Unveiling Dual Quality in Product Reviews: An NLP-Based Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19254v1
• Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 18:23:36 GMT
• Title: Unveiling Dual Quality in Product Reviews: An NLP-Based Approach
• Authors: Rafał Poświata, Marcin Michał Mirończuk, Sławomir Dadas, Małgorzata Grębowiec, Michał Perełkiewicz,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores how natural language processing (NLP) can aid in detecting such discrepancies.<n>We create a new Polish-language dataset with 1,957 reviews, 540 highlighting dual quality issues.<n>We then discuss experiments with various approaches like SetFit with sentence-transformers, transformer-based encoders, and LLMs, including error analysis and robustness verification.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Consumers often face inconsistent product quality, particularly when identical products vary between markets, a situation known as the dual quality problem. To identify and address this issue, automated techniques are needed. This paper explores how natural language processing (NLP) can aid in detecting such discrepancies and presents the full process of developing a solution. First, we describe in detail the creation of a new Polish-language dataset with 1,957 reviews, 540 highlighting dual quality issues. We then discuss experiments with various approaches like SetFit with sentence-transformers, transformer-based encoders, and LLMs, including error analysis and robustness verification. Additionally, we evaluate multilingual transfer using a subset of opinions in English, French, and German. The paper concludes with insights on deployment and practical applications.

Related papers

• CEA-LIST at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating LLMs as Detectors of Bias and Opinion in Text [3.9845507207125967]
  This paper presents a competitive approach to multilingual subjectivity detection using large language models (LLMs) with few-shot prompting.<n>We show that LLMs, when paired with carefully designed prompts, can match or outperform fine-tuned smaller language models (SLMs)<n>Our system achieved top rankings across multiple languages in the CheckThat! 2025 subjectivity detection task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T08:35:05Z)
• LLM-based Translation Inference with Iterative Bilingual Understanding [52.46978502902928]
  We propose a novel Iterative Bilingual Understanding Translation method based on the cross-lingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>The cross-lingual capability of LLMs enables the generation of contextual understanding for both the source and target languages separately.<n>The proposed IBUT outperforms several strong comparison methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T13:21:46Z)
• Questionnaires for Everyone: Streamlining Cross-Cultural Questionnaire Adaptation with GPT-Based Translation Quality Evaluation [6.8731197511363415]
  This work presents a prototype tool that can expedite the questionnaire translation process. The tool incorporates forward-backward translation using DeepL alongside GPT-4-generated translation quality evaluations and improvement suggestions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T07:34:40Z)
• QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine Translation [25.165239478219267]
  We propose a simple and effective way to avoid over-reliance on noisy quality estimates by using them as the energy function of a Gibbs distribution. Instead of looking for a mode in the distribution, we generate multiple samples from high-density areas through the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T17:36:06Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• On the Calibration of Multilingual Question Answering LLMs [57.296161186129545]
  We benchmark the calibration of several multilingual Large Language Models (MLLMs) on a variety of Question Answering tasks. We study different dimensions of calibration in in-distribution, out-of-distribution, and cross-lingual transfer settings. For decoder-only LLMs such as LlaMa2, we additionally find that in-context learning improves confidence calibration on multilingual data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T03:29:02Z)
• X-PARADE: Cross-Lingual Textual Entailment and Information Divergence across Paragraphs [55.80189506270598]
  X-PARADE is the first cross-lingual dataset of paragraph-level information divergences. Annotators label a paragraph in a target language at the span level and evaluate it with respect to a corresponding paragraph in a source language. Aligned paragraphs are sourced from Wikipedia pages in different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T04:34:55Z)
• Delving Deeper into Cross-lingual Visual Question Answering [115.16614806717341]
  We show that simple modifications to the standard training setup can substantially reduce the transfer gap to monolingual English performance. We analyze cross-lingual VQA across different question types of varying complexity for different multilingual multimodal Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T18:22:18Z)
• TextFlint: Unified Multilingual Robustness Evaluation Toolkit for Natural Language Processing [73.16475763422446]
  We propose a multilingual robustness evaluation platform for NLP tasks (TextFlint) It incorporates universal text transformation, task-specific transformation, adversarial attack, subpopulation, and their combinations to provide comprehensive robustness analysis. TextFlint generates complete analytical reports as well as targeted augmented data to address the shortcomings of the model's robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T17:20:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.