Advancing Question Generation with Joint Narrative and Difficulty Control
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06812v1
- Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 14:26:11 GMT
- Title: Advancing Question Generation with Joint Narrative and Difficulty Control
- Authors: Bernardo Leite, Henrique Lopes Cardoso,
- Abstract summary: We propose a strategy for Joint Narrative and Difficulty Control, enabling simultaneous control over these two attributes in the generation of reading comprehension questions.<n>Our evaluation provides preliminary evidence that this approach is feasible, though it is not effective across all instances.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Question Generation (QG), the task of automatically generating questions from a source input, has seen significant progress in recent years. Difficulty-controllable QG (DCQG) enables control over the difficulty level of generated questions while considering the learner's ability. Additionally, narrative-controllable QG (NCQG) allows control over the narrative aspects embedded in the questions. However, research in QG lacks a focus on combining these two types of control, which is important for generating questions tailored to educational purposes. To address this gap, we propose a strategy for Joint Narrative and Difficulty Control, enabling simultaneous control over these two attributes in the generation of reading comprehension questions. Our evaluation provides preliminary evidence that this approach is feasible, though it is not effective across all instances. Our findings highlight the conditions under which the strategy performs well and discuss the trade-offs associated with its application.
Related papers
- Towards Better Question Generation in QA-based Event Extraction [3.699715556687871]
Event Extraction (EE) aims to extract event-related information from unstructured texts.
The quality of the questions dramatically affects the extraction accuracy.
We propose a reinforcement learning method, RLQG, for QA-based EE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T03:52:01Z) - DuetRAG: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation [57.440772556318926]
Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework, DuetRAG, proposed.
bootstrapping philosophy is to simultaneously integrate the domain fintuning and RAG models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-12T09:48:28Z) - On Few-Shot Prompting for Controllable Question-Answer Generation in Narrative Comprehension [0.0]
We propose a few-shot prompting strategy for controlling the generation of question-answer pairs from children's narrative texts.
We show the effectiveness of controlling the generation process by employing few-shot prompting side by side with a reference model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T15:17:21Z) - Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation [64.64849950642619]
We develop an evaluation framework inspired by formal semantics for evaluating text-to-image models.
We show that Davidsonian Scene Graph (DSG) produces atomic and unique questions organized in dependency graphs.
We also present DSG-1k, an open-sourced evaluation benchmark that includes 1,060 prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T16:20:10Z) - Improving Question Generation with Multi-level Content Planning [70.37285816596527]
This paper addresses the problem of generating questions from a given context and an answer, specifically focusing on questions that require multi-hop reasoning across an extended context.
We propose MultiFactor, a novel QG framework based on multi-level content planning. Specifically, MultiFactor includes two components: FA-model, which simultaneously selects key phrases and generates full answers, and Q-model which takes the generated full answer as an additional input to generate questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T13:57:01Z) - Towards Enriched Controllability for Educational Question Generation [0.0]
Question Generation (QG) is a task within Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Recent work on QG aims to control the type of generated questions so that they meet educational needs.
This study aims to enrich controllability in QG by introducing a new guidance attribute: question explicitness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-21T11:21:08Z) - Improving Controllability of Educational Question Generation by Keyword
Provision [2.305378099875569]
We report a state-of-the-art exam-like QG model by advancing the current best model from 11.96 to 20.19.
We propose to investigate a variant of QG setting by allowing users to provide keywords for guiding QG direction.
Experiments are also performed and the results demonstrate the feasibility and potentials of improving QG diversity and controllability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-02T06:54:44Z) - Improving Unsupervised Question Answering via Summarization-Informed
Question Generation [47.96911338198302]
Question Generation (QG) is the task of generating a plausible question for a passage, answer> pair.
We make use of freely available news summary data, transforming declarative sentences into appropriate questions using dependency parsing, named entity recognition and semantic role labeling.
The resulting questions are then combined with the original news articles to train an end-to-end neural QG model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-16T13:08:43Z) - Guiding the Growth: Difficulty-Controllable Question Generation through
Step-by-Step Rewriting [30.722526598633912]
We argue that Question Generation (QG) systems should have stronger control over the logic of generated questions.
We propose a novel framework that progressively increases question difficulty through step-by-step rewriting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-25T06:43:13Z) - QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question
Answering [122.84513233992422]
We propose a new model, QA-GNN, which addresses the problem of answering questions using knowledge from pre-trained language models (LMs) and knowledge graphs (KGs)
We show its improvement over existing LM and LM+KG models, as well as its capability to perform interpretable and structured reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-13T17:32:51Z) - Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA [95.9105154311491]
We introduce two approaches to improve unsupervised Question Answering (QA)
First, we harvest lexically and syntactically divergent questions from Wikipedia to automatically construct a corpus of question-answer pairs (named as RefQA)
Second, we take advantage of the QA model to extract more appropriate answers, which iteratively refines data over RefQA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-06T15:56:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.