Beyond Perception: Evaluating Abstract Visual Reasoning through Multi-Stage Task

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21850v2
• Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 05:35:04 GMT
• Title: Beyond Perception: Evaluating Abstract Visual Reasoning through Multi-Stage Task
• Authors: Yanbei Jiang, Yihao Ding, Chao Lei, Jiayang Ao, Jey Han Lau, Krista A. Ehinger,
• Abstract summary: Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in general visual reasoning but remain underexplored in abstract visual Reasoning (AVR)<n>Existing benchmarks focus on single-step reasoning, emphasizing the end result but neglecting the multi-stage nature of reasoning process.<n>We introduce MultiStAR, a Multi-Stage benchmark, designed to assess reasoning across varying levels of complexity.
• Score: 22.16139464288789
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in general visual reasoning but remain underexplored in Abstract Visual Reasoning (AVR), which demands higher-order reasoning to identify abstract rules beyond simple perception. Existing AVR benchmarks focus on single-step reasoning, emphasizing the end result but neglecting the multi-stage nature of reasoning process. Past studies found MLLMs struggle with these benchmarks, but it doesn't explain how they fail. To address this gap, we introduce MultiStAR, a Multi-Stage AVR benchmark, based on RAVEN, designed to assess reasoning across varying levels of complexity. Additionally, existing metrics like accuracy only focus on the final outcomes while do not account for the correctness of intermediate steps. Therefore, we propose a novel metric, MSEval, which considers the correctness of intermediate steps in addition to the final outcomes. We conduct comprehensive experiments on MultiStAR using 17 representative close-source and open-source MLLMs. The results reveal that while existing MLLMs perform adequately on basic perception tasks, they continue to face challenges in more complex rule detection stages.

Related papers

• MAS-ProVe: Understanding the Process Verification of Multi-Agent Systems [59.20800753428596]
  We present MAS-ProVe, a systematic empirical study of process verification for multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>Our study spans three verification paradigms (LLM-as-a-Judge, reward models, and process reward models)<n>We find that process-level verification does not consistently improve performance and frequently exhibits high variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T03:30:36Z)
• Advancing Adaptive Multi-Stage Video Anomaly Reasoning: A Benchmark Dataset and Method [96.63801368613177]
  We present a new task that elevates video anomaly analysis from descriptive understanding to structured, multi-stage reasoning.<n>We present a new dataset with 8,641 videos, totaling more than 50,000 samples, making it one of the largest datasets for video anomaly understanding.<n>Building upon the proposed task and dataset, we develop an end-to-end MLLM-based VAR model termed Vad-R1-Plus, which supports adaptive hierarchical reasoning and risk-aware decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T08:09:04Z)
• When Seeing Is not Enough: Revealing the Limits of Active Reasoning in MLLMs [29.198301196459834]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong capabilities across a broad range of benchmarks.<n>Most existing evaluations focus on passive inference, where models perform step-by-step reasoning under complete information.<n>This raises a fundamental question: Can MLLMs actively acquire missing evidence under incomplete information?<n>We require the MLLMs to actively acquire missing evidence and iteratively refine decisions under incomplete information, by selecting a target image from a candidate pool without task-specific priors.<n>We evaluate 20 superior MLLMs and find that performance on active reasoning lags far behind it on passive settings, indicating substantial room for
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T08:17:27Z)
• Advancing Multimodal Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models via Visual Perception Reward [87.06604760273372]
  We propose Perception-R1, which introduces a novel visual perception reward that explicitly encourages MLLMs to perceive the visual content accurately.<n>We show that Perception-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance on most benchmarks using only 1,442 training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T16:48:42Z)
• Vad-R1: Towards Video Anomaly Reasoning via Perception-to-Cognition Chain-of-Thought [58.321044666612174]
  Vad-R1 is an end-to-end MLLM-based framework for Video Anomaly Reasoning.<n>We design a Perception-to-Cognition Chain-of-Thought (P2C-CoT) that simulates the human process of recognizing anomalies.<n>We also propose an improved reinforcement learning algorithm AVA-GRPO, which explicitly incentivizes the anomaly reasoning capability of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:05:16Z)
• Grounded Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Large Language Models [66.04061083611863]
  We propose a new learning task for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) called Grounded Chain-of-Thought (GCoT)<n>GCoT is keen to helping MLLMs to recognize and ground the relevant visual cues step by step, thereby predicting the correct answer with grounding coordinates as the intuitive basis.<n>To facilitate this task, we also carefully design and construct a dataset called multimodal grounded chain-of-thought (MM-GCoT) consisting of 24,022 GCoT examples for 5,033 images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T04:07:47Z)
• VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z)
• Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Models [26.17300490736624]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are predominantly trained and tested on consistent visual-textual inputs.<n>We propose the Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning benchmark to assess MLLMs' ability to detect and reason about semantic mismatches.<n>We evaluate six state-of-the-art MLLMs, showing that models with dedicated multimodal reasoning capabilities, such as o1, substantially outperform their counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T01:52:37Z)
• Look Before You Decide: Prompting Active Deduction of MLLMs for Assumptive Reasoning [77.72128397088409]
  We show that most prevalent MLLMs can be easily fooled by the introduction of a presupposition into the question.<n>We also propose a novel reinforcement learning paradigm to encourage the model to actively perform composite deduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T15:53:27Z)
• MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark [41.68821233828375]
  This paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed MLLM-as-a-Judge, to assess the ability of MLLMs in assisting judges across diverse modalities. Our study reveals that, while MLLMs demonstrate remarkable human-like discernment in Pair Comparison, there is a significant divergence from human preferences in Scoring Evaluation and Batch Ranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T12:28:32Z)
• Misconfidence-based Demonstration Selection for LLM In-Context Learning [0.0]
  In-context learning with large language models (LLMs) excels at adapting to various tasks rapidly. Current approaches to this problem either rely on hard-to-acquire external supervision or require frequent interactions with LLMs. We propose a new method called In-Context Reflection (ICR) to overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T00:11:24Z)
• InfiMM-Eval: Complex Open-Ended Reasoning Evaluation For Multi-Modal Large Language Models [50.03163753638256]
  Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly prominent in the field of artificial intelligence. Our benchmark comprises three key reasoning categories: deductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning. We evaluate a selection of representative MLLMs using this rigorously developed open-ended multi-step elaborate reasoning benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T07:06:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.