Evaluation of Cultural Competence of Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22793v2
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:00:41 GMT
• Title: Evaluation of Cultural Competence of Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Srishti Yadav, Lauren Tilton, Maria Antoniak, Taylor Arnold, Jiaang Li, Siddhesh Milind Pawar, Antonia Karamolegkou, Stella Frank, Zhaochong An, Negar Rostamzadeh, Daniel Hershcovich, Serge Belongie, Ekaterina Shutova,
• Abstract summary: Modern vision-language models (VLMs) often fail at cultural competency evaluations and benchmarks.<n>This paper argues that foundational methodologies from visual culture studies are necessary for cultural analysis of images.
• Score: 25.953345583487312
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern vision-language models (VLMs) often fail at cultural competency evaluations and benchmarks. Given the diversity of applications built upon VLMs, there is renewed interest in understanding how they encode cultural nuances. While individual aspects of this problem have been studied, we still lack a comprehensive framework for systematically identifying and annotating the nuanced cultural dimensions present in images for VLMs. This position paper argues that foundational methodologies from visual culture studies (cultural studies, semiotics, and visual studies) are necessary for cultural analysis of images. Building upon this review, we propose a set of five frameworks, corresponding to cultural dimensions, that must be considered for a more complete analysis of the cultural competencies of VLMs.

Related papers

• Do Large Language Models Truly Understand Cross-cultural Differences? [53.481048019144644]
  We develop a scenario-based benchmark to evaluate large language models' cross-cultural understanding and reasoning.<n>Grounded in cultural theory, we categorize cross-cultural capabilities into nine dimensions.<n>The dataset supports continuous expansion, and experiments confirm its transferability to other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T01:21:58Z)
• BLEnD-Vis: Benchmarking Multimodal Cultural Understanding in Vision Language Models [54.16874020794336]
  We introduce BLEnD-Vis, a benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of everyday cultural knowledge in vision-language models (VLMs)<n> BLEnD-Vis constructs 313 culturally grounded question templates spanning 16 regions and generates three aligned multiple-choice formats.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 4,916 images and over 21,000 multiple-choice question (MCQ) instances, validated through human annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T09:10:05Z)
• CultureScope: A Dimensional Lens for Probing Cultural Understanding in LLMs [57.653830744706305]
  CultureScope is the most comprehensive evaluation framework to date for assessing cultural understanding in large language models.<n>Inspired by the cultural iceberg theory, we design a novel dimensional schema for cultural knowledge classification.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively evaluate cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T17:47:48Z)
• Toward Socially Aware Vision-Language Models: Evaluating Cultural Competence Through Multimodal Story Generation [2.0467354053171243]
  We present the first comprehensive evaluation of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) cultural competence through multimodal story generation.<n>Our analysis reveals significant cultural adaptation capabilities, with rich culturally-specific vocabulary spanning names, familial terms, and geographic markers.<n>We uncover concerning limitations: cultural competence varies dramatically across architectures, some models exhibit inverse cultural alignment, and automated metrics show architectural bias contradicting human assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T19:39:02Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias via Word Association Test [48.623761108859085]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To mitigate the culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach that integrates a culture-aware steering mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• RAVENEA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Visual Culture Understanding [79.44246283490665]
  We introduce RAVENEA, a new benchmark designed to advance visual culture understanding through retrieval.<n>RAVENEA focuses on two tasks: culture-focused visual question answering (cVQA) and culture-informed image captioning (cIC)<n>We train and evaluate seven multimodal retrievers for each image query, and measure the downstream impact of retrieval-augmented inputs across fourteen state-of-the-art vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T14:57:16Z)
• Cultural Learning-Based Culture Adaptation of Language Models [70.1063219524999]
  Adapting large language models (LLMs) to diverse cultural values is a challenging task.<n>We present CLCA, a novel framework for enhancing LLM alignment with cultural values based on cultural learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T18:16:26Z)
• CultureVLM: Characterizing and Improving Cultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models for over 100 Countries [63.00147630084146]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced human-AI interaction but struggle with cultural understanding.<n>CultureVerse is a large-scale multimodal benchmark covering 19, 682 cultural concepts, 188 countries/regions, 15 cultural concepts, and 3 question types.<n>We propose CultureVLM, a series of VLMs fine-tuned on our dataset to achieve significant performance improvement in cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T14:42:37Z)
• CROPE: Evaluating In-Context Adaptation of Vision and Language Models to Culture-Specific Concepts [45.77570690529597]
  We introduce CROPE, a visual question answering benchmark designed to probe the knowledge of culture-specific concepts.<n>Our evaluation of several state-of-the-art open Vision and Language models shows large performance disparities between culture-specific and common concepts.<n>Experiments with contextual knowledge indicate that models struggle to effectively utilize multimodal information and bind culture-specific concepts to their depictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T17:31:19Z)
• Benchmarking Vision Language Models for Cultural Understanding [31.898921287065242]
  This study introduces CulturalVQA, a visual question-answering benchmark aimed at assessing Vision Language Models (VLMs) We curate a collection of 2,378 image-question pairs with 1-5 answers per question representing cultures from 11 countries across 5 continents. The questions probe understanding of various facets of culture such as clothing, food, drinks, rituals, and traditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:21:41Z)
• From Local Concepts to Universals: Evaluating the Multicultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models [10.121734731147376]
  Vision-language models' performance remains suboptimal on images from non-western cultures. Various benchmarks have been proposed to test models' cultural inclusivity, but they have limited coverage of cultures. We introduce the GlobalRG benchmark, comprising two challenging tasks: retrieval across universals and cultural visual grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T23:28:28Z)
• Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Cultural Commonsense [98.09670425244462]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial commonsense understanding. This paper examines the capabilities and limitations of several state-of-the-art LLMs in the context of cultural commonsense tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T20:28:34Z)
• CDEval: A Benchmark for Measuring the Cultural Dimensions of Large Language Models [41.885600036131045]
  CDEval is a benchmark aimed at evaluating the cultural dimensions of Large Language Models. It is constructed by incorporating both GPT-4's automated generation and human verification, covering six cultural dimensions across seven domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T02:01:25Z)
• Navigating Cultural Chasms: Exploring and Unlocking the Cultural POV of Text-To-Image Models [32.99865895211158]
  We explore the cultural perception embedded in Text-To-Image (TTI) models by characterizing culture across three tiers. We propose a comprehensive suite of evaluation techniques, including intrinsic evaluations using the CLIP space. To bolster our research, we introduce the CulText2I dataset, derived from six diverse TTI models and spanning ten languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T10:13:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.