Primal-Dual Neural Algorithmic Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24067v1
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 23:20:07 GMT
• Title: Primal-Dual Neural Algorithmic Reasoning
• Authors: Yu He, Ellen Vitercik,
• Abstract summary: Neuralic Reasoning (NAR) trains neural networks to simulate classical algorithms, enabling structured and interpretable reasoning over Algorithm data.<n>We introduce a framework grounded in the primal-dual paradigm, a classical approximation algorithms.<n>Our results demonstrate that our model not only simulates but also outperforms approximation algorithms for multiple tasks.
• Score: 14.433843795079083
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (NAR) trains neural networks to simulate classical algorithms, enabling structured and interpretable reasoning over complex data. While prior research has predominantly focused on learning exact algorithms for polynomial-time-solvable problems, extending NAR to harder problems remains an open challenge. In this work, we introduce a general NAR framework grounded in the primal-dual paradigm, a classical method for designing efficient approximation algorithms. By leveraging a bipartite representation between primal and dual variables, we establish an alignment between primal-dual algorithms and Graph Neural Networks. Furthermore, we incorporate optimal solutions from small instances to greatly enhance the model's reasoning capabilities. Our empirical results demonstrate that our model not only simulates but also outperforms approximation algorithms for multiple tasks, exhibiting robust generalization to larger and out-of-distribution graphs. Moreover, we highlight the framework's practical utility by integrating it with commercial solvers and applying it to real-world datasets.

Related papers

• Decision-focused Graph Neural Networks for Combinatorial Optimization [62.34623670845006]
  An emerging strategy to tackle optimization problems involves the adoption of graph neural networks (GNNs) as an alternative to traditional algorithms. Despite the growing popularity of GNNs and traditional algorithm solvers in the realm of CO, there is limited research on their integrated use and the correlation between them within an end-to-end framework. We introduce a decision-focused framework that utilizes GNNs to address CO problems with auxiliary support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T22:52:27Z)
• Reasoning Algorithmically in Graph Neural Networks [1.8130068086063336]
  We aim to integrate the structured and rule-based reasoning of algorithms with adaptive learning capabilities of neural networks. This dissertation provides theoretical and practical contributions to this area of research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T12:16:51Z)
• Discrete Neural Algorithmic Reasoning [18.497863598167257]
  We propose to force neural reasoners to maintain the execution trajectory as a combination of finite predefined states. trained with supervision on the algorithm's state transitions, such models are able to perfectly align with the original algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T16:03:04Z)
• Efficient Model-Free Exploration in Low-Rank MDPs [76.87340323826945]
  Low-Rank Markov Decision Processes offer a simple, yet expressive framework for RL with function approximation. Existing algorithms are either (1) computationally intractable, or (2) reliant upon restrictive statistical assumptions. We propose the first provably sample-efficient algorithm for exploration in Low-Rank MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T15:41:48Z)
• Neural Algorithmic Reasoning Without Intermediate Supervision [21.852775399735005]
  We focus on learning neural algorithmic reasoning only from the input-output pairs without appealing to the intermediate supervision. We build a self-supervised objective that can regularise intermediate computations of the model without access to the algorithm trajectory. We demonstrate that our approach is competitive to its trajectory-supervised counterpart on tasks from the CLRSic Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T09:57:44Z)
• Neural Algorithmic Reasoning for Combinatorial Optimisation [20.36694807847833]
  We propose leveraging recent advancements in neural reasoning to improve the learning of CO problems. We suggest pre-training our neural model on relevant algorithms before training it on CO instances. Our results demonstrate that by using this learning setup, we achieve superior performance compared to non-algorithmically informed deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T13:59:02Z)
• Representation Learning with Multi-Step Inverse Kinematics: An Efficient and Optimal Approach to Rich-Observation RL [106.82295532402335]
  Existing reinforcement learning algorithms suffer from computational intractability, strong statistical assumptions, and suboptimal sample complexity. We provide the first computationally efficient algorithm that attains rate-optimal sample complexity with respect to the desired accuracy level. Our algorithm, MusIK, combines systematic exploration with representation learning based on multi-step inverse kinematics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T14:51:47Z)
• Neural Improvement Heuristics for Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems [49.85111302670361]
  We introduce a novel Neural Improvement (NI) model capable of handling graph-based problems where information is encoded in the nodes, edges, or both. The presented model serves as a fundamental component for hill-climbing-based algorithms that guide the selection of neighborhood operations for each.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T10:35:29Z)
• Neural Combinatorial Optimization: a New Player in the Field [69.23334811890919]
  This paper presents a critical analysis on the incorporation of algorithms based on neural networks into the classical optimization framework. A comprehensive study is carried out to analyse the fundamental aspects of such algorithms, including performance, transferability, computational cost and to larger-sized instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T07:54:56Z)
• Fractal Structure and Generalization Properties of Stochastic Optimization Algorithms [71.62575565990502]
  We prove that the generalization error of an optimization algorithm can be bounded on the complexity' of the fractal structure that underlies its generalization measure. We further specialize our results to specific problems (e.g., linear/logistic regression, one hidden/layered neural networks) and algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T08:05:36Z)
• Iterative Algorithm Induced Deep-Unfolding Neural Networks: Precoding Design for Multiuser MIMO Systems [59.804810122136345]
  We propose a framework for deep-unfolding, where a general form of iterative algorithm induced deep-unfolding neural network (IAIDNN) is developed. An efficient IAIDNN based on the structure of the classic weighted minimum mean-square error (WMMSE) iterative algorithm is developed. We show that the proposed IAIDNN efficiently achieves the performance of the iterative WMMSE algorithm with reduced computational complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T02:57:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.