric Case Study [0.9424565541639368]
  We introduce a new benchmark consisting of a curated dataset and a defined evaluation process to assess the compositional reasoning capabilities of large language models within the chemistry domain.<n>Our approach integrates OpenAI reasoning models with named entity recognition (NER) systems to extract chemical entities from recent literature, which are then augmented with external knowledge bases to form a knowledge graph.<n>Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art models face significant challenges in multi-hop compositional reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T04:36:19Z)
• ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models [75.05436691700572]
  We introduce ExpliCa, a new dataset for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in explicit causal reasoning.<n>We tested seven commercial and open-source LLMs on ExpliCa through prompting and perplexity-based metrics.<n>Surprisingly, models tend to confound temporal relations with causal ones, and their performance is also strongly influenced by the linguistic order of the events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T14:23:14Z)
• Navigating Semantic Relations: Challenges for Language Models in Abstract Common-Sense Reasoning [5.4141465747474475]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in generating human-like text and solving problems of moderate complexity.<n>We systematically evaluate abstract common-sense reasoning in LLMs using the ConceptNet knowledge graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T20:20:24Z)
• Who Writes What: Unveiling the Impact of Author Roles on AI-generated Text Detection [44.05134959039957]
  We investigate how sociolinguistic attributes-gender, CEFR proficiency, academic field, and language environment-impact state-of-the-art AI text detectors.<n>Our results reveal significant biases: CEFR proficiency and language environment consistently affected detector accuracy, while gender and academic field showed detector-dependent effects.<n>These findings highlight the crucial need for socially aware AI text detection to avoid unfairly penalizing specific demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T07:49:31Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)
• Factual Dialogue Summarization via Learning from Large Language Models [35.63037083806503]
  Large language model (LLM)-based automatic text summarization models generate more factually consistent summaries. We employ zero-shot learning to extract symbolic knowledge from LLMs, generating factually consistent (positive) and inconsistent (negative) summaries. Our approach achieves better factual consistency while maintaining coherence, fluency, and relevance, as confirmed by various automatic evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T20:03:37Z)
• CausalBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causal Learning Capability of LLMs [27.362012903540492]
  The ability to understand causality significantly impacts the competence of large language models (LLMs) in output explanation and counterfactual reasoning. The ability to understand causality significantly impacts the competence of large language models (LLMs) in output explanation and counterfactual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T14:40:08Z)
• Discovery of the Hidden World with Large Language Models [95.58823685009727]
  This paper presents Causal representatiOn AssistanT (COAT) that introduces large language models (LLMs) to bridge the gap. LLMs are trained on massive observations of the world and have demonstrated great capability in extracting key information from unstructured data. COAT also adopts CDs to find causal relations among the identified variables as well as to provide feedback to LLMs to iteratively refine the proposed factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T12:18:54Z)
• Zero-shot Causal Graph Extrapolation from Text via LLMs [50.596179963913045]
  We evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to infer causal relations from natural language. LLMs show competitive performance in a benchmark of pairwise relations without needing (explicit) training samples. We extend our approach to extrapolating causal graphs through iterated pairwise queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T13:14:38Z)
• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• ERICA: Improving Entity and Relation Understanding for Pre-trained Language Models via Contrastive Learning [97.10875695679499]
  We propose a novel contrastive learning framework named ERICA in pre-training phase to obtain a deeper understanding of the entities and their relations in text. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed ERICA framework achieves consistent improvements on several document-level language understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T03:35:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.