MMAFFBen: A Multilingual and Multimodal Affective Analysis Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and VLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24423v1
• Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 10:02:15 GMT
• Title: MMAFFBen: A Multilingual and Multimodal Affective Analysis Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and VLMs
• Authors: Zhiwei Liu, Lingfei Qian, Qianqian Xie, Jimin Huang, Kailai Yang, Sophia Ananiadou,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MMAFFBen, the first extensive open-source benchmark for multilingual multimodal affective analysis.<n>MMAFFBen covers four key affective analysis tasks: sentiment polarity, sentiment intensity, emotion classification, and emotion intensity.<n>We construct the MMAFFIn dataset for fine-tuning LMs on affective analysis tasks, and further develop MMAFFLM-3b and MMAFFLM-7b based on it.
• Score: 33.73249122449025
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models and vision-language models (which we jointly call LMs) have transformed NLP and CV, demonstrating remarkable potential across various fields. However, their capabilities in affective analysis (i.e. sentiment analysis and emotion detection) remain underexplored. This gap is largely due to the absence of comprehensive evaluation benchmarks, and the inherent complexity of affective analysis tasks. In this paper, we introduce MMAFFBen, the first extensive open-source benchmark for multilingual multimodal affective analysis. MMAFFBen encompasses text, image, and video modalities across 35 languages, covering four key affective analysis tasks: sentiment polarity, sentiment intensity, emotion classification, and emotion intensity. Moreover, we construct the MMAFFIn dataset for fine-tuning LMs on affective analysis tasks, and further develop MMAFFLM-3b and MMAFFLM-7b based on it. We evaluate various representative LMs, including GPT-4o-mini, providing a systematic comparison of their affective understanding capabilities. This project is available at https://github.com/lzw108/MMAFFBen.

Related papers

• VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language Models [121.03333569013148]
  We introduce VisuLogic: a benchmark of 1,000 human-verified problems across six categories.<n>These types of questions can be evaluated to assess the visual reasoning capabilities of MLLMs from multiple perspectives.<n>Most models score below 30% accuracy-only slightly above the 25% random baseline and far below the 51.4% achieved by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:59:53Z)
• VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z)
• BRIGHTER: BRIdging the Gap in Human-Annotated Textual Emotion Recognition Datasets for 28 Languages [93.92804151830744]
  We present BRIGHTER, a collection of multi-labeled, emotion-annotated datasets in 28 different languages.<n>We highlight the challenges related to the data collection and annotation processes.<n>We show that the BRIGHTER datasets represent a meaningful step towards addressing the gap in text-based emotion recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T15:39:50Z)
• MEMO-Bench: A Multiple Benchmark for Text-to-Image and Multimodal Large Language Models on Human Emotion Analysis [53.012111671763776]
  This study introduces MEMO-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark consisting of 7,145 portraits, each depicting one of six different emotions. Results demonstrate that existing T2I models are more effective at generating positive emotions than negative ones. Although MLLMs show a certain degree of effectiveness in distinguishing and recognizing human emotions, they fall short of human-level accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T02:09:48Z)
• Do Large Language Models Possess Sensitive to Sentiment? [18.88126980975737]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently displayed their extraordinary capabilities in language understanding.<n>This paper investigates the ability of LLMs to detect and react to sentiment in text modal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T01:40:20Z)
• Large Language Models Meet Text-Centric Multimodal Sentiment Analysis: A Survey [66.166184609616]
  ChatGPT has opened up immense potential for applying large language models (LLMs) to text-centric multimodal tasks. It is still unclear how existing LLMs can adapt better to text-centric multimodal sentiment analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T10:36:27Z)
• Evaluation of data inconsistency for multi-modal sentiment analysis [20.332527596452625]
  Emotion semantic inconsistency is an ubiquitous challenge in multi-modal sentiment analysis. Our research presents a new challenge and offer valuable insights for the future development of sentiment analysis systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T07:11:56Z)
• EmoLLMs: A Series of Emotional Large Language Models and Annotation Tools for Comprehensive Affective Analysis [33.0280076936761]
  We propose EmoLLMs, the first series of open-sourced instruction-following LLMs for affective analysis based on fine-tuning various LLMs with instruction data. EmoLLMs achieve the ChatGPT-level and GPT-4-level generalization capabilities on affective analysis tasks, and demonstrates our models can be used as affective annotation tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T17:11:11Z)
• WisdoM: Improving Multimodal Sentiment Analysis by Fusing Contextual World Knowledge [73.76722241704488]
  We propose a plug-in framework named WisdoM to leverage the contextual world knowledge induced from the large vision-language models (LVLMs) for enhanced multimodal sentiment analysis. We show that our approach has substantial improvements over several state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T16:08:07Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.