Canonical Autoregressive Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06446v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 18:09:10 GMT
• Title: Canonical Autoregressive Generation
• Authors: Ivi Chatzi, Nina Corvelo Benz, Stratis Tsirtsis, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez,
• Abstract summary: We show that large language models do not always generate canonical token sequences.<n>We introduce canonical sampling, a simple and efficient sampling method that precludes a given model from generating non-canonical token sequences.
• Score: 17.065618029171766
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: State of the art large language models are trained using large amounts of tokens derived from raw text using what is called a tokenizer. Crucially, the tokenizer determines the (token) vocabulary a model will use during inference as well as, in principle, the (token) language. This is because, while the token vocabulary may allow for different tokenizations of a string, the tokenizer always maps the string to only one of these tokenizations--the canonical tokenization. However, multiple lines of empirical evidence suggest that large language models do not always generate canonical token sequences, and this comes with several negative consequences. In this work, we first show that, to generate a canonical token sequence, a model needs to generate (partial) canonical token sequences at each step of the autoregressive generation process underpinning its functioning. Building upon this theoretical result, we introduce canonical sampling, a simple and efficient sampling method that precludes a given model from generating non-canonical token sequences. Further, we also show that, in comparison with standard sampling, the distribution of token sequences generated using canonical sampling is provably closer to the true distribution of token sequences used during training.

Related papers

• Broken Tokens? Your Language Model can Secretly Handle Non-Canonical Tokenizations [83.93566096400723]
  We find that instruction-tuned models retain up to 93.4% of their original performance when given a randomly sampled tokenization.<n>Character-level segmentation improves string manipulation and code understanding tasks by up to +14%.<n>Right-aligned digit grouping enhances large-number arithmetic by +33%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T18:02:26Z)
• Sampling from Your Language Model One Byte at a Time [82.71473348639489]
  Tokenization can introduce distortion into the model's generations, known as the Prompt Boundary Problem (PBP)<n>We present an inference-time method to convert any autore LM with a BPE tokenizer into a character-level or byte-level LM.<n>Our method efficiently solves the PBP and is also able to unify the vocabularies of language models with different tokenizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T02:37:04Z)
• Language Models over Canonical Byte-Pair Encodings [56.09166157337198]
  We propose methods to enforce canonicality in token-level language models.<n>We show that fixing canonicality mistakes improves the likelihood of held-out data for several models and corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T17:26:14Z)
• Causal Estimation of Tokenisation Bias [58.20086589761273]
  We quantify the effect of including or not a subword in a tokeniser's vocabulary on the probability a trained model assigns to the corresponding characters.<n>We find that tokenisation consistently affects models' outputs across scales, vocabularies, and tokenisers.<n> Notably, a subword's presence in a small model's vocabulary may increase its characters' probability by up to 17 times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T17:59:47Z)
• Bridging Continuous and Discrete Tokens for Autoregressive Visual Generation [63.89280381800457]
  We propose TokenBridge, which maintains the strong representation capacity of continuous tokens while preserving the modeling simplicity of discrete tokens.<n>We introduce a dimension-wise quantization strategy that independently discretizes each feature dimension, paired with a lightweight autoregressive prediction mechanism.<n>Our approach achieves reconstruction and generation quality on par with continuous methods while using standard categorical prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T17:59:59Z)
• Tokenization as Finite-State Transduction [24.19959327497118]
  We introduce a finite-state framework which can efficiently encode all possible tokenizations of a regular language. We show that Byte-Pair. Match (BPE) and MaxPiece (WordPiece) fit within this framework. An application of this is to guided generation, where the outputs of a language model are constrained to match some pattern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:10:07Z)
• Team Ryu's Submission to SIGMORPHON 2024 Shared Task on Subword Tokenization [3.0023392750520883]
  My submission explores whether morphological segmentation methods can be used as a part of subword tokenizers. The prediction results show that morphological segmentation could be as effective as commonly used subword tokenizers. A tokenizer with a balanced token frequency distribution tends to work better.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T04:06:09Z)
• The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
  Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline.<n>Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood.<n>The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Tokenization Bias in Language Models [6.418593476658017]
  State-of-the-art language models are autoregressive and operate on subword units known as tokens. We show that popular encoding schemes induce a sampling bias that cannot be mitigated with more training or data. We propose a novel algorithm to obtain unbiased estimates from any language model trained on tokenized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:38:02Z)
• Compositional Generalization without Trees using Multiset Tagging and Latent Permutations [121.37328648951993]
  We phrase semantic parsing as a two-step process: we first tag each input token with a multiset of output tokens. Then we arrange the tokens into an output sequence using a new way of parameterizing and predicting permutations. Our model outperforms pretrained seq2seq models and prior work on realistic semantic parsing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:09:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.