Truth in the Few: High-Value Data Selection for Efficient Multi-Modal Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04755v1
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:40:24 GMT
- Title: Truth in the Few: High-Value Data Selection for Efficient Multi-Modal Reasoning
- Authors: Shenshen Li, Kaiyuan Deng, Lei Wang, Hao Yang, Chong Peng, Peng Yan, Fumin Shen, Heng Tao Shen, Xing Xu,
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel data selection paradigm termed Activation Reasoning Potential (RAP)<n>RAP identifies cognitive samples by estimating each sample's potential to stimulate genuine multi-modal reasoning.<n>Our RAP method consistently achieves superior performance using only 9.3% of the training data, while reducing computational costs by over 43%.
- Score: 71.3533541927459
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress in complex reasoning tasks via reinforcement learning, it is commonly believed that extensive training data is necessary for improving multi-modal reasoning ability, inevitably leading to data redundancy and substantial computational costs. However, can smaller high-value datasets match or outperform full corpora for multi-modal reasoning in MLLMs? In this work, we challenge this assumption through a key observation: meaningful multi-modal reasoning is triggered by only a sparse subset of training samples, termed cognitive samples, whereas the majority contribute marginally. Building on this insight, we propose a novel data selection paradigm termed Reasoning Activation Potential (RAP), which identifies cognitive samples by estimating each sample's potential to stimulate genuine multi-modal reasoning by two complementary estimators: 1) Causal Discrepancy Estimator (CDE) based on the potential outcome model principle, eliminates samples that overly rely on language priors by comparing outputs between multi-modal and text-only inputs; 2) Attention Confidence Estimator (ACE), which exploits token-level self-attention to discard samples dominated by irrelevant but over-emphasized tokens in intermediate reasoning stages. Moreover, we introduce a Difficulty-aware Replacement Module (DRM) to substitute trivial instances with cognitively challenging ones, thereby ensuring complexity for robust multi-modal reasoning. Experiments on six datasets show that our RAP method consistently achieves superior performance using only 9.3% of the training data, while reducing computational costs by over 43%. Our code is available at https://github.com/Leo-ssl/RAP.
Related papers
- Infi-MMR: Curriculum-based Unlocking Multimodal Reasoning via Phased Reinforcement Learning in Multimodal Small Language Models [45.15161506154318]
Infi-MMR is a framework to systematically unlock the reasoning potential of Multimodal Small Language Models.<n>The first phase, Foundational Reasoning Activation, leverages high-quality textual reasoning datasets to activate and strengthen the model's logical reasoning capabilities.<n>The second phase, Cross-Modal Reasoning Adaptation, utilizes caption-augmented multimodal data to facilitate the progressive transfer of reasoning skills to multimodal contexts.<n>The third phase, Multimodal Reasoning Enhancement, employs curated, caption-free multimodal data to mitigate linguistic biases and promote robust cross-modal reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T04:51:56Z) - Unlocking the Potential of Difficulty Prior in RL-based Multimodal Reasoning [69.64809103333839]
We investigate how explicitly modeling problem's difficulty prior information shapes the effectiveness of reinforcement learning based fine-tuning for multimodal reasoning.<n>Our approach demonstrates significant performances across various multi-modal mathematical reasoning benchmarks with only 2K+0.6K two-stage training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T15:43:10Z) - Fractured Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [61.647243580650446]
We introduce Fractured Sampling, a unified inference-time strategy that interpolates between full CoT and solution-only sampling.<n>We show that Fractured Sampling consistently achieves superior accuracy-cost trade-offs, yielding steep log-linear scaling gains in Pass@k versus token budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T11:30:41Z) - Observe-R1: Unlocking Reasoning Abilities of MLLMs with Dynamic Progressive Reinforcement Learning [3.364797975300393]
We present Observe-R1, a novel framework aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs)<n>We construct the NeuraLadder dataset, which is organized and sampled according to the difficulty and complexity of data samples for RL training.<n>Experiments with the Qwen2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-VL-7B models on 20k samples from the NeuraLadder dataset show that Observe-R1 outperforms a series of larger reasoning models on both reasoning and general benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T14:08:03Z) - The Devil Is in the Details: Tackling Unimodal Spurious Correlations for Generalizable Multimodal Reward Models [31.81567038783558]
Multimodal Reward Models (MM-RMs) are crucial for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences.<n> MM-RMs often struggle to generalize to out-of-distribution data due to their reliance on unimodal spurious correlations.<n>We introduce a Shortcut-aware MM-RM learning algorithm that mitigates this issue by dynamically reweighting training samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T02:37:41Z) - Self-Training Elicits Concise Reasoning in Large Language Models [23.475414693530965]
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has enabled large language models (LLMs) to utilize additional computation through intermediate tokens.<n>We propose simple fine-tuning methods which leverage self-generated concise reasoning paths.<n>Our method achieves a 30% reduction in output tokens, across five model families on GSM8K and MATH, while maintaining average accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T14:14:50Z) - MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale [66.73529246309033]
multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant potential in a broad range of multimodal tasks.<n>Existing instruction-tuning datasets only provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.<n>We introduce a scalable and cost-effective method to construct a large-scale multimodal instruction-tuning dataset with rich intermediate rationales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T18:14:24Z) - Insight-V: Exploring Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Models [64.1799100754406]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate enhanced capabilities and reliability by reasoning more.<n>Despite various efforts to improve LLM reasoning, high-quality long-chain reasoning data and optimized training pipelines still remain inadequately explored in vision-language tasks.<n>We present Insight-V, an early effort to 1) scalably produce long and robust reasoning data for complex multi-modal tasks, and 2) an effective training pipeline to enhance the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T18:59:55Z) - Correlation Information Bottleneck: Towards Adapting Pretrained
Multimodal Models for Robust Visual Question Answering [63.87200781247364]
Correlation Information Bottleneck (CIB) seeks a tradeoff between compression and redundancy in representations.
We derive a tight theoretical upper bound for the mutual information between multimodal inputs and representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-14T22:04:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.