CODE-DITING: A Reasoning-Based Metric for Functional Alignment in Code Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19502v1
• Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 04:29:14 GMT
• Title: CODE-DITING: A Reasoning-Based Metric for Functional Alignment in Code Evaluation
• Abstract summary: We propose CODE-DITING, a novel code evaluation method that balances accuracy, efficiency and explainability.<n>We develop a data distillation framework that effectively transfers reasoning capabilities from DeepSeek-R1671B to our CODE-DITING 1.5B and 7B models.<n>With the majority vote strategy in the inference process, CODE-DITING 1.5B outperforms all models with the same magnitude of parameters.
• Score: 22.06897150825726
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Trustworthy evaluation methods for code snippets play a crucial role in neural code generation. Traditional methods, which either rely on reference solutions or require executable test cases, have inherent limitation in flexibility and scalability. The recent LLM-as-Judge methodology offers a promising alternative by directly evaluating functional consistency between the problem description and the generated code. To systematically understand the landscape of these LLM-as-Judge methods, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study across three diverse datasets. Our investigation reveals the pros and cons of two categories of LLM-as-Judge methods: the methods based on general foundation models can achieve good performance but require complex prompts and lack explainability, while the methods based on reasoning foundation models provide better explainability with simpler prompts but demand substantial computational resources due to their large parameter sizes. To address these limitations, we propose CODE-DITING, a novel code evaluation method that balances accuracy, efficiency and explainability. We develop a data distillation framework that effectively transfers reasoning capabilities from DeepSeek-R1671B to our CODE-DITING 1.5B and 7B models, significantly enhancing evaluation explainability and reducing the computational cost. With the majority vote strategy in the inference process, CODE-DITING 1.5B outperforms all models with the same magnitude of parameters and achieves performance which would normally exhibit in a model with 5 times of parameter scale. CODE-DITING 7B surpasses GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 671B, even though it only uses 1% of the parameter volume of these large models. Further experiments show that CODEDITING is robust to preference leakage and can serve as a promising alternative for code evaluation.

Related papers

• BERT-as-a-Judge: A Robust Alternative to Lexical Methods for Efficient Reference-Based LLM Evaluation [11.37493959290663]
  We introduce BERT-as-a-Judge, an encoder-driven approach for assessing answer correctness in reference-based generative settings.<n>We show that it consistently outperforms the lexical baseline while matching the performance of much larger LLM judges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T17:08:40Z)
• Teaching Language Models to Reason with Tools [73.21700643314917]
  We present emphHint-Engineering, a new data synthesis strategy that strategically injects diverse hints at optimal points within reasoning paths.<n>CoRT significantly enhances efficiency, reducing token usage by approximately 30% for the 32B model and 50% for the 1.5B model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T08:41:44Z)
• Large Language Model enabled Mathematical Modeling [2.132096006921049]
  This research investigates the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to bridge the formulation gap using natural language understanding and code generation.<n>DeepSeek-R1 is a cost-efficient and high-performing model trained with reinforcement learning.<n>Our methodology includes baseline assessments, the development of a hallucination taxonomy, and the application of mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T17:41:42Z)
• Fine-Tuning LLMs to Analyze Multiple Dimensions of Code Review: A Maximum Entropy Regulated Long Chain-of-Thought Approach [8.438786414509178]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in supporting automated code review.<n>Recent research has demonstrated significantly improved performance through fine-tuning LLMs with code review data.<n>This paper contributes MelcotCR, a chain-of-thought (COT) fine-tuning approach that trains LLMs with an impressive reasoning ability to analyze multiple dimensions of code review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T13:51:56Z)
• When Punctuation Matters: A Large-Scale Comparison of Prompt Robustness Methods for LLMs [55.20230501807337]
  We present the first systematic evaluation of 5 methods for improving prompt robustness within a unified experimental framework.<n>We benchmark these techniques on 8 models from Llama, Qwen and Gemma families across 52 tasks from Natural Instructions dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T10:32:50Z)
• Teaching LLM to Reason: Reinforcement Learning from Algorithmic Problems without Code [76.80306464249217]
  We propose TeaR, which aims at teaching LLMs to reason better.<n>TeaR leverages careful data curation and reinforcement learning to guide models in discovering optimal reasoning paths through code-related tasks.<n>We conduct extensive experiments using two base models and three long-CoT distillation models, with model sizes ranging from 1.5 billion to 32 billion parameters, and across 17 benchmarks spanning Math, Knowledge, Code, and Logical Reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:34:05Z)
• Aligning Frozen LLMs by Reinforcement Learning: An Iterative Reweight-then-Optimize Approach [65.6966065843227]
  Iterative Reweight-then-IRO is a framework that performs RL-style alignment of a frozen base model without touching its parameters.<n>At test time, the value functions are used to guide the base model generation via a search-based optimization process.<n> Notably, users can apply IRO to align a model on their own dataset, similar to OpenAI's reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T21:49:02Z)
• HeuriGym: An Agentic Benchmark for LLM-Crafted Heuristics in Combinatorial Optimization [31.908590128913094]
  HeuriGym is an agentic framework designed for evaluating algorithms generated by Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate nine state-of-the-art models on nine problems across domains such as computer systems, logistics, and biology, exposing persistent limitations in tool use, planning, and adaptive reasoning.<n>Our open-source benchmark aims to guide the development of LLMs toward more effective and realistic problem-solving in scientific and engineering domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T17:46:47Z)
• Value-Guided Search for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [49.971608979012366]
  We propose a simple and efficient method for value model training on long-context reasoning traces.<n>By collecting a dataset of 2.5 million reasoning traces, we train a 1.5B token-level value model.<n>We find that block-wise value-guided search (VGS) with a final weighted majority vote achieves better test-time scaling than standard methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T01:05:07Z)
• Activation-Guided Consensus Merging for Large Language Models [25.68958388022476]
  We present textbfActivation-Guided textbfConsensus textbfMerging (textbfACM), a plug-and-play merging framework that determines layer-specific merging coefficients.<n>Experiments on Long-to-Short (L2S) and general merging tasks demonstrate that ACM consistently outperforms all baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T07:04:01Z)
• Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z)
• Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Reasoning [80.55186052123196]
  We introduce Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD), a novel framework aimed at improving the efficiency of inference in large language models (LLMs)<n>RSD incorporates a controlled bias to prioritize high-reward outputs, in contrast to existing speculative decoding methods that enforce strict unbiasedness.<n>RSD delivers significant efficiency gains against decoding with the target model only, while achieving significant better accuracy than parallel decoding method on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T17:19:57Z)
• Reference Trustable Decoding: A Training-Free Augmentation Paradigm for Large Language Models [79.41139393080736]
  Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced and demonstrated impressive capabilities. In-Context Learning (ICL) and. Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) are currently two mainstream methods for augmenting. LLMs to downstream tasks. We propose Reference Trustable Decoding (RTD), a paradigm that allows models to quickly adapt to new tasks without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T10:48:20Z)
• A Deep Learning Method for Comparing Bayesian Hierarchical Models [1.6736940231069393]
  We propose a deep learning method for performing Bayesian model comparison on any set of hierarchical models. Our method enables efficient re-estimation of posterior model probabilities and fast performance validation prior to any real-data application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T17:27:07Z)
• Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Model-Based Actor-Critic [67.00475077281212]
  Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms are more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts. We propose a novel approach that achieves high sample efficiency without the strong reliance on accurate learned models. We show that CMBAC significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of sample efficiency on several challenging tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T15:33:11Z)
• Probabilistic Case-based Reasoning for Open-World Knowledge Graph Completion [59.549664231655726]
  A case-based reasoning (CBR) system solves a new problem by retrieving cases' that are similar to the given problem. In this paper, we demonstrate that such a system is achievable for reasoning in knowledge-bases (KBs) Our approach predicts attributes for an entity by gathering reasoning paths from similar entities in the KB.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T17:48:12Z)
• MM-KTD: Multiple Model Kalman Temporal Differences for Reinforcement Learning [36.14516028564416]
  This paper proposes an innovative Multiple Model Kalman Temporal Difference (MM-KTD) framework to learn optimal control policies. An active learning method is proposed to enhance the sampling efficiency of the system. Experimental results show superiority of the MM-KTD framework in comparison to its state-of-the-art counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-30T06:39:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.