Is Perturbation-Based Image Protection Disruptive to Image Editing?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04394v2
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:45:40 GMT
• Title: Is Perturbation-Based Image Protection Disruptive to Image Editing?
• Abstract summary: Current image protection methods rely on adding imperceptible perturbations to images to obstruct diffusion-based editing.<n>A fully successful protection for an image implies that the output of editing attempts is an undesirable, noisy image.<n>We argue that perturbation-based methods may not provide a sufficient solution for robust image protection against diffusion-based editing.
• Score: 4.234664611250363
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The remarkable image generation capabilities of state-of-the-art diffusion models, such as Stable Diffusion, can also be misused to spread misinformation and plagiarize copyrighted materials. To mitigate the potential risks associated with image editing, current image protection methods rely on adding imperceptible perturbations to images to obstruct diffusion-based editing. A fully successful protection for an image implies that the output of editing attempts is an undesirable, noisy image which is completely unrelated to the reference image. In our experiments with various perturbation-based image protection methods across multiple domains (natural scene images and artworks) and editing tasks (image-to-image generation and style editing), we discover that such protection does not achieve this goal completely. In most scenarios, diffusion-based editing of protected images generates a desirable output image which adheres precisely to the guidance prompt. Our findings suggest that adding noise to images may paradoxically increase their association with given text prompts during the generation process, leading to unintended consequences such as better resultant edits. Hence, we argue that perturbation-based methods may not provide a sufficient solution for robust image protection against diffusion-based editing.

Related papers

• MIRAGE: Protecting against Malicious Image Editing via False Moderation [73.0838743416626]
  Prior work on image immunization adds imperceptible perturbations to an image to protect against unauthorized manipulations.<n>We take a system-level view of the problem and identify a previously unexplored attack surface common to all major commercial image editing systems.<n>We propose to immunize images by causing these moderations to flag images as policy-violating, triggering an automatic refusal regardless of the editing prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T16:23:10Z)
• Purify Once, Edit Freely: Breaking Image Protections under Model Mismatch [21.826849937304477]
  Diffusion models enable high-fidelity image editing but can also be misused for unauthorized style imitation and harmful content generation.<n>To mitigate these risks, proactive image protection methods embed small, often imperceptible adversarial perturbations into images before sharing to disrupt downstream editing or fine-tuning.<n>We introduce a unified post-release purification framework to evaluate protection survivability under model mismatch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T14:36:46Z)
• Editing Away the Evidence: Diffusion-Based Image Manipulation and the Failure Modes of Robust Watermarking [0.3644540605358075]
  diffusion-based image editing injects noise and reconstructs images through a powerful generative prior.<n>We show that non-adversarial diffusion editing can unintentionally degrade or remove robust watermarks.<n>Results indicate that even routine semantic edits can significantly reduce watermark recoverability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T12:46:27Z)
• ProEdit: Inversion-based Editing From Prompts Done Right [63.554692704101]
  Inversion-based visual editing provides an effective and training-free way to edit an image or a video based on user instructions.<n>Existing methods typically inject source image information during the sampling process to maintain editing consistency.<n>We propose ProEdit to address this issue both in the attention and the latent aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-26T18:59:14Z)
• Towards Transferable Defense Against Malicious Image Edits [70.17363183107604]
  Transferable Defense Against Malicious Image Edits (TDAE) is a novel bimodal framework that enhances image immunity against malicious edits.<n>We introduce FlatGrad Defense Mechanism (FDM), which incorporates gradient regularization into the adversarial objective.<n>For textual enhancement protection, we propose Dynamic Prompt Defense (DPD), which periodically refines text embeddings to align the editing outcomes of immunized images with those of the original images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T12:10:16Z)
• GuardDoor: Safeguarding Against Malicious Diffusion Editing via Protective Backdoors [8.261182037130407]
  GuardDoor is a novel and robust protection mechanism that fosters collaboration between image owners and model providers.<n>Our method demonstrates enhanced robustness against image preprocessing operations and is scalable for large-scale deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T22:21:44Z)
• Lost in Edits? A $λ$-Compass for AIGC Provenance [119.95562081325552]
  We propose a novel latent-space attribution method that robustly identifies and differentiates authentic outputs from manipulated ones.<n>LambdaTracer is effective across diverse iterative editing processes, whether automated through text-guided editing tools such as InstructPix2Pix or performed manually with editing software such as Adobe Photoshop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T06:24:25Z)
• Enhancing Text-to-Image Editing via Hybrid Mask-Informed Fusion [61.42732844499658]
  This paper systematically improves the text-guided image editing techniques based on diffusion models. We incorporate human annotation as an external knowledge to confine editing within a Mask-informed'' region.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T07:53:59Z)
• EditGuard: Versatile Image Watermarking for Tamper Localization and Copyright Protection [19.140822655858873]
  We propose a proactive forensics framework EditGuard to unify copyright protection and tamper-agnostic localization. It can offer a meticulous embedding of imperceptible watermarks and precise decoding of tampered areas and copyright information. Our experiments demonstrate that EditGuard balances the tamper localization accuracy, copyright recovery precision, and generalizability to various AIGC-based tampering methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T15:41:24Z)
• EditShield: Protecting Unauthorized Image Editing by Instruction-guided Diffusion Models [26.846110318670934]
  We propose a protection method EditShield against unauthorized modifications from text-to-image diffusion models. Specifically, EditShield works by adding imperceptible perturbations that can shift the latent representation used in the diffusion process. Our experiments demonstrate EditShield's effectiveness among synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T06:00:56Z)
• IMPRESS: Evaluating the Resilience of Imperceptible Perturbations Against Unauthorized Data Usage in Diffusion-Based Generative AI [52.90082445349903]
  Diffusion-based image generation models can create artistic images that mimic the style of an artist or maliciously edit the original images for fake content. Several attempts have been made to protect the original images from such unauthorized data usage by adding imperceptible perturbations. In this work, we introduce a purification perturbation platform, named IMPRESS, to evaluate the effectiveness of imperceptible perturbations as a protective measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T03:33:41Z)
• iEdit: Localised Text-guided Image Editing with Weak Supervision [53.082196061014734]
  We propose a novel learning method for text-guided image editing. It generates images conditioned on a source image and a textual edit prompt. It shows favourable results against its counterparts in terms of image fidelity, CLIP alignment score and qualitatively for editing both generated and real images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T07:39:14Z)
• JPEG Compressed Images Can Bypass Protections Against AI Editing [48.340067730457584]
  Imperceptible perturbations have been proposed as a means of protecting images from malicious editing. We find that the aforementioned perturbations are not robust to JPEG compression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T05:30:09Z)
• DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance [64.555930158319]
  DiffEdit is a method to take advantage of text-conditioned diffusion models for the task of semantic image editing. Our main contribution is able to automatically generate a mask highlighting regions of the input image that need to be edited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T17:16:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.