Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00886v1
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 07:52:16 GMT
- Title: Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers
- Authors: Hongru Wang, Cheng Qian, Manling Li, Jiahao Qiu, Boyang Xue, Mengdi Wang, Heng Ji, Kam-Fai Wong,
- Abstract summary: We argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently.<n>We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction.<n>This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
- Score: 89.26889709510242
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into increasingly autonomous agents, fundamental questions about their epistemic foundations remain unresolved: What defines an agent? How should it make decisions? And what objectives should guide its behavior? In this position paper, we argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently. We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction. Building on this framework, we advocate for aligning an agent's tool use decision-making boundary with its knowledge boundary, thereby minimizing unnecessary tool use and maximizing epistemic efficiency. This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
Related papers
- The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z) - Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z) - Towards Responsible and Explainable AI Agents with Consensus-Driven Reasoning [4.226647687395254]
This paper presents a Responsible(RAI) and Explainable(XAI) AI Agent Architecture for production-grade agentic based on multi-model consensus and reasoning-layer governance.<n>In the proposed design, a consortium of heterogeneous LLM and VLM agents independently generates candidate outputs from a shared input context.<n>A dedicated reasoning agent then performs structured consolidation across these outputs, enforcing safety and policy constraints, mitigating hallucinations and bias, and producing auditable, evidence-backed decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-25T14:49:25Z) - Agent-centric learning: from external reward maximization to internal knowledge curation [0.0]
We propose representational empowerment, a new perspective towards a truly agent-centric learning paradigm.<n>This objective measures an agent's ability to controllably maintain and diversify its own knowledge structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-29T22:09:35Z) - Levels of Autonomy for AI Agents [9.324309359500198]
We argue that an agent's level of autonomy can be treated as a deliberate design decision, separate from its capability and operational environment.<n>We define five levels of escalating agent autonomy, characterized by the roles a user can take when interacting with an agent.<n>We highlight a potential application of our framework towards AI autonomy certificates to govern agent behavior in single- and multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-14T12:14:36Z) - Agentic Knowledgeable Self-awareness [79.25908923383776]
KnowSelf is a data-centric approach that applies agents with knowledgeable self-awareness like humans.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that KnowSelf can outperform various strong baselines on different tasks and models with minimal use of external knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-04T16:03:38Z) - Don't lie to your friends: Learning what you know from collaborative self-play [90.35507959579331]
We propose a radically new approach to teaching AI agents what they know.<n>We construct multi-agent collaborations in which the group is rewarded for collectively arriving at correct answers.<n>The desired meta-knowledge emerges from the incentives built into the structure of the interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-18T17:53:20Z) - Agency Is Frame-Dependent [94.91580596320331]
Agency is a system's capacity to steer outcomes toward a goal.<n>We argue that agency is fundamentally frame-dependent.<n>We conclude that any basic science of agency requires frame-dependence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T08:34:57Z) - Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL)
This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z) - ToM2C: Target-oriented Multi-agent Communication and Cooperation with
Theory of Mind [18.85252946546942]
Theory of Mind (ToM) builds socially intelligent agents who are able to communicate and cooperate effectively.
We demonstrate the idea in two typical target-oriented multi-agent tasks: cooperative navigation and multi-sensor target coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-15T18:29:55Z) - Automated Machine Learning, Bounded Rationality, and Rational
Metareasoning [62.997667081978825]
We will look at automated machine learning (AutoML) and related problems from the perspective of bounded rationality.
Taking actions under bounded resources requires an agent to reflect on how to use these resources in an optimal way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-10T09:10:20Z) - Building Affordance Relations for Robotic Agents - A Review [7.50722199393581]
Affordances describe the possibilities for an agent to perform actions with an object.
We review and find common ground amongst different strategies that use the concept of affordances within robotic tasks.
We identify and discuss a range of interesting research directions involving affordances that have the potential to improve the capabilities of an AI agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-14T08:35:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.