Why Do More Experts Fail? A Theoretical Analysis of Model Merging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21226v2
• Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:43:50 GMT
• Title: Why Do More Experts Fail? A Theoretical Analysis of Model Merging
• Authors: Zijing Wang, Xingle Xu, Yongkang Liu, Yiqun Zhang, Peiqin Lin, Shi Feng, Xiaocui Yang, Daling Wang, Hinrich Schütze,
• Abstract summary: Model merging dramatically reduces storage and computational resources by combining multiple expert models into a single multi-task model.<n>Recent model merging methods have shown promising results, but struggle to maintain performance gains as the number of merged models increases.<n>We show that the limited effective parameter space imposes a strict constraint on the number of models that can be successfully merged.
• Score: 51.18155031364046
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model merging dramatically reduces storage and computational resources by combining multiple expert models into a single multi-task model. Although recent model merging methods have shown promising results, they struggle to maintain performance gains as the number of merged models increases. In this paper, we investigate the key obstacles that limit the scalability of model merging when integrating a large number of expert models. First, we prove that there is an upper bound on model merging. Further theoretical analysis reveals that the limited effective parameter space imposes a strict constraint on the number of models that can be successfully merged. Gaussian Width shows that the marginal benefit of merging additional models diminishes according to a strictly concave function. This implies that the effective parameter space becomes rapidly saturated as the number of merged models increases. Furthermore, using Approximate Kinematics Theory, we prove the existence of a unique optimal threshold beyond which adding more models does not yield significant performance improvements. At the same time, we introduce a straightforward Reparameterized Heavy-Tailed method (RHT) to extend the coverage of the merged model, thereby enhancing its performance. Empirical results on 12 benchmarks, including both knowledge-intensive and general-purpose tasks, validate our theoretical analysis. We believe that these results spark further research beyond the current scope of model merging. The source code is in the Github repository: https://github.com/wzj1718/ModelMergingAnalysis.

Related papers

• Multi-Level Collaboration in Model Merging [56.31088116526825]
  This paper explores the intrinsic connections between model merging and model ensembling.<n>We find that even when previous restrictions are not met, there is still a way for model merging to attain a near-identical and superior performance similar to that of ensembling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T07:45:04Z)
• Scalable Model Merging with Progressive Layer-wise Distillation [17.521794641817642]
  We introduce a novel few-shot merging algorithm, ProDistill (Progressive Layer-wise Distillation)<n>We show that ProDistill achieves state-of-the-art performance, with up to 6.14% and 6.61% improvements in vision and NLU tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T10:15:18Z)
• Exploring Model Kinship for Merging Large Language Models [52.01652098827454]
  We introduce model kinship, the degree of similarity or relatedness between Large Language Models. We find that there is a certain relationship between model kinship and the performance gains after model merging. We propose a new model merging strategy: Top-k Greedy Merging with Model Kinship, which can yield better performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T14:29:29Z)
• What Matters for Model Merging at Scale? [94.26607564817786]
  Model merging aims to combine multiple expert models into a more capable single model. Previous studies have primarily focused on merging a few small models. This study systematically evaluates the utility of model merging at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:17:19Z)
• EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Merging [55.03509900949149]
  We show that Elect, Mask & Rescale-Merging (EMR-Merging) shows outstanding performance compared to existing merging methods. EMR-Merging is tuning-free, thus requiring no data availability or any additional training while showing impressive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T05:25:45Z)
• Understanding Parameter Sharing in Transformers [53.75988363281843]
  Previous work on Transformers has focused on sharing parameters in different layers, which can improve the performance of models with limited parameters by increasing model depth. We show that the success of this approach can be largely attributed to better convergence, with only a small part due to the increased model complexity. Experiments on 8 machine translation tasks show that our model achieves competitive performance with only half the model complexity of parameter sharing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:48:59Z)
• LowFER: Low-rank Bilinear Pooling for Link Prediction [4.110108749051657]
  We propose a factorized bilinear pooling model, commonly used in multi-modal learning, for better fusion of entities and relations. Our model naturally generalizes decomposition Tucker based TuckER model, which has been shown to generalize other models. We evaluate on real-world datasets, reaching on par or state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-25T07:33:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.